Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 39–66 | Cite as

Joint High-Order Simulation of Spatially Correlated Variables Using High-Order Spatial Statistics

  • Ilnur MinniakhmetovEmail author
  • Roussos Dimitrakopoulos
Article

Abstract

Joint geostatistical simulation techniques are used to quantify uncertainty for spatially correlated attributes, including mineral deposits, petroleum reservoirs, hydrogeological horizons, environmental contaminants. Existing joint simulation methods consider only second-order spatial statistics and Gaussian processes. Motivated by the presence of relatively large datasets for multiple correlated variables that typically are available from mineral deposits and the effects of complex spatial connectivity between grades on the subsequent use of simulated realizations, this paper presents a new approach for the joint high-order simulation of spatially correlated random fields. First, a vector random function is orthogonalized with a new decorrelation algorithm into independent factors using the so-termed diagonal domination condition of high-order cumulants. Each of the factors is then simulated independently using a high-order univariate simulation method on the basis of high-order spatial cumulants and Legendre polynomials. Finally, attributes of interest are reconstructed through the back-transformation of the simulated factors. In contrast to state-of-the-art methods, the decorrelation step of the proposed approach not only considers the covariance matrix, but also high-order statistics to obtain independent non-Gaussian factors. The intricacies of the application of the proposed method are shown with a dataset from a multi-element iron ore deposit. The application shows the reproduction of high-order spatial statistics of available data by the jointly simulated attributes.

Keywords

High-order simulation Joint simulation Correlated variables Non-Gaussian variables Decorrelation Diagonal domination Multi-element mineral deposits 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was funded from NSERC Collaborative Research and Development Grant CRDPJ 411270, entitled “Developing new global stochastic optimization and high-order stochastic models for optimizing mining complexes with uncertainty”, NSERC Discovery Grant 239019, and the COSMO consortium of mining companies (AngloGold Ashanti, Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, De Beers, Kinross Gold, Newmont Mining and Vale).

References

  1. Almeida AS, Journel AG (1994) Joint simulation of multiple variables with a Markov-type co-regionalization. Math Geol 26(5):565–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arpat B, Caers J (2007) Stochastic simulation with patterns. Math Geosci 39:177–203Google Scholar
  3. Bandarian E, Mueller U, Ferreira J, Richardson S (2010) Transformation methods for multivariate geostatistical simulation - minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors and alternating columns diagonal centres. In: Advances in Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning: Old and New Dimensions in a Changing World, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, p 79–89Google Scholar
  4. Barnett R, Manchuk JG, Deutsch CV (2014) Projection pursuit multivariate transform. Math Geosci 46(3):337–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boucher A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2008) Block simulation of multiple correlated variables. Math Geosci 41:215–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boucher A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2012) Multivariate block-support simulation of the Yandi iron ore deposit, Western Australia. Math Geosci 44:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boogaart KGvd, Tolosana-Delgado R, Lehmann M, Mueller U (2014) On the joint multipoint simulation of discrete and continuous geometallurgical parameters. In: Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Symposium, Proceedings, Carlton. Australia, AusIMM, p 379–388Google Scholar
  8. Boogaart KGvd, Mueller U, Tolosana-Delgado R (2016) An affine equivariant multivariate normal score transform for compositional data. Math Geosci, p 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11004-016-9645-y
  9. Chatterjee S, Dimitrakopoulos R, Mustapha H (2012) Dimensional reduction of pattern-based simulation using wavelet analysis. Math Geosci 44:343–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiles JP, Delfiner P (2012) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chugunova TL, Hu LY (2008) Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math Geosci 40:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Comon P (1994) Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process 36:287–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David M (1988) Handbook of applied advance geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. De Laco S, Maggio S (2011) Validation techniques for geological patterns simulations based on variogram and multiple-point statistics. Math Geosci 43:483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vries LM, Carrera J, Falivene O, Gratacós O, Slooten LJ (2008) Application of multiple point geostatistics to non-stationary images. Math Geosci 41:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desbarats AJ, Dimitrakopoulos R (2000) Geostatistical simulation of regionalized pore-size distributions using min/max autocorrelation factors. Math Geol 32:919–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dimitrakopoulos R (2011) Stochastic optimization for strategic mine planning: a decade of developments. J Min Sci 47:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dimitrakopoulos R, Fonseca M (2003) Assessing risk in grade-tonnage curves in a complex copper deposit, Northern Brazil, based on an efficient joint simulation of multiple correlated variables. In: Camisani-Calzolari FA (ed) 31st International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Minerals Industries, Cape Town, South Africa, 14–16 May 2003Google Scholar
  19. Dimitrakopoulos R, Mustapha H, Gloaguen E (2010) High-order statistics of spatial random fields: exploring spatial cumulants for modeling complex non-Gaussian and non-linear phenomena. Math Geosci 42:65–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodfellow R, Consuegra FA, Dimitrakopoulos R, Lloyd T (2012) Quantifying multi-element and volumetric uncertainty, Coleman McCreedy deposit, Ontario, Canada. Comput Geosci 42:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Honarkhah M (2011) Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyvärinen A (1999) Independent component analysis for time-dependent stochastic processes. ICANN 98 Perspectives in Neural Computing, p 135–140Google Scholar
  23. Journel AG (2005) Beyond covariance: the advent of multiple-point geostatistics. In: Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Journel AG (2007) Roadblocks to the evaluation of ore reserves—the simulation overpass and putting more geology into numerical models of deposits. In: Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Uncertainty and Risk Management, 2nd Edn. The AusIMM, Spectrum Series 14Google Scholar
  25. Journel AG, Huijbregts C (1978) Min Geostat. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiers HAL (2000) Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis. J Chemom 14:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lebedev NN (1965) Special functions and their applications. Prentice-Hall Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Leuangthong O, Deutsch CV (2003) Stepwise conditional transformation for simulation of multiple variables. Math Geol 35:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li L, Srinivasan S, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2013) Simultaneous estimation of geologic and reservoir state variables within an ensemble-based multiple-point statistic framework. Math Geosci 46:597–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lochbühler T, Pirot G, Straubhaar J, Linde N (2013) Conditioning of multiple-point statistics facies simulations to tomographic images. Math Geosci 46:625–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maleki M, Emery X (2015) Joint simulation of grade and rock type in a stratabound copper deposit. Math Geosci 47:471–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mariethoz G, Renard P (2010) Reconstruction of incomplete data sets or images using direct sampling. Math Geosci 42:245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J (2010) The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res 46Google Scholar
  34. Morton J (2010) Scalable implicit symmetric tensor approximation, preprint. Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  35. Morton J, Lim LH (2010) Principal cumulant components analysis, preprint. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Mueller UA, Ferreira J (2012) The U-WEDGE transformation method for multivariate geostatistical simulation. Math Geosci 44:427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mueller UA, Tolosana-Delgado R, van den Boogaart KG (2014) Approaches to the simulation of compositional data—a nickel-laterite comparative case study. In: Proceedings of Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Symposium, AusIMM, Melbourne, p 61–72Google Scholar
  38. Mustapha H, Chatterjee S, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) CDFSIM: efficient stochastic simulation through decomposition of cumulative distribution functions of transformed spatial patterns. Math Geosci 46:95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mustapha H, Dimitrakopoulos R (2010) High-order stochastic simulations for complex non-Gaussian and non-linear geological patterns. Math Geosci 42:455–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mustapha H, Dimitrakopoulos R, Chatterjee S (2011) Geologic heterogeneity representation using high-order spatial cumulants for subsurface flow and transport simulations. Water Resour Res 47(8). doi: 10.1029/2010WR009515
  41. Osterholt V, Dimitrakopoulos R (2007) Simulation of wireframes and geometric features with multiple-point techniques: application at Yandi iron ore deposit. In: Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning, 2nd edn. AusIMM, Spectrum Series, 14, p 95–124Google Scholar
  42. Perry JM (1977) A class of conjugate gradient algorithms with a two-step variable-metric memory. Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston (discussion paper 269) Google Scholar
  43. Rezaee H, Mariethoz G, Koneshloo M, Asghari O (2013) Multiple-point geostatistical simulation using the bunch-pasting direct sampling method. Comput Geosci 54:293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rondon O (2012) Teaching aid: minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors for joint simulation of attributes. Math Geosci 44:469–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenblatt M (1985) Stationary sequences and random fields. Birkhauser, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Savas B, Lim LH (2009) Quasi-Newton methods on Grassmannians and multilinear approximations of tensors. SIAM J Sci Comput 32:3352–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soares A (2001) Direct sequential simulation and co-simulation. Math Geol 33:911–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Straubhaar J, Renard P, Mariethoz G, Froidevaux R, Besson O (2011) An improved parallel multiple-point algorithm using a list approach. Math Geosci 43:305–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strebelle S, Cavelius C (2013) Solving speed and memory issues in multiple-point statistics simulation program SNESIM. Math Geosci 46:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Switzer P, Green AA (1984) Min/max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imaging. Technical report no. 6, Department of Statistics, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  51. Tahmasebi P, Hezarkhani A, Sahimi M (2012) Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions. Comput Geosci 16:779–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Toftaker H, Tjelmeland H (2013) Construction of binary multi-grid Markov random field prior models from training images. Math Geosci 45:383–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verly GW (1993) Sequential Gaussian co-simulation: a simulation method integrating several types of information. Quant Geol Geostat. In: Geostatistics Tróia 92, Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  54. Wackernagel H (1998) Principal component analysis for autocorrelated data: a geostatistical perspective. In: Technical report no. 22/98/G, Centre de Géostatistique, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  55. Welling M (2005) Robust higher-order statistics. In: Proc. 10th Int Workshop Artif Intell Statist, p 405–412Google Scholar
  56. Zhang T, Switzer P, Journel A (2006) Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation. Math Geol 38:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang T (2015) MPS-driven digital rock modeling and upscaling. Math Geol 47:937–954Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining and Materials EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.COSMO-Stochastic Mine Planning LaboratoryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations