Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 493–516 | Cite as

Presentation as indirection, indirection as schooling: The two aspects of Benjamin’s scholastic method

Article
  • 374 Downloads

Abstract

Why does Walter Benjamin claim “indirection” (Umweg) to be the proper method for philosophical contemplation and writing? Why is this method—embodied, according to Benjamin, in the convoluted form of scholastic treatises and in their use of citations—fundamental for understanding his Origin of German Trauerspiel as suggesting an alternative to most strands of modern philosophy? The explicit and well-studied function of this method is for the presentation of what cannot be represented in language, of what cannot be intended or approached in thinking. Namely, of what Benjamin understands as “truth.” Indeed, as Adorno implied, providing a method for presenting an intentionless reality, rather than for re-presenting the world as corresponding to the mind, is revolutionary. However, I claim that beyond its presentational function, the method of indirection has a further, pedagogical function. Benjamin’s concept of truth requires thinking in a manner that does not impose any exterior form, any conceptual or intuitive intention on truth and the materials in which it might be exhibited. The methodological adoption of digressive and intermittent writing is supposed to transform the way we think, or more accurately, the position (Haltung) from which thinking occurs. By examining Benjamin’s use of pedagogical terms against the backdrop of scholastic history and the Urfigure of modern method, that of Descartes, I show that writing and reading in the form of the tractatus serves as exercise in receding from the subject-position—a position of a subject intending an object—and thus conditions the presentation of intentionless truth.

Keywords

Walter Benjamin Scholasticism Intentionality Method Truth Disposition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Naveh Frumer, Michael Jennings and the participants of the “Allegory as a Way of Life” workshop in the Minerva Center for the Humanities in Tel Aviv University for their insightful comments on former versions of this paper. I also thank the Minerva Stiftung Gesellschaft für die Forschung m.b.H. and the Minerva Humanities Center at Tel Aviv University for supporting the work on this article.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor. 1977. The actuality of philosophy. Telos 31: 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquinas, Thomas. 1952. Article 1: What is truth. In Opera Maiora, Vol. 1: The Disputed Questions on Truth. Trans. R.W. Mulligan. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, Andrew. 2013. Working with Walter Benjamin: Recovering a Political Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Walter. 1977. The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osborne. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, Walter. 1991. Zweideutigkeit des Begrieffs der ‘unendlichen Aufgabe’ in der Kantischen Schule. In Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VI, 53. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, Walter. 1996a. On the Program of the Coming Philosophy. In Selected Writings Vol. 1. Trans. Mark Ritter, ed. Mark Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, 100–110. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,).Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter. 1996b. One-way Street. In Selected Writings Vol. 1. Trans. Edmund Jephcott, ed. Mark Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, 444–488. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, Walter. 1999. Surrealism: The last snapshot of the European intelligentsia. In Selected Writings Vol. 2. Trans. Edmund Jephcott, ed: Marcus Bullock, and Michael W. Jennings, 207–221. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benjamin, Walter. 2003. What is Epic Theater? In Selected Writings Vol. 4. Trans: Edmund Jephcott, ed: Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings, 302–309. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Benjamin, Walter. 2017. Origin of German Trauerspiel. Trans. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings. Manuscript in preparation for Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cadava, Eduardo, Peter Connor, and Nancy Jean-Luc. 1991. Who Comes After the Subject?. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Caygill, Howard. 1998. Walter Benjamin: The Colour of Experience. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Descartes, René. 1985. Discourse on the Method. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, Jacques. 1983. La Langue et la Discours de la Méthode. In Recherches sur la Philosophie et le Langage, vol. 3. Grenoble: Institut de philosophie et sociologie.Google Scholar
  15. Duden Online. 2016. Haltung. Dudenverlag. Web http://www.duden.de/node/674735/revisions/1325225/view. 30 July 2016.
  16. Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm. 1998–2016. Haltung. Trier Center for Digital Humanities. Web http://woerterbuchnetz.de/cgi-bin/WBNetz/genFOplus.tcl?sigle=DWB&lemid=GH01626. 30 July 2016.
  17. Eiland, Howard, and Michael Jennings. 2014. Walter Benjamin: A Critical Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Endres, Josef. 1889. Über den Ursprung und die Entwicklung der scholastischen Lehrmethode. Philosophiches Jahrbuch 2: 52–59.Google Scholar
  19. Fenves, Peter. 2011. The Messianic Reduction: Walter Benjamin and the Shape of Time. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ferber, Ilit. 2013. Philosophy and Melancholy: Benjamin’s Early Reflections on Theater and Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ferris, David. 2006. Introduction: Reading Benjamin. In The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin, ed. David S. Ferris, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, Hans-Jost. 1996. On presentation in Benjamin. In Walter Benjamin: Theoretical Questions, ed. David S. Ferris, 139–164. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Friedlander, Eli. 2012. Walter Benjamin: A Philosophical Portrait. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grabmann, Martin. 1957. Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode. Freiburg in Brasgau: Herdersche.Google Scholar
  25. Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Spiritual exercises. In Philosophy as a Way of Life. Trans. Michael Chase, ed: Arnold Davidson, 81–125. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Jarosinski, Eric. 1999. One little rule: On Benjamin, autobiography, and never using the word ‘I’. In A Companion to the Works of Walter Benjamin, ed. Rolf J. Goebel, 130–151. Rochester NY: Camden House.Google Scholar
  27. Jennings, Michael. 2016. Introduction. In Walter Benjamin, One-Way Street, ed. Michael Jennings, 1–20. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kenny, Anthony, and J. Pinborg. 1982. Medieval philosophic literature. In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg, 11–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kleinwort, Malte. 2011. Zur Desorientierung im Manuskript der Vorrede zu Benjamins trauerspielbuch. Benjamin-Studien 2: 87–110.Google Scholar
  30. Leinsle, Ulrich. 2010. Introduction to Scholastic Theology. Trans. Michael J. Miller. The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  31. Makdisi, George. 1981. The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nägele, Rainer. 1991. Theater, Theory, Speculation: Walter Benjamin and the Scenes of Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nägele, Rainer. 2006. Body politics: Benjamin’s dialectical materialism between Brecht and the Frankfurt School. In The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin, ed. David Ferris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Oxford Dictionaries. 2016. Method. Oxford University Press, n.d. Web. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/e. 21 March 2016.
  35. Panofsky, Erwin. 1951. Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism: An Inquiry into Analogy, Arts, Philosophy and Religion in the Middle Ages. Latrobe, PA: The Archabbey Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, Yossef. 1999. From the Monastery to the University: Between Theology and Philosophy in the Middle Ages (in Hebrew). Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defense Publishing House.Google Scholar
  37. Steiner, George. 1977. Introduction. In The Origin of German Tragic Drama, ed. Walter Benjamin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2013. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, Samuel. 2008. Benjamin's-abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minerva Humanities CenterTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations