Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of Binary Permeability Fields for the Study of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) Leakage from Geological Carbon Storage in Saline Aquifers of the Michigan Basin

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The feasibility of geological carbon storage (GCS) sites depends on their capacity to retain safely \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\). While deep saline formations and depleted gas/oil reservoirs are good candidates to sequester \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\), gas/oil reservoirs typically have a limited storage capacity compared to ideal targets (\(\sim \) 1 Mt/year) considered for \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) disposal (Celia et al. in Water Resour Res 51(9):6846–6892, 2015. doi:10.1002/2015WR017609). In this respect, deep saline aquifers are considered more appropriate formations for GCS, but present the disadvantage of having limited characterization data. In particular, information about the continuity of the overlying sealing formations (caprock) is often sparse if it exists at all. In this work, a study of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage is conducted for a candidate GCS site located in the Michigan Basin, whose sealing properties of the caprock are practically unknown. Quantification of uncertainty on \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage from the storage formation is achieved through a Monte Carlo simulation approach, relying on the use of a computationally efficient semi-analytical leakage model based upon the solution derived by Nordbotten et al. (Environ Sci Technol 43(3):743–749, 2009), which assumes leakage occurs across “passive” wells intersecting caprock layers. A categorical indicator Kriging simulator is developed and implemented to represent the caprock sealing properties and model the permeability uncertainty. Binary fields of caprock permeability are generated and exhibit mostly low permeability, with sparsely-occurring local high permeability areas where brine and \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) may leak out of the storage formation. In addition, the feasibility of extending the use of the semi-analytical model to large-area leakage pathways is studied. This work advances a methodology for preliminary uncertainty quantification of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage at sites of GCS with little or no information on the sealing properties of the caprock. The implemented analysis shows that, for the considered site, \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) leakage may not be negligible even for relatively low (\(\sim \) 1%) probabilities of finding permeable inclusions in the caprock and highlights the importance of being able to characterize caprock sealing properties over large areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachu S (2003) Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) in geological media in response to climate change. Environ Geol 44(3):277–289. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0762-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baù D, Cody B, González-Nicolás A (2015) An iterative global pressure solution for the semi-analytical simulation of geological carbon sequestration. Comput Geosci 19(4):781–789. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9489-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman PD, Winter EM (1995) Disposal of carbon-dioxide in aquifers in the US. Energy Convers Manag 36(6–9):523–526. doi:10.1016/0196-8904(95)00058-l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celia MA, Nordbotten JM (2009) Practical modeling approaches for geological storage of carbon dioxide. Ground Water 47(5):627–638. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00590.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celia MA, Nordbotten JM, Court B, Dobossy M, Bachu S (2011) Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) and brine leakage along old wells. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5(2):257–269. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celia MA, Bachu S, Nordbotten JM, Bandilla K (2015) Status of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resour Res 51(9):6846–6892. doi:10.1002/2015WR017609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang KW, Minkoff S, Bryant S (2008) Modeling leakage through faults of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) stored in an aquifer. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/115929-ms

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide, version 2.0, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasda SE, Bachu S, Celia MA (2004) Spatial characterization of the location of potentially leaky wells penetrating a deep saline aquifer in a mature sedimentary basin. Environ Geol 46(6–7):707–720. doi:10.1007/s00254-004-1073-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Nicolás A, Baù D, Cody BM, Alzraiee A (2015a) Stochastic and global sensitivity analyses of uncertain parameters affecting the safety of geological carbon storage in saline aquifers of the Michigan Basin. Int J Greenh Gas Control 37:99–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.008

  • González-Nicolás A, Baù D, Alzraiee A (2015b) Detection of potential leakage pathways from geological carbon storage by fluid pressure data assimilation. Adv Water Resour 86:366–384. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.10.006

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Applied geostatistics series. Oxford University Press on Demand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grana D, Mukerji T, Dovera L, Della Rossa E (2012) Sequential simulations of mixed discrete-continuous properties: sequential Gaussian mixture simulation. In: Abrahamsen P, Hauge R, Kolbjornsen O (eds) Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative geology and geostatistics, vol 17. Springer, Netherlands, pp 239–250

  • Hahn GJ (1967) Statistical models in engineering. Wiley series on systems engineering and analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliburton (1990) Log 21101375660000 Stech Upper Half (Date: 09/04/1990)

  • International Energy Agency (2008) Carbon capture and storage: meeting the challenge of climate change. IEA/OECD, Paris

  • Kopp A, Binning PJ, Johannsen K, Helmig R, Class H (2010) A contribution to risk analysis for leakage through abandoned wells in geological \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage. Adv Water Resour 33(8):867–879. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDEQOGD (2014) Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Oil and Gas Database. http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-6132_6828-98518--,00.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2014

  • Metz B, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III (2005) IPCC Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge

  • Nicholls N, Gruza G, Jouzel J, Karl T, Ogallo L, Parker D (1996) Observed climate variability and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogues JP, Court B, Dobossy M, Nordbotten JM, Celia MA (2012) A methodology to estimate maximum probable leakage along old wells in a geological sequestration operation. Int J Greenh Gas Control 7:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, Bachu S, Dahle HK (2005) Semianalytical solution for \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) leakage through an abandoned well. Environ Sci Technol 39(2):602–611. doi:10.1021/es035338i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbotten JM, Kavetski D, Celia MA, Bachu S (2009) Model for \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):743–749. doi:10.1021/Es801135v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW (2003) Global constraints on reservoir leakage. In: Gale J, Kaya Y (eds) Greenhouse gas control technologies—6th international conference. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 267–272. doi:10.1016/B978-008044276-1/50043-X

  • Ruether JA (1998) FETC programs for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (No. DOE/FETC-98/1058). USDOE Federal Energy Technology Center, Pittsburgh

  • Sakamoto Y, Tanaka A, Tenma N, Komai T (2011) Numerical study on flow behavior of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) in an aquifer for risk assessment of carbon capture and storage. Energy Procedia 4:4170–4177. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCH (1983) Log 21101365880000 Burch Main Suite (Date 06/19/1983)

  • SCH (1991) Log 21101375660000 Stech Lower Half (Date: 06/29/1991)

  • Schlumberger (2010) Eclipse technical description, v. 2010.1, Report, Abingdon, UK

  • Solomon S, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group I (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Trebin FA (1945) Permeability to oil of sandstone reservoir. Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpening R, Toksöz M, Born AE (1992) Reservoir delineation consortium annual report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Oldenburg CM, Finsterle S (2010) Percolation-theory and fuzzy rule-based probability estimation of fault leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites. Environ Earth Sci 59(7):1447–1459. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0131-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Birkholzer JT, Mehnert E, Lin Y-F, Zhang K (2009) Modeling basin- and plume-scale processes of \({\text{ CO }_{2}}\) storage for full-scale deployment. Ground Water 48(4):494–514. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00657.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE Project: DE-FE0001830). The research conducted was also made possible with the support of Schlumberger Ltd., who kindly donated the reservoir simulation software suites PETREL and ECLIPSE. The research team is also grateful to Michigan Technological University’s Professor Roger Turpening for providing access to the data library regarding the Niagara formations to which this research has been applied, as well as continued support to the use of this library.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana González-Nicolás.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Nicolás, A., Baù, D. & Cody, B.M. Application of Binary Permeability Fields for the Study of \({\hbox {CO}_{2}}\) Leakage from Geological Carbon Storage in Saline Aquifers of the Michigan Basin. Math Geosci 50, 525–547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9706-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9706-x

Keywords

Navigation