Abstract
The feasibility of geological carbon storage (GCS) sites depends on their capacity to retain safely \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\). While deep saline formations and depleted gas/oil reservoirs are good candidates to sequester \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\), gas/oil reservoirs typically have a limited storage capacity compared to ideal targets (\(\sim \) 1 Mt/year) considered for \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) disposal (Celia et al. in Water Resour Res 51(9):6846–6892, 2015. doi:10.1002/2015WR017609). In this respect, deep saline aquifers are considered more appropriate formations for GCS, but present the disadvantage of having limited characterization data. In particular, information about the continuity of the overlying sealing formations (caprock) is often sparse if it exists at all. In this work, a study of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage is conducted for a candidate GCS site located in the Michigan Basin, whose sealing properties of the caprock are practically unknown. Quantification of uncertainty on \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage from the storage formation is achieved through a Monte Carlo simulation approach, relying on the use of a computationally efficient semi-analytical leakage model based upon the solution derived by Nordbotten et al. (Environ Sci Technol 43(3):743–749, 2009), which assumes leakage occurs across “passive” wells intersecting caprock layers. A categorical indicator Kriging simulator is developed and implemented to represent the caprock sealing properties and model the permeability uncertainty. Binary fields of caprock permeability are generated and exhibit mostly low permeability, with sparsely-occurring local high permeability areas where brine and \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) may leak out of the storage formation. In addition, the feasibility of extending the use of the semi-analytical model to large-area leakage pathways is studied. This work advances a methodology for preliminary uncertainty quantification of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage at sites of GCS with little or no information on the sealing properties of the caprock. The implemented analysis shows that, for the considered site, \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage may not be negligible even for relatively low (\(\sim \) 1%) probabilities of finding permeable inclusions in the caprock and highlights the importance of being able to characterize caprock sealing properties over large areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachu S (2003) Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) in geological media in response to climate change. Environ Geol 44(3):277–289. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0762-9
Baù D, Cody B, González-Nicolás A (2015) An iterative global pressure solution for the semi-analytical simulation of geological carbon sequestration. Comput Geosci 19(4):781–789. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9489-4
Bergman PD, Winter EM (1995) Disposal of carbon-dioxide in aquifers in the US. Energy Convers Manag 36(6–9):523–526. doi:10.1016/0196-8904(95)00058-l
Celia MA, Nordbotten JM (2009) Practical modeling approaches for geological storage of carbon dioxide. Ground Water 47(5):627–638. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00590.x
Celia MA, Nordbotten JM, Court B, Dobossy M, Bachu S (2011) Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) and brine leakage along old wells. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5(2):257–269. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.10.005
Celia MA, Bachu S, Nordbotten JM, Bandilla K (2015) Status of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resour Res 51(9):6846–6892. doi:10.1002/2015WR017609
Chang KW, Minkoff S, Bryant S (2008) Modeling leakage through faults of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) stored in an aquifer. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/115929-ms
Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide, version 2.0, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Gasda SE, Bachu S, Celia MA (2004) Spatial characterization of the location of potentially leaky wells penetrating a deep saline aquifer in a mature sedimentary basin. Environ Geol 46(6–7):707–720. doi:10.1007/s00254-004-1073-5
González-Nicolás A, Baù D, Cody BM, Alzraiee A (2015a) Stochastic and global sensitivity analyses of uncertain parameters affecting the safety of geological carbon storage in saline aquifers of the Michigan Basin. Int J Greenh Gas Control 37:99–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.008
González-Nicolás A, Baù D, Alzraiee A (2015b) Detection of potential leakage pathways from geological carbon storage by fluid pressure data assimilation. Adv Water Resour 86:366–384. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.10.006
Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Applied geostatistics series. Oxford University Press on Demand, New York
Grana D, Mukerji T, Dovera L, Della Rossa E (2012) Sequential simulations of mixed discrete-continuous properties: sequential Gaussian mixture simulation. In: Abrahamsen P, Hauge R, Kolbjornsen O (eds) Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative geology and geostatistics, vol 17. Springer, Netherlands, pp 239–250
Hahn GJ (1967) Statistical models in engineering. Wiley series on systems engineering and analysis. Wiley, New York
Halliburton (1990) Log 21101375660000 Stech Upper Half (Date: 09/04/1990)
International Energy Agency (2008) Carbon capture and storage: meeting the challenge of climate change. IEA/OECD, Paris
Kopp A, Binning PJ, Johannsen K, Helmig R, Class H (2010) A contribution to risk analysis for leakage through abandoned wells in geological \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage. Adv Water Resour 33(8):867–879. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.05.001
MDEQOGD (2014) Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Oil and Gas Database. http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-6132_6828-98518--,00.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2014
Metz B, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III (2005) IPCC Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
Nicholls N, Gruza G, Jouzel J, Karl T, Ogallo L, Parker D (1996) Observed climate variability and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nogues JP, Court B, Dobossy M, Nordbotten JM, Celia MA (2012) A methodology to estimate maximum probable leakage along old wells in a geological sequestration operation. Int J Greenh Gas Control 7:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.003
Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, Bachu S, Dahle HK (2005) Semianalytical solution for \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) leakage through an abandoned well. Environ Sci Technol 39(2):602–611. doi:10.1021/es035338i
Nordbotten JM, Kavetski D, Celia MA, Bachu S (2009) Model for \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):743–749. doi:10.1021/Es801135v
Pacala SW (2003) Global constraints on reservoir leakage. In: Gale J, Kaya Y (eds) Greenhouse gas control technologies—6th international conference. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 267–272. doi:10.1016/B978-008044276-1/50043-X
Ruether JA (1998) FETC programs for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (No. DOE/FETC-98/1058). USDOE Federal Energy Technology Center, Pittsburgh
Sakamoto Y, Tanaka A, Tenma N, Komai T (2011) Numerical study on flow behavior of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) in an aquifer for risk assessment of carbon capture and storage. Energy Procedia 4:4170–4177. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.363
SCH (1983) Log 21101365880000 Burch Main Suite (Date 06/19/1983)
SCH (1991) Log 21101375660000 Stech Lower Half (Date: 06/29/1991)
Schlumberger (2010) Eclipse technical description, v. 2010.1, Report, Abingdon, UK
Solomon S, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group I (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Trebin FA (1945) Permeability to oil of sandstone reservoir. Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow
Turpening R, Toksöz M, Born AE (1992) Reservoir delineation consortium annual report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Zhang Y, Oldenburg CM, Finsterle S (2010) Percolation-theory and fuzzy rule-based probability estimation of fault leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites. Environ Earth Sci 59(7):1447–1459. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0131-4
Zhou Q, Birkholzer JT, Mehnert E, Lin Y-F, Zhang K (2009) Modeling basin- and plume-scale processes of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage for full-scale deployment. Ground Water 48(4):494–514. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00657.x
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE Project: DE-FE0001830). The research conducted was also made possible with the support of Schlumberger Ltd., who kindly donated the reservoir simulation software suites PETREL and ECLIPSE. The research team is also grateful to Michigan Technological University’s Professor Roger Turpening for providing access to the data library regarding the Niagara formations to which this research has been applied, as well as continued support to the use of this library.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Nicolás, A., Baù, D. & Cody, B.M. Application of Binary Permeability Fields for the Study of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) Leakage from Geological Carbon Storage in Saline Aquifers of the Michigan Basin. Math Geosci 50, 525–547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9706-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9706-x