Advertisement

Letters in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 108, Issue 4, pp 985–1006 | Cite as

Existence of Hartree–Fock excited states for atoms and molecules

  • Mathieu Lewin
Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

For neutral and positively charged atoms and molecules, we prove the existence of infinitely many Hartree–Fock critical points below the first energy threshold (that is, the lowest energy of the same system with one electron removed). This is the equivalent, in Hartree–Fock theory, of the famous Zhislin–Sigalov theorem which states the existence of infinitely many eigenvalues below the bottom of the essential spectrum of the N-particle linear Schrödinger operator. Our result improves a theorem of Lions in 1987 who already constructed infinitely many Hartree–Fock critical points, but with much higher energy. Our main contribution is the proof that the Hartree–Fock functional satisfies the Palais–Smale property below the first energy threshold. We then use minimax methods in the N-particle space, instead of working in the one-particle space.

Keywords

Hartree-Fock theory Excited states Palais-Smale property Min-max methods Atoms and molecules HVZ theorem 

Mathematics Subject Classification

81V55 35Q40 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Éric Séré for useful comments. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement MDFT No. 725528).

References

  1. 1.
    Ambrosetti, A., Rabinowitz, P.: Dual variation methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Funct. Anal. 14, 349–381 (1973)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anantharaman, A., Cancès, E.: Existence of minimizers for Kohn–Sham models in quantum chemistry. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26, 2425–2455 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bach, V.: Error bound for the Hartree–Fock energy of atoms and molecules. Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 527–548 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach, V.: Accuracy of mean field approximations for atoms and molecules. Commun. Math. Phys. 155, 295–310 (1993)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bach, V., Lieb, E.H., Loss, M., Solovej, J.P.: There are no unfilled shells in unrestricted Hartree–Fock theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2981–2983 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bach, V., Lieb, E.H., Solovej, J.P.: Generalized Hartree–Fock theory and the Hubbard model. J. Stat. Phys. 76, 3–89 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bahri, A.: Une méthode perturbative en théorie de Morse, Chap. V. Thèse de Doctorat d’État, Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bahri, A., Lions, P.-L.: Remarques sur la théorie variationnelle des points critiques et applications. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 301, 145–147 (1985)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bahri, A., Lions, P.-L.: Morse index of some min–max critical points. I. Application to multiplicity results. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 1027–1037 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barca, G.M.J., Gilbert, A.T.B., Gill, P.M.W.: Communication: Hartree–Fock description of excited states of H2. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 111104 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berestycki, H., Lions, P.-L.: Nonlinear scalar field equations. II. Existence of infinitely many solutions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 82, 347–375 (1983)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cancès, É., Galicher, H., Lewin, M.: Computing electronic structures: a new multiconfiguration approach for excited states. J. Comput. Phys. 212, 73–98 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coffman, C.V.: Lyusternik–Schnirelman theory: complementary principles and the Morse index. Nonlinear Anal. 12, 507–529 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Esteban, M.J., Lewin, M., Séré, É.: Variational methods in relativistic quantum mechanics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 45, 535–593 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esteban, M.J., Séré, É.: Stationary states of the nonlinear Dirac equation: a variational approach. Commun. Math. Phys. 171, 323–350 (1995)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esteban, M.J., Séré, É.: Solutions of the Dirac–Fock equations for atoms and molecules. Commun. Math. Phys. 203, 499–530 (1999)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fang, G.: Morse indices of critical manifolds generated by min–max methods with compact Lie group actions and applications. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 48, 1343–1368 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang, G., Ghoussoub, N.: Second-order information on Palais–Smale sequences in the mountain pass theorem. Manuscr. Math. 75, 81–95 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang, G., Ghoussoub, N.: Morse-type information on Palais–Smale sequences obtained by min–max principles. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 47, 1595–1653 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fefferman, C.L., Seco, L.A.: Asymptotic neutrality of large ions. Commun. Math. Phys. 128, 109–130 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friesecke, G.: The multiconfiguration equations for atoms and molecules: charge quantization and existence of solutions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 169, 35–71 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghoussoub, N.: Location, multiplicity and Morse indices of min–max critical points. J. Reine Angew. Math. 417, 27–76 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghoussoub, N.: Duality and Perturbation Methods in Critical Point Theory. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hofer, H.: A geometric description of the neighbourhood of a critical point given by the mountain-pass theorem. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 31, 566–570 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hunziker, W.: On the spectra of Schrödinger multiparticle Hamiltonians. Helv. Phys. Acta 39, 451–462 (1966)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lazer, A.C., Solimini, S.: Nontrivial solutions of operator equations and Morse indices of critical points of min–max type. Nonlinear Anal. 12, 761–775 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lenzmann, E., Lewin, M.: Dynamical ionization bounds for atoms. Anal. PDE 6, 1183–1211 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Léon, J.: Excited states for Coulomb systems in the Hartree–Fock approximation. Commun. Math. Phys. 120, 261–268 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewin, M.: The multiconfiguration methods in quantum chemistry: Palais–Smale condition and existence of minimizers. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 334, 299–304 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lewin, M.: Solutions of the multiconfiguration equations in quantum chemistry. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 171, 83–114 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lewin, M.: Geometric methods for nonlinear many-body quantum systems. J. Funct. Anal. 260, 3535–3595 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, C., Lu, J., Yang, W.: Gentlest ascent dynamics for calculating first excited state and exploring energy landscape of Kohn–Sham density functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 224110 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lieb, E.H.: Bound on the maximum negative ionization of atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. A 29, 3018–3028 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lieb, E.H., Sigal, I.M., Simon, B., Thirring, W.: Approximate neutrality of large-\(Z\) ions. Commun. Math. Phys. 116, 635–644 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lieb, E.H., Simon, B.: The Hartree–Fock theory for Coulomb systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 53, 185–194 (1977)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lions, P.-L.: Sur l’existence d’états excités dans la théorie de Hartree–Fock. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 294, 377–379 (1982)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lions, P.-L.: The concentration–compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part I. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 109–149 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lions, P.-L.: The concentration–compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part II. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 1, 223–283 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lions, P.-L.: Solutions of Hartree–Fock equations for Coulomb systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 109, 33–97 (1987)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lions, P.-L.: Hartree–Fock and related equations. In: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications. Collège de France Seminar, Vol. IX (Paris, 1985–1986), vol. 181 of Pitman Res. Notes in Mathematics Series, pp. 304–333. Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow (1988)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nam, P.T.: New bounds on the maximum ionization of atoms. Commun. Math. Phys. 312, 427–445 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paturel, E.: Solutions of the Dirac–Fock equations without projector. Ann. Henri Poincaré 1, 1123–1157 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rabinowitz, P. H.: Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations. In: CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 65. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC (1986)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. Academic Press, New York (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics IV. Analysis of Operators. Academic Press, New York (1978)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ruskai, M.B.: Absence of discrete spectrum in highly negative ions: II. Extension to fermions. Commun. Math. Phys. 85, 325–327 (1982)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Seco, L.A., Sigal, I.M., Solovej, J.P.: Bound on the ionization energy of large atoms. Commun. Math. Phys. 131, 307–315 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sigal, I.M.: Geometric methods in the quantum many-body problem. Non existence of very negative ions. Commun. Math. Phys. 85, 309–324 (1982)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sigal, I.M.: How many electrons can a nucleus bind? Ann. Phys. 157, 307–320 (1984)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Solimini, S.: Morse index estimates in min–max theorems. Manuscr. Math. 63, 421–453 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Solovej, J.P.: Proof of the ionization conjecture in a reduced Hartree–Fock model. Invent. Math. 104, 291–311 (1991)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Solovej, J.P.: The Size of Atoms in Hartree–Fock Theory, pp. 321–332. Birkhäuser, Boston (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Solovej, J.P.: The ionization conjecture in Hartree–Fock theory. Ann. Math. (2) 158, 509–576 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Struwe, M.: Variational Methods: Applications to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Hamiltonian Systems, 4th edn. Springer, New York (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tanaka, K.: Morse indices at critical points related to the symmetric mountain pass theorem and applications. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 14, 99–128 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tassi, M., Theophilou, I., Thanos, S.: Hartree–Fock calculation for excited states. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 113, 690–693 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Van Winter, C.: Theory of finite systems of particles. I. The green function. Mat.-Fys. Skr. Danske Vid. Selsk. 2(8), 60 (1964)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Viterbo, C.: Indice de Morse des points critiques obtenus par minimax. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 5, 221–225 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vugalter, S., Zhislin, G.M.: Finiteness of a discrete spectrum of many-particle Hamiltonians in symmetry spaces (coordinate and momentum representations). Teoret. Mat. Fiz. 32, 70–87 (1977)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yafaev, D.: On the point spectrum in the quantum-mechanical many-body problem. Math. USSR Izv. 40, 861–896 (1976). English translationzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhislin, G.M.: Discussion of the spectrum of Schrödinger operators for systems of many particles. Trudy Moskovskogo matematiceskogo obscestva 9, 81–120 (1960). (in Russian)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhislin, G.M., Sigalov, A.G.: The spectrum of the energy operator for atoms with fixed nuclei on subspaces corresponding to irreducible representations of the group of permutations. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 29, 835–860 (1965)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS and CEREMADE, Université Paris-DauphinePSL Research UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations