Abstract
In some ore deposits, the grade distribution is heavy-tailed and high values make the inference of first- and second-order statistics nonrobust. In the case of gold data, high values are usually cut and the block estimation is performed using truncated grades. With this method, a part of the deposit is omitted, resulting in a potential bias on resources figures. Ad-hoc corrections can be applied on the final figures to take into account the tail of the grade distribution, but no theoretical guidelines are available. A geostatistical model has been developed to handle high values based on the assumption that for high grade zones, the only tangible information is the geometry. The grade variable z can be split into three parts: the truncated grade (\(\operatorname{Min} (z, z_{\mathrm{e}})\) where z e is the top-cut grade), a weighted indicator above top-cut grade (1{z≥z e}), and a residual. Within this framework, the residual is poorly structured, and in most cases is a pure nugget-effect. Moreover, it has no spatial correlation with the truncated grade and the indicator above top-cut grade. This decomposition makes the variographic study more robust because variables (indicator and truncated grade) do not keep high grade values. The underlying hypotheses can be tested on experimental indicator variograms and the top-cut grade can be justified. Finally, the estimation is based on a truncated grade and indicator cokriging. The model is applied to blast holes from a gold deposit and on a simulated example. Both cases illustrate the benefits of keeping the high values in the estimation process via an appropriate mathematical model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong M (1984) Common problems seen in variograms. Math Geol 16(3):305–313
Beirlant J, Goegebeur Y, Teugels J, Segers J, De Waal D, Ferro C (2004) Statistics of extremes, theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester
Caers J, Rombouts L (1996) Valuation of primary diamond deposits by extreme value statistics. Econ Geol 91(5):841–854
Chilès J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics, modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York
Costa JF (2003) Reducing the impact of outliers in ore reserves estimation. Math Geol 35(3):323–345
David M (1988) Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Hawkins DM, Cressie N (1984) Robust kriging—a proposal. Math Geol 16(1):3–17
Matheron G (1982) La destructuration des hautes teneurs et le krigeage des indicatrices (The destructuring of high grades and indicator kriging). Technical Report N-761, Centre de Géostatistique, Fontainebleau, France
Parker HM (1991) Statistical treatment of outlier data in epithermal gold deposit reserve estimation. Math Geol 23(2):175–199
Rivoirard J (1994) Introduction to disjunctive kriging and nonlinear geostatistics. Clarendon, Oxford
Verly G (1984) The block distribution given a point multivariate normal distribution. In: Verly G, David M, Journel AG, Maréchal A (eds) Geostatistics for natural resources characterization. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 495–515
Woillez M, Rivoirard J, Fernandes PG (2009) Evaluating the uncertainty of abundance estimates from acoustic surveys using geostatistical simulations. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1377–1383
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivoirard, J., Demange, C., Freulon, X. et al. A Top-Cut Model for Deposits with Heavy-Tailed Grade Distribution. Math Geosci 45, 967–982 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9401-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9401-x