Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 363–379 | Cite as

Right Outta’ Nowhere: Jean-Luc Nancy, phenomenon and event ex nihilo

Article

Abstract

This essay proposes to read Jean-Luc Nancy’s references to creation ex nihilo as both an intervention in the French debate concerning eventness, and as a transformative rethinking of the status of phenomenality. Nancy’s position is roughly triangulated relative to key remarks from other thinkers and, above all, its distinctive components (temporality, negativity, spatiality) are elucidated through historical glosses. Articulating the overall architecture of this theory serves to illustrate the Heideggerian access to the event debate. It also deepens aspects only elliptically alluded to in Nancy’s own writing.

Keywords

Nancy Phenomenality Event Heidegger 

References

  1. Blanchot, M. 1955. L’Espace littéraire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchot, M. 1980. L’écriture du désastre. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  3. Corrigan, K. 1996. Essence and existence in the Enneads. In Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. L.P.Gerson. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar
  4. Courtine, J.-F. 1990. Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. 1988. Le Pli: Leibniz et le baroque. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. 1967. L’Écriture et la différance. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. 1972. Marges – de la philosophie. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. 2000. Le Toucher – Jean-Luc Nancy. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  9. Düsing, K. 1976. Das Problem der Subjektivität in Hegels Logik. Hegel-Studien Bd. 15. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
  10. Hadot, P. 1963. La distinction de l’être et de l’étant dans le De Hebdomadibus de Boèce. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 2: 147–153.Google Scholar
  11. Hamacher, W. 1993. Ou, séance, touche de Nancy, ici. Paragraph 16(2): 216–231.Google Scholar
  12. Nancy, J.-L. 1996. Etre, singulier, pluriel. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  13. Nancy, J.-L. 2001a. Le Sens du monde. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  14. Nancy, J.-L. 2001b. Dies illa. D’une fin à l’infini, ou de la création. Jean-François Lyotard, L’exercice du différend. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  15. Nancy, J.-L. 2002. A L’écoute. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  16. Nancy, J.-L. 2003. Au fond des images. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  17. Romano, C. 1998. L’Evénement et le monde. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Romano, C. 2002. Entre le vide et l’événement pur. Études Phénoménologiques XVIII (36): 5–38.Google Scholar
  19. Schelling, F.W.J. 1995. Ausgewählte Schriften, vol. 6. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  20. Schnell, A. 2010. En deçà du sujet. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  21. Schönberg, A. 1922. Harmonielehre. Wien: Universal.Google Scholar
  22. Zangeneh, H. 2009. La structuration de la phénoménalité: temporalité, trace, événement, (Heidegger, Derrida, Nancy), Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris Est – Paris XII, Créteil.Google Scholar
  23. Zangeneh, H. 2010; Novelty, temporality, negativity: Event-metaphysics with Jean-Luc Nancy. Pli 21: 43–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State UniversityStanislausUSA

Personalised recommendations