Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 663–678 | Cite as

Fitting Multiple Bell Curves Stably and Accurately to a Time Series as Applied to Hubbert Cycles or Other Phenomena

  • James A. ConderEmail author
Article

Abstract

Bell curves are applicable to understanding many observations and measurements across the sciences. Relating Gaussian curves to data is a common because of its relation to both the Central Limit Theorem and to random error. Similarly, fitting logistic derivatives to oil or other non-renewable resource production is common practice. Fitting bell curves to a time series is an inherently non-linear problem requiring initial estimates of the parameters describing the bell-curves. Poor estimates lead to instability and divergent solutions. Fitting to a cumulative curve improves stability, but at the expense of accuracy of the final solution. Jointly fitting multiple bell curves is superior to extraction of curves one at a time, but further exacerbates the non-linearity. Including both the cumulative data and the bell-curve data within the inversion, can exploit the greater stability of the cumulative fit and the greater accuracy of a direct fit. The algorithm presented here inverts for multiple bells by combining cumulative and direct fits to exploit the best features of both. The versatility and accuracy of the algorithm are demonstrated using two different Earth Science examples: a seismo-volcanic sequence recorded by a hydrophone array moored to the seafloor and US coal production. The MatLab function used here for joint curve determination is included in the online manuscript complementary material.

Keywords

Gaussian Hubbert multicycles Curve-fitting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Del Bohnenstiehl for the seismo-volcanic azimuthal detection analysis. I thank Ken Anderson whose interest in Hubbert cycles first prompted my thoughts of the problem of simultaneously fitting multiple bell curves to complex systems. This work was improved by the thoughtful comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers as well as the journal editor, Roussos Dimitrakopoulos. This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation grant OCE-0825424.

Supplementary material

11004_2014_9557_MOESM1_ESM.txt (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (txt 17 KB)
11004_2014_9557_MOESM2_ESM.txt (2 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (txt 2 KB)
11004_2014_9557_MOESM3_ESM.m (3 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (m 231 KB)
11004_2014_9557_MOESM4_ESM.m (18 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (m 231 KB)

References

  1. Anderson KB, Conder JA (2011) Discussion of multicyclic hubbert modeling as a method for forecasting future petroleum production. Energy Fuels 25:1578–1584. doi: 10.1021/ef1012648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohnenstiehl DW, Dziak RP, Matsumoto H, Conder JA (2014) Acoustic response of submarine volcanoes in the Tofua arc and northern Lau basin to two great earthquakes. Geophys J Int 196:1657–1675. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt AR (2007) Testing Hubbert. Energy Policy 35:3074–3088. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conder JA, Forsyth DW (2000) Do the 1998 antarctic plate earthquake and its aftershocks delineate a plate boundary? Geophys Res Lett 27:2309–2312. doi: 10.1029/1999GL011126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deffeyes KS (2009) Hubbert’s peak: the impending world oil shortage, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Fong D, Saunders M (2010) LSMR: an iterative algorithm for sparse least-squares problems. Perform Comput 4026:21Google Scholar
  8. Gallagher B (2011) Peak oil analyzed with a logistic function and idealized Hubbert curve. Energy Policy 39:790–802. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goshtasby A, O’Neill WD (1994) Curve fitting by a sum of gaussians. CVGIP Graph Model Image Process 56:281–288. doi: 10.1006/cgip.1994.1025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IBM Corp (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. IBM Corp, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson DD (1972) Interpretation of Inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data. Geophys J Int 28:97–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1972.tb06115.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirkup L, Frenkel RB (2006) An introduction to uncertainty in measurement: using the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement). 248Google Scholar
  13. Laherrere JH (2000) Learn strengths, weaknesses to understand Hubbert curve. Oil Gas J 98 (Special Report)Google Scholar
  14. Liu C, Zhu J, Wang S, Liu W (2012) Oil production forecasts and their uncertainty analyses. Bull Can Pet Geol 60:158–165. doi: 10.2113/gscpgbull.60.3.158
  15. Menke W (2012) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory, 3rd edn. MATLAB Edition (International Geophysics Series). p 330Google Scholar
  16. Millman KJ, Aivazis M (2011) Python for scientists and engineers. Comput Sci Eng 13:9. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nashawi IS, Malallah A, Al-Bisharah M (2010) Forecasting world crude oil production using multicyclic Hubbert model. Energy Fuels 24:1788–1800. doi: 10.1021/ef901240p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paige CC, Saunders MA (1982) LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear-equations and sparse least-squares. ACM Trans Math Softw 8:43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patzek TW, Croft GD (2010) A global coal production forecast with multi-Hubbert cycle analysis. Energy 35:3109–3122. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rutledge D (2011) Estimating long-term world coal production with logit and probit transforms. Int J Coal Geol 85:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS Institute Inc (2000) SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  22. Sorrell S, Speirs J, Bentley R et al (2012) Shaping the global oil peak: a review of the evidence on field sizes, reserve growth, decline rates and depletion rates. Energy 37:709–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walsh S, Diamond D (1995) Non-linear curve fitting using microsoft excel solver. Talanta 42:561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations