Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy and second-person methodology

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How the phenomenology of empathy in Husserl and beyond and the second-person approach of cognition are able to mutually enrich and constrain each other? Whereas the intersubjective empathy is limited to face-to-face inter-individual relational experiences or, when socially embedded, results a non-individualized understanding of others in general, the second person approach of cognition opens the way for a plural relational yet individualized understanding of the other. I would like to show in this paper how the integration of both phenomenological and cognitive fields paves the way for the more encompassing description of intersubjective experience as a “relational multiplicity,” which I will ultimately describe through the empirical practice of an emergency psychiatric unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Depraz (1995); Kern (1962).

  2. Husserl (1973); Ricœur (1990); Depraz (1995).

  3. Depraz, Varela, Vermersch (2003, p. 85).

  4. Depraz, Varela, Vermersch (2003, p. 84).

  5. Depraz and Cosmelli (2003).

  6. Depraz (2001).

  7. Spiegelberg (1995).

  8. Depraz and Cosmelli (2003: p. 191).

  9. Goldstein (1995: pp. 37–40).

  10. Varela, Shear (1999); Petitmengin (2009).

  11. Varela (1996).

  12. Varela and Depraz (2000); Varela and Depraz (2003).

  13. Bitbol (2002).

  14. Depraz, Varela, Vermersch (2003/2011).

  15. Levine (1983); Chalmers (1995).

  16. Depraz and Cosmelli (2003).

  17. Wittezaele (2003, pp. 31–101).

  18. Elkaïm (1989).

  19. Robin (1998).

  20. Depraz (2005), Boszormenyi-Nagy (1987), Michard (1991).

  21. Kannas (2000).

  22. Depraz and Mauriac (2005).

  23. Larchet (1996: pp. 141–151), Yannaras (1983), Zizioulas (1981).

  24. Yannaras (1986).

References

  • Bitbol, M. 2002. Science as if situation mattered. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 181–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. 1987. Foundation of contextual therapy. Collected papers of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy. New-York: Brunner Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraz, N. 1995. Transcendance et incarnation. L’altérité à soi dans la philosophie de Edmund Husserl. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraz, N. 2001. The Husserlian theory of intersubjectivity as alterology. Emergent theories and wisdom traditions in the light of genetc phenomenology. Special issue ed. E. Thompson between ourselves. Second-person issues in the study of consciousness. Journal of Conciousness Studies 8(5–7): 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraz, N., F.J. Varela, and P. Vermersch. 2003. On becoming aware. A pragmatics of experiencing. Boston/Amsterdam: Benjamins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraz N., and Cosmelli D. 2003. Empathy and openness: Practices of intersubjectivity at the core of the science of consciousness. The problem of consciousness. New essays in phenomenological philosophy of mind (E. Thompson ed.), Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplementary volume 29: 163–205.

  • Depraz, N. 2005. L’éthique relationnelle: une pratique de la résonance inter-personnelle. Olivetti M. (ed). Le don et la dette. Milan: Cedam.

  • Depraz, N., and F. Mauriac 2005. La résonance comme épochè éthique. Alter 13.

  • Elkaïm, M. 1989. Si tu m’aimes, ne m’aime pas. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. 1995. The organism. New York: Zone books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1973. Zur Intersubjektivität. Husserliana XIII–XIV–XV.

  • Kannas, S. et al. 2000. L’expérience d’un service mobile d’urgence psychiatrique (E.R.I.C.) à propos du risque de passage à l’acte des patients et de la sécurité des professionnels. Réflexions concernant le contexte et les aspects relationnels. Cahiers critiques de thérapie familiale et de pratiques de réseaux 24.

  • Kern, I. 1962. Die drei Wege zur transzendentalphänomenologischen Reduktion in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 24.

  • Larchet, J.C. 1996. La divinisation de l’homme selon saint Maxime le Confesseur. Paris: Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. 1983. Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quaterly 64: 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michard, P. 1991. De l’éthique intime. Groupe familial 133: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. 2009. Ten years of viewing from within. The legacy of Francisco Varela. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(11–12): 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, M., et al. 1998. Ethique pratique et situation de crise en psychiatrie. L’évolution psychiatrique 63(1–2): 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg, H. 1995. Towards a phenomenology of imaginative understanding of others. Proceedings of the 11th international congress of philosophy. brussels VII: 232–239.

  • Varela, F.J. 1996. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4): 330–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F.J., and J. Shear 1999. The view from within. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(2–3): 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.J., and N. Depraz 2000. At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. In Ipseity and alterity: Interdisciplinary approaches to intersubjectivity, eds. Gallagher S., Watson S. Rouen: Presses Universitaires de Rouen.

  • Varela, F.J., and N. Depraz. 2003. Au cœur du temps: l’auto-antécédance II. Intellectica 36(37): 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittezaele, J–.J. 2003. L’homme relationnel. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannaras, Ch. 1983. La liberté de la morale. Genève: Labor et Fides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannaras, Ch. 1986. Philosophie sans rupture. Genève: Labor et Fides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizioulas, J. 1981. L’être ecclésial. Genève: Labor et Fides.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Applied Epistemology (Paris), University of Rouen (E.R.I.A.C.) Husserl-Archives (ENS, Paris), Rouen, France

    Natalie Depraz

Authors
  1. Natalie Depraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Depraz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Depraz, N. Empathy and second-person methodology. Cont Philos Rev 45, 447–459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-012-9223-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-012-9223-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation