Discrimination and Variance Structure of Trace Element Signatures in Fe-Oxides: A Case Study of BIF-Mineralisation from the Middleback Ranges, South Australia

  • Marija Dmitrijeva
  • Andrew V. Metcalfe
  • Cristiana L. Ciobanu
  • Nigel J. Cook
  • Max Frenzel
  • William M. Keyser
  • Geoff Johnson
  • Kathy Ehrig
Article

Abstract

Uni- and multivariate statistical analyses of trace element laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry data for Fe-oxides from banded iron formation (BIF) and BIF-hosted ores in 13 deposits/prospects of the Middleback Ranges, South Australia are presented. The obtained trace element signatures were considered within a petrographic-textural framework of iron-oxide evolution from magnetite through clean martite and porous martite to platy hematite, to evaluate changes in trace element concentrations with respect to the ore enrichment processes. Statistically valid distinctions among different hematite textures were indicated for most trace elements by linear mixed-effects models. Furthermore, the hematite data showed significant intra-class correlations between spot-analyses within individual polished blocks and correlations between polished blocks within individual deposits. The data are thus aggregated within their hierarchical levels. Two linear discriminant function analyses were performed to determine the combinations of trace elements that can distinguish hematite by textures and by location within the Middleback Ranges. Tin, a significant discriminator element in both models, reflects the regional influence of granite-affiliated hydrothermal fluids on the clean martite. This granitic signature, therefore, postdates formation of magnetite BIFs and potentially represents a supergene ore enrichment stage. The combination of Ni, Co, Ti and Nb was discovered to be uniquely attributed to discrimination of the Northern and Southern Middleback Ranges, indicating very specific local settings unrelated to hematite textures. Both local and regional settings impacting on the trace element signatures of Fe-oxides throughout iron ore formation are recognised, suggesting distinct ore enrichment conditions within various segments of the belt.

Keywords

Multivariate statistics Laser-ablation inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry Principal component analysis Linear mixed-effects models Discriminant function analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is a contribution to the project “Trace elements in Fe-oxides: deportment, distribution and application in ore genesis, geochronology, exploration and mineral processing”, supported by BHP Olympic Dam and the South Australian Government Mining and Petroleum Services Centre of Excellence. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Phung Thi Nguyen, Holly Feltus, Steve Johnson, Benjamin Tinney and Thomas Line (Arrium Mining Ltd) during fieldwork.

Supplementary material

11004_2018_9734_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (626 kb)
Electronic Appendix B: Trace Element Concentrations (In Ppm) In Iron-Oxides from Samples from The Middleback Ranges (LA-ICP-MS Data) (XLSX 625 kb)
11004_2018_9734_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (29 kb)
Electronic Appendix C: Pearson Correlation Coefficients of Trace Elements in Clean Martite, Porous Martite And Platy Hematite (XLSX 28 kb)

References

  1. Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall Ltd. (Reprinted 2003 with additional material by The Blackburn Press), London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0
  2. Aitchison J, Barceló-Vidal C, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2002) Some comments on compositional data analysis in archaeometry, in particular the fallacies in Tangri and Wright’s dismissal of logratio analysis. Archaeom 44:295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angerer T, Hagemann SG, Danyushevsky LV (2013) High-grade iron ore at Windarling, Yilgarn Craton: a product of syn-orogenic deformation, hypogene hydrothermal alteration and supergene modification in an Archean BIF-basalt lithostratigraphy. Miner Depos 48:697–728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-012-0450-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belissont R, Boiron MC, Luais B, Cathelinea M (2014) LA-ICP-MS analyses of minor and trace elements and bulk Ge isotopes in zoned Ge-rich sphalerites from the Noailhac-Saint-Salvy deposit (France): insights into incorporation mechanisms and ore deposition processes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 126:518–540.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya HN, Chakraborty I, Ghosh K (2007) Geochemistry of some banded iron formations of the Archean supracrustals, Jharkhand-Orissa region, India. J Earth Syst Sci 116:245–259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-007-0024-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbeil RR, Searle SR (1976) Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of variance components in the mixed model. Technometrics 18:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1267913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creaser RA, Fanning CM (1993) A U-Pb zircon study of the Mesoproterozoic Charleston Granite, Gawler Craton, South Australia. Aust J Earth Sci 40:519–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099308728101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalstra HJ, Rosière CA (2008) Structural controls on high-grade iron ores hosted by banded iron formation: a global perspective. Rev Econ Geol 15:73–106.  https://doi.org/10.5382/Rev.15.03 Google Scholar
  10. Davies MB (2000) Iron ore in South Australia. Primary industries and resources SA. Commod Rev 8:35Google Scholar
  11. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc 39:1–38.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2984875 Google Scholar
  12. Dupuis C, Beaudoin G (2011) Discriminant diagrams for iron oxide trace element fingerprinting of mineral deposit types. Miner Depos 46:319–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-011-0334-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frenzel M, Hirsch T, Gutzmer J (2016) Gallium, germanium, indium, and other trace and minor elements in sphalerite as a function of deposit type—A meta-analysis. Ore Geol Rev 76:52–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabriel KR (1971) The biplot graphical display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453–467.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Günther T, Klemd R, Zhang X, Horn I, Weyer S (2017) In-situ trace element and Fe-isotope studies on magnetite of the volcanic-hosted Zhibo and Chagangnuoer iron ore deposits in the Western Tianshan, NW China. Chem Geol 453:111–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagemann SG, Angerer T, Duuring P, Rosière CA, Figueiredo e Silva RC, Lobato LM, Hensler A-S, Walde DHG (2016) BIF-hosted iron mineral system: a review. Ore Geol Rev 76:317–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hensler A, Hagemann SG, Rosière CA, Angerer T, Gilbert S (2015) Hydrothermal and metamorphic fluid-rock interaction associated with hypogene “hard” iron ore mineralisation in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Brazil: implications from in-situ laser ablation ICP-MS iron oxide chemistry. Ore Geol Rev 69:325–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M (2011) Amelia II: a program for missing data. J Stat Softw 45:1–47.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson R, Wichern D (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Keyser K, Ciobanu CL, Cook NJ, Johnson G, Feltus H, Johnson S, Dmitrijeva M, Ehrig K, Nguyen PT (2018) Petrography and trace element signatures of iron-oxides in deposits from the Middleback Ranges, South Australia: from banded iron formation to ore. Ore Geol Rev 93:337–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Makvandi S, Ghasemzadeh-Barvarz M, Beaudoin G, Grunsky EC, McClenaghan MB, Duchesne C, McClenaghan MB, Duchesne C (2016a) Principal component analysis of magnetite composition from volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits: case studies from the Izok Lake (Nunavut, Canada) and Halfmile Lake (New Brunswick, Canada) deposits. Ore Geol Rev 72:60–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Makvandi S, Ghasemzadeh-Barvarz M, Beaudoin G, Grunsky EC, McClenaghan MB, Duchesne C, Boutroy E (2016b) Partial least squares-discriminant analysis of trace element compositions of magnetite from various VMS deposit subtypes: application to mineral exploration. Ore Geol Rev 78:388–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McAvaney S (2012) The Cooyerdoo Granite: Paleo- and Mesoarchean basement of the Gawler Craton. MESA J 65:31–40Google Scholar
  24. McIntyre JI (2001) Middleback Ranges Project—South Australia. EL 2763 Annual Report. Helix Resources N.LGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris RC (2012) Microplaty hematite—Its varied nature and genesis. Aust J Earth Sci 59:411–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker AJ (1993) The geology of South Australia, volume 1—The Precambrian. Geological Survey of South Australia, Bulletin, p 54Google Scholar
  27. Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2006) Compositional data and their analysis: an introduction. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 264:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.264.01.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peacock M (2016) Structural geology & high-grade iron ore mineralisation, Middleback Ranges, South Australia, Honours Thesis, The Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Pirajno F, Hoatson DM (2012) A review of Australia’s Large Igneous Provinces and associated mineral systems: implications for mantle dynamics through geological time. Ore Geol Rev 48:2–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 20 July 2017
  31. Reid A, Hand M (2012) Mesoarchean to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the southern Gawler Craton, South Australia. Episodes 35:216–225Google Scholar
  32. Szpunar M, Hand M, Barovich K, Jagodzinski E, Belousova E (2011) Isotopic and geochemical constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Hutchison Group, southern Australia: implications for Paleoproterozoic continental reconstructions. Precambrian Res 187:99–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor D, Dalstra HJ, Harding AE, Broadbent GC, Barley ME (2001) Genesis of high-grade hematite orebodies of the Hamersley Province, Western Australia. Econ Geol 96:837–873.  https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.96.4.837 Google Scholar
  34. Van Achterbergh E, Ryan CG, Jackson SE, Griffin WL (2001) Data reduction software for LAICP-MS. In: Sylvester JP (ed) Laser-ablation-ICPMS in the earth sciences; principles and applications. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Short Course Series, vol 29, pp 239–243Google Scholar
  35. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2003) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  36. Wang M, Wang W, Liu K, Michalak PP, Wei K, Hu M (2017) In-situ LA-ICP-MS trace elemental analyzes of magnetite: the Tieshan skarn Fe–Cu deposit, Eastern China. Chem Erde 77:169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2016.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winderbaum L, Ciobanu CL, Cook NJ, Paul M, Metcalfe AV, Gilbert S (2012) Multivariate analysis of an LA-ICP-MS trace element dataset for pyrite. Math Geosci 44:823–842.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9418-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou Z-J, Tang H-S, Chen Y-J, Chen Z-L (2017) Trace elements of magnetite and iron isotopes of the Zankan iron deposit, westernmost Kunlun, China: a case study of seafloor hydrothermal iron deposits. Ore Geol Rev 80:1191–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for MineralogyFreiberg University of Mining and TechnologyFreibergGermany
  4. 4.SIMEC MiningDulwichAustralia
  5. 5.BHP Olympic DamAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations