Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 285–303 | Cite as

Quantifying the Directional Connectivity of Rock Constituents and its Impact on Electrical Resistivity of Organic-Rich Mudrocks

  • Huangye Chen
  • Zoya Heidari


Quantifying the hydrocarbon transport mechanism in organic-rich mudrocks is still a challenge. Scientific consensus holds that directional connectivity of organic matter within organic-rich mudrocks significantly affects production in such unconventional reservoirs. Furthermore, directional connectivity of matrix constituents has a significant impact on the physical properties of organic-rich mudrocks such as electrical resistivity. The latter causes a significant uncertainty in assessment of petrophysical properties such as hydrocarbon saturation. A quantitative approach is, however, required to improve formation evaluation of organic-rich mudrocks. This paper first introduces a method to quantify directional connectivity of the matrix constituents. Electrical resistivity of three-dimensional pore-scale rock images is then numerically estimated using the finite difference method. The results of numerical simulations for synthetic organic-rich mudrocks with different levels of directional connectivity of kerogen network confirmed that (a) the presence of conductive mature kerogen can significantly impact the electrical resistivity of the rock in different directions and the corresponding estimates of fluid saturations and (b) the directional connectivity of the kerogen network has a measurable impact on the electrical resistivity of the rock. The synthetic examples, including pyrite, confirm that pyrite’s presence and its directional connectivity affects the electrical resistivity of the rock even in low concentrations. Neglecting the presence of conductive kerogen and pyrite can result in up to a 17.9 and 23 % overestimate in water saturation, respectively. The results show up to 31 and 37 % variation in electrical resistivity caused by variation in directional connectivity (i.e., ranging from dispersed to layered distribution) of kerogen and pyrite networks, respectively. Furthermore, a measurable difference was observed in effective electrical resistivity of organic-rich mudrocks between the horizontal and vertical directions. Finally, the results confirm the importance of taking into account anisotropy and directional connectivity of conductive rock components for enhanced assessment of hydrocarbon saturation in organic-rich mudrocks.


Directional connectivity Tortuosity Electrical resistivity  Organic-rich mudrocks 



The work reported in this paper was funded by the Texas A&M University Joint Industry Research Program on Multi-Scale Formation Evaluation, jointly sponsored by Aramco Services Company, BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Devon Energy. Our sincere gratitude goes to Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) for supporting this project via Junior Faculty Research Initiation Award and American Chemical Society (ACS) through ACS PRF Doctoral New Investigator (DNI) Research Grant. Finally, we thank the Texas A&M Supercomputing Facility for providing computing resources used for the numerical simulations in this paper.


  1. Abraitis PK, Pattrick RAD, Vaughan DJ (2004) Variations in the compositional, textural, and electrical properties of natural pyrite: a review. Int J Miner Process 74(1–4):41–59Google Scholar
  2. Alfred D, Vernik L (2012) A new petrophysical model for organic shales. In: Paper presented at the 53rd annual logging symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, Cartagena, Colombia, June 16–20Google Scholar
  3. Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Min Metallurg Eng 146(1):54–62Google Scholar
  4. Bond C (2011) An efficient and versatile flood fill algorithm for raster scan displays. PDF file.
  5. Clavier C, Coates G, Dumanoir J (1984) Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands. SPE J 24(2):153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis M, Sinha M, Parr R (2010) Role of fine-scale layering and grain alignment in the electrical anisotropy of marine sediments. First Break 28(9):49–57Google Scholar
  7. Garing C, Luquot L, Pezard P, Gouze P (2014) Electrical and flow properties of highly heterogeneous carbonate rocks. Bull Am Assoc Petrol Geol 1(98):49–66Google Scholar
  8. Jouniaux L, Zamora M, Reuschlé T (2006) Electrical conductivity evolution of non-saturated carbonate rocks during deformation up to failure. Geophys J Int 167(2):1017–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kethireddy N, Chen H, Heidari Z (2014) Quantifying the effect of kerogen on resistivity measurements in organic-rich rocks. Petrophysics 55(3):136–146Google Scholar
  10. Li L, Meller G, Kosina H (2007) Temperature and field-dependence of hopping conduction in organic semiconductors. Microelectron J 38(1):47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mao J, Fang X, Lan Y, Schimmelmann A, Mastalerz M, Xu L, Schmidt-Rohr K (2010) Chemical and nanometer-scale structure of kerogen and its change during thermal maturation investigated by advanced solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74(7):2110–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng D, Ma T, Geng C, Sun Y (2012) Test method and experimental research on resistance of oil shale under high temperature. Global Geol 15(3):245–251Google Scholar
  13. Nabawy BS, Rochette P, Géraud Y (2010) Electric pore fabric of the Nubia sandstones in south Egypt: characterization and modelling. Geophys J Int 183(2):681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakashima Y, Kamiya S (2007) Mathematica programs for the analysis of three-dimensional pore connectivity and anisotropic tortuosity of porous rocks using X-ray computed tomography image data. J Nucl Sci Technol 44(9):1233–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Passey QR, Bohacs K, Esch WL, Klimentidis R, Sinha S (2010) From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale-gas reservoirs. In: Paper SPE 144062 presented at the international oil and gas conference and exhibition in China, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Beijing, China, June 8–10Google Scholar
  16. Press W, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York. ISBN 978-0-521-88068-8Google Scholar
  17. Rajeshwar K, Das M, Dubow J (1980) D.C. electrical conductivity of Green River oil shales. Nature 287:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Waxman MH, Smits LJ (1968) Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sand. SPE J 8(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Winsauer WO, Shearin HM, Masson PH, Williams M (1952) Resistivity of brine-saturated sands in relation to pore geometry. Bull Am Assoc Petrol Geol 36(2):253–277Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harold Vance Department of Petroleum EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations