Multiple-Point Simulation with an Existing Reservoir Model as Training Image
- 609 Downloads
The multiple-point simulation (MPS) method has been increasingly used to describe the complex geologic features of petroleum reservoirs. The MPS method is based on multiple-point statistics from training images that represent geologic patterns of the reservoir heterogeneity. The traditional MPS algorithm, however, requires the training images to be stationary in space, although the spatial distribution of geologic patterns/features is usually nonstationary. Building geologically realistic but statistically stationary training images is somehow contradictory for reservoir modelers. In recent research on MPS, the concept of a training image has been widely extended. The MPS approach is no longer restricted by the size or the stationarity of training images; a training image can be a small geometrical element or a full-field reservoir model. In this paper, the different types of training images and their corresponding MPS algorithms are first reviewed. Then focus is placed on a case where a reservoir model exists, but needs to be conditioned to well data. The existing model can be built by process-based, object-based, or any other type of reservoir modeling approach. In general, the geologic patterns in a reservoir model are constrained by depositional environment, seismic data, or other trend maps. Thus, they are nonstationary, in the sense that they are location dependent. A new MPS algorithm is proposed that can use any existing model as training image and condition it to well data. In particular, this algorithm is a practical solution for conditioning geologic-process-based reservoir models to well data.
KeywordsTraining image Nonstationarity Geologic-process-based model Kernel pdf Conditional probability Geostatistics
- Caers J, Zhang T (2004) Multiple-point geostatistics: a quantitative vehicle for integration of geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models. In: Integration of outcrop and modern analog data in reservoir models. AAPG memoir, vol 80, pp 383–394 Google Scholar
- Daly C, Caers J (2010) Multi-point geostatistics—an introductory overview. First Break 28(9):39–47 Google Scholar
- Guardiano F, Srivastava M (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia’92. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144 Google Scholar