Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 1–3 | Cite as

Introduction: Merleau-Ponty’s Gordian knot

  • Andrew InkpinEmail author
  • Jack Reynolds
Article

A feature of Merleau-Ponty’s work that both distinguishes him from the other classical phenomenologists and makes him of particular contemporary interest is his intensive and explicit engagement with scientific research. However, as enticing as the prospect of a scientifically informed, but genuinely philosophical phenomenology might be, there is much uncertainty over how to understand Merleau-Ponty’s methodological and metaphilosophical commitments. Particularly vexing is his apparent commitment to transcendental phenomenology on the one hand, along with his extensive use of empirical science—which seems to imply at least concessions to naturalism—on the other. For this brings together two kinds of intellectual project that have commonly been thought of as distinct or even incommensurable by both traditional and contemporary authors. The image of the Gordian knot captures this enticing but apparently unfathomable constellation of ideas, while prompting the question of whether and how...

Keywords

Empirical Science Transcendental Phenomenology Transcendental Idealism German Idealism Transcendental Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations