Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 241–265 | Cite as

Heidegger and the narrativity debate

  • Tony FisherEmail author
Article

Abstract

One unresolved dispute within Heidegger scholarship concerns the question of whether Dasein should be conceived in terms of narrative self-constitution. A survey of the current literature suggests two standard responses. The first correlates Heidegger’s talk of authentic historicality with that of self-authorship. To the alternative perspective, however, Heidegger’s talk of Dasein’s existentiality, with its emphasis on nullity and unattainability, is taken as evidence that Dasein is structurally and ontologically incapable of being completed via any life-project. Narrativity imports into Being and Time commitments concerning temporality, selfhood, and ethics, which Heidegger rejects. Although both positions find good exegetic support for their conclusions, they can’t both be right. In this article, I navigate a path between these two irreconcilable positions by applying insights derived from recent debates within Anglo-American literature on personal identity. I develop an alternative thesis to Narrativism, without rejecting it outright, by arguing that Dasein can be analysed in terms of what I call “narratability conditions.” These allow us to make sense of the prima facie paradoxical notion of “historicality without narrativity.” Indeed, rather than reconciling the two standard positions, I hold that the tension between them says something important about Dasein’s kind of existence. Thus I conclude that while the narrativist question “Who ought I to be?” is perfectly legitimate within limits, what the existential analysis of the limits on narratability reveals is that no answer to this question can ever be definitive.

Keywords

Heidegger Narrative Personal identity Strawson Authenticity 

References

  1. Atkins, Kim. 2004. Narrative identity, practical identity and ethical subjectivity. Continental Philosophy Review 34: 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blattner, William. 1999. Heidegger’s temporal idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s analytic, interpretation, discourse, and authenticity in being and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr, David. 1991. Time, narrative, and history. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Christman, John. 2004. Narrative unity as a condition of personhood. Metaphilosophy 35(5): 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, Hubert.L. 2001. Being in the World, a commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division 1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Guignon, Charles. 1983. Heidegger and the problem of knowledge. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Guignon, Charles. 1993. Authenticity, moral values, and psychotherapy. In Cambridge companion to Heidegger, ed. Charles Guignon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guignon, Charles. 2000. Philosophy and authenticity: Heidegger’s search for a ground for philosophizing. In Heidegger, authenticity, and modernity, essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 1, ed. Mark Wrathall, and Jeff Malpas. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Guignon, Charles. 1992. History and commitment in early Heidegger. In: Heidegger, a critical reader, eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Harrison Hall. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J., and Robinson, E.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin. 1992 (1928). The metaphysical foundations of logic (trans: Heim, M.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1995 (1929/30). Fundamental concepts of metaphysics, world, finitude, solitude (trans: McNeill, W., and Walker, N.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hume, David. 1793. A treatise of human nature. In A treatise of human nature, eds. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. James, William. 1981. The principles of psychology, vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kierkegaard, Søren. 1990. Either/Or II (trans: Hong, H.V., and Hong, E.H.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kisiel, Theodore. 1995. The genesis of being and time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lippett, John. 2007. Getting the story straight: Kierkegaard, MacIntyre and some problems with narrative. Inquiry 50(1): 34–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2008. Existentialism & humanism (trans: Mairet, P.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  20. Schechtman, Marya. 1996. The constitution of selves. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schechtman, Marya. 2005. Empathic access: The missing ingredient in personal identity. In Personal identity, ed. Raymond Martin, and John Barresi. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Strawson, Galen. 1999. The self and SESMETS. In Models of the self, eds. Shaun Gallagher and Jonathan Shear. San Diego: Imprint Academic, University of California.Google Scholar
  23. Strawson, Galen. 2005a. Against narrative. The self?. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Strawson, Galen (2005b) The self. Personal identity. In eds. Raymond Martin and John Barresi. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Streeter, Ryan. 1997. Heidegger’s formal indication: A question of method in being and time. Man and World 30: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, Charles. 2002. The sources of the self, the making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, Charles. 1976. Responsibility for self. In The identities of persons, ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Velleman, J.D. 2006. The self as narrator. Self to self, selected essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central School of Speech and DramaUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations