Abstract
Three-dimensional subsurface elastic models inverted from seismic reflection data are the basis of the geo-modeling workflow. These models are often used to predict the spatial distribution of reservoir rock properties such as porosity, volume of minerals and fluid saturations. Stochastic seismic inversion methods are important modeling tools, as they allow one to infer high-resolution subsurface models and assess uncertainties related to the spatial distribution of the inverted petro-elastic properties. Within this framework, iterative geostatistical seismic inversion methods use stochastic sequential simulation and co-simulation as a model generation and perturbation technique based on the mismatch between synthetic and real seismic data. This work proposes an alternative approach of iterative geostatistical seismic inversion based on the concept of self-updating of local probability distributions of the elastic property of interest to be inverted. The model perturbation is conditioned by local probability distribution functions, which are iteratively updated based on the data misfit at previous iterations. This approach allows for better exploration of the model parameter space, avoiding local fast convergence at early steps of the inversion, and wider exploration of the model parameter space. The method is applied to a two-dimensional nonstationary synthetic dataset and to a three-dimensional real case example with a blind well test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo L, Soares A (2017) Geostatistical methods for reservoir Geophysics. Springer, Berlin
Azevedo L, Nunes R, Correia P, Soares A, Guerreiro L, Neto GS (2014) Multidimensional scaling for the evaluation of a geostatistical seismic elastic inversion methodology. Geophysics 79(1):M1–M10
Azevedo L, Nunes R, Correia P, Soares A, Guerreiro L, Neto GS (2015) Integration of well data into geostatistical seismic amplitude variation with angle inversion for facies estimation. Geophysics 80(6):M113–M128
Azevedo L, Nunes R, Soares A, Neto GS, Martins TS (2018) Geostatistical seismic Amplitude-versus-angle inversion. Geophys Prospect 66(S1):116–131
Bortoli LJ, Alabert F, Haas A, Journel AG (1993) Constraining stochastic images to seismic data. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia’92. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 325–337
Bosch M (1999) Lithologic tomography: from plural geophysical data to lithology estimation. J Geophys Res 104:749–766
Bosch M, Mukerji T, Gonzalez EF (2010) Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: a review. Geophysics 75(5):75A165–75A176
Buland A, Omre H (2003) Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics 68(1):185–198
Cox TF, Cox MAA (1994) Multidimensional scaling. Chapman & Hall, London
Doyen P (2007) Seismic reservoir characterization: an Earth modeling perspective. EAGE
González EF, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2008) Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple-point geostatistics. Geophysics 73(1):R11–R21
Grana D, Della Rossa E (2010) Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics 75(3):O21–O37
Grana D, Mukerji T, Dvokin J, Mavko G (2012) Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method. Geophysics 77(4):M53–M72
Grana D, Fjeldstad T, Omre H (2017) Bayesian Gaussian mixture linear inversion for geophysical inverse problems. Math Geosci 49:1–37
Haas A, Dubrule O (1994) Geostatistical inversion—a sequential method of stochastic reservoir modeling constrained by seismic data. First Break 12:561–569
Le Ravalec-Dupin M, Noetinger B (2002) Optimization with the gradual deformation method. Math Geol 34(2):125–142
Lindsay R, Koughnet RV (2001) Sequential Backus averaging: upscaling well logs to seismic wavelengths. Lead Edge 20:188–191
Nunes R, Soares A, Azevedo L, Pereira P (2017) Geostatistical seismic inversion with direct sequential simulation and co-simulation with multi-local distribution functions. Math Geosci 49(5):583–601
Pereira P, Bordignon F, Azevedo L, Soares A (2019) Strategies for integrating uncertainty in iterative geostatistical seismic inversion. Geophysics 84(2):1–49
Sambridge M (1999) Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm-I Searching a parameter space. Geophys J Inte 138(2):479–494
Sen MK, Stoffa PL (1991) Nonlinear one dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing. Geophysics 56(10):1624–1638
Soares A (2001) Direct sequential simulation and cosimulation. Math Geol 33(8):911–926
Soares A, Diet JD, Guerreiro L (2007) Stochastic inversion with a global perturbation method. Petroleum Geostatistics. EAGE, Amsterdam, pp 10–14
Soares A, Nunes R, Azevedo L (2017) Integration of uncertain data in geostatistical modelling. Math Geosci 49:253–273
Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009426274
Tarantola A (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the CERENA (strategic project FCT-UID/ECI/04028/2019), Partex Oil and Gas for making the dataset of the real case application available and permission to publish it, and Schlumberger for the donation of the academic licenses of Petrel®. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve the final version of the document.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azevedo, L., Narciso, J., Nunes, R. et al. Geostatistical Seismic Inversion with Self-Updating of Local Probability Distributions. Math Geosci 53, 1073–1093 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09896-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09896-9