Skip to main content
Log in

A Machine Learning Approach for Material Type Logging and Chemical Assaying from Autonomous Measure-While-Drilling (MWD) Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the structure and mineralogical composition of a region is an essential step in mining, both during exploration (before mining) and in the mining process. During exploration, sparse but high-quality data are gathered to assess the overall orebody. During the mining process, boundary positions and material properties are refined as the mine progresses. This refinement is facilitated through drilling, material logging, and chemical assaying. Material type logging suffers from a high degree of variability due to factors such as the diversity in mineralization and geology, the subjective nature of human measurement even by experts, and human error in manually recording results. While laboratory-based chemical assaying is much more precise, it is time-consuming and costly and does not always capture or correlate boundary positions between all material types. This leads to significant challenges and financial implications for the industry, as the accuracy of production blasthole logging and assaying processes is essential for resource evaluation, planning, and execution of mine plans. To overcome these challenges, this work reports on a pilot study to automate the process of material logging and chemical assaying. A machine learning approach has been trained on features extracted from measurement-while-drilling (MWD) data, logged from autonomous drilling systems (ADS). MWD data facilitate the construction of profiles of physical drilling parameters as a function of hole depth. A hypothesis is formed to link these drilling parameters to the underlying mineral composition. The results of the pilot study discussed in this paper demonstrate the feasibility of this process, with correlation coefficients of up to 0.92 for chemical assays and 93% accuracy for material detection, depending on the material or assay type and their generalization across the different spatial regions. The results achieved are significant, showing opportunities to guide further drilling processes, provide chemistry data with downhole resolution, and continuously update mine plans as the mine progresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilbara.

References

  • Box J, Phillips J, Clout J (2002) Use of geological material types for predicting iron ore product characteristics. FUWA—Ward iron and steel making workshop

  • Cawley G, Talbot N (2010) On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res 11:2079–2107

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark I, Dominy S (2017) Underground bulk sampling, uniform conditioning and conditional simulation—unrealistic expectations? Eighth world conference on sampling and blending 61

  • de Silva CW (ed) (2005) Vibration and shock handbook, 1st edn. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039894

  • Dubnov S (2004) Generalization of spectral flatness measure for non-gaussian linear processes. Signal Process Lett IEEE 11:698–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galende M, Menéndez M, Fuente M, Sainz-Palmero G (2018) Monitor-while-drilling-based estimation of rock mass rating with computational intelligence: the case of tunnel excavation front. Autom Constr 93:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly P, Leung R, Scheding S, Robinson D (2015) Drill monitoring results reveal geological conditions in blasthole drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 78:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth B (1970) EEG analysis based on time domain properties. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 29(3):306–310 ISSN 0013-4694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott R (1993) A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 40:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneau P, Flahaut V, Maddever R (2017) Iron ore benefits from neutron pulsed geochemical tools. Conference proceedings: IRON ORE 2017, Perth, Australia) 2017:387–396

  • Johnston JD (1988) Transform coding of audio signals using perceptual noise criteria. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 6(2):314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanal M, Qin J, Shen B, Dlamini B (2020) Preliminary investigation into measurement while drilling as a means to characterize the coalmine roof. Resources 9:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorzoughi M, Hall R, Apel D (2018) Rock fracture density characterization using measurement while drilling (MWD) techniques. Int J Min Sci Technol 28:504–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Khushaba RN, Takruri M, Miro JV, Kodagoda S (2014) Towards limb position invariant myoelectric pattern recognition using time-dependent spectral features. Neural Netw 55:42–58 ISSN 0893-6080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung R, Scheding S (2015) Automated coal seam detection using a modulated specific energy measure in a monitor-while-drilling context. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:196–209 ISSN 1365-1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LHeureux A, Grolinger K, Elyamany HF, Capretz MAM (2017) Machine learning with big data: challenges and approaches. IEEE Access 5:7776–7797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Yang M, Li C, Cai P (2008) Analysis of heart rate variability based on singular value decomposition entropy. J Shanghai Univ (English Edition) 12:433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Market J, Byrne C, Robinson D, Jeanneau P, Rossiter H (2019) Downhole assays in the pilbara. Conference proceedings: IRON ORE 2019, Perth, Australia) 2019:366–386

  • McHugh C, Stokes A, Oppolzer F, Rogers B (2012) Automated multi-drills in Rio tinto. In: Conference proceedings: proceedings eighth open pit operators conference (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne) 2012:83–88

  • Meyer H, Reudenbach C, Hengl T, Katurji M, Nauss T (2018) Improving performance of spatio-temporal machine learning models using forward feature selection and target-oriented validation. Environ Modell Softw 101:1–9 ISSN 1364-8152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer H, Reudenbach C, Wöllauer S, Nauss T (2019) Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications—moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction. Ecol Modell 411:108815 ISSN 0304-3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J, Sanchidrián J, Segarra P, Castedo R, Costamagna E, López L (2018) Detection of potential overbreak zones in tunnel blasting from MWD data. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 82:504–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine M, Boyle C, Lewan A, Phuak E, Mackenzie P, Ryan E (2016) Geometallurgy at rtio—a new angle on an old concept. In: Third AusIMM international geometallurgy conference pp. 55–61

  • Park J, Kim K (2020) Use of drilling performance to improve rock-breakage efficiencies: a part of mine-to-mill optimization studies in a hard-rock mine. Int J Min Sci Technol 30(2):179–188 ISSN 2095-2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phinyomark A, Hirunviriya S, Limsakul C, Phukpattaranont P (2010) Evaluation of EMG feature extraction for hand movement recognition based on euclidean distance and standard deviation. In: International conference on electrical engineering/electronics computer telecommunications and information technology (ECTI-CON), Chiang Mai 2010:856–860

  • Rai P, Schunesson H, Lindqvist PA, Kumar U (2015) An overview on measurement-while-drilling technique and its scope in excavation industry. J Inst Eng (India): Ser D 96:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2005) Gaussian processes for machine learning (adaptive computation and machine learning). The MIT Press, ISBN, p 026218253X

  • Roberts DR, Bahn V, Ciuti S, Boyce MS, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Hauenstein S, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Schröder B, Thuiller W, Warton DI, Wintle BA, Hartig F, Dormann CF (2017) Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40(8):913–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal M, Xiao Y (2011) Multivariate random forests. WIREs Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silversides KL, Melkumyan A (2020) Boundary identification and surface updates using MWD. Math Geosci 53:1047–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09891-0

  • Smith C, Jeanneau P, Maddever R, Fraser S, Rojc A, Lofgren M, Flahau V (2015) PFTNA logging tools and their contributions to in-situ elemental analysis of mineral boreholes. TOS Forum 5:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville B, Boyle C, Brajkovich N, Savory P, Latscha AA (2014) Mineral resource estimation of the brockman 4 iron ore deposit in the pilbara region. Appl Earth Sci 123(2):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 36(2):111–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1977) An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaikes criterion. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 39(1):44–47 ISSN 00359246

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi H, Peeters L.J.M., Mueller U, Tolosana-Delgado R, van den Boogaart KG (2020) Towards geostatistical learning for the geosciences: a case study in improving the spatial awareness of spectral clustering. Math Geosci 52:1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09867-0

  • Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K (2009) Pattern recognition, 4th edn. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-59749-272-0.X0001-2

  • Wedge D, Hartley O, McMickan A, Green T, Holden EJ (2019) Machine learning assisted geological interpretation of drillhole data: examples from the pilbara region, western Australia. Ore Geol Rev 114:103118 ISSN 0169-1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedge D, Lewan A, Paine M, Holden EJ, Green T (2018) A data mining approach to validating drill hole logging data in pilbara iron ore exploration. Econ Geol 113:961–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Monteiro S, Hatherly P, Ramos F, Nettleton E, Oppolzer F (2010) Automated rock recognition with wavelet feature space projection and gaussian process classification. In: Proceedings–IEEE international conference on robotics and automation pp. 4444–4450

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Australian Centre for Field Robotics and the Rio Tinto Centre for Mine Automation. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of Anna Chlingaryan and Katherine Silversides in the manuscript review and editing process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rami N. Khushaba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khushaba, R.N., Melkumyan, A. & Hill, A.J. A Machine Learning Approach for Material Type Logging and Chemical Assaying from Autonomous Measure-While-Drilling (MWD) Data. Math Geosci 54, 285–315 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09970-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09970-w

Keywords

Navigation