Skip to main content
Log in

Asymptotic Dykstra–Parsons Distribution, Estimates and Confidence Intervals

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sample Dykstra–Parsons (DP) coefficient, the most popular heterogeneity static measure among petroleum engineers, may exhibit significant sampling errors. Moreover, approximations of its probability distributions (uncertainty estimates) are only available for specific families of permeability models (e.g., log-normal). The cited probability distributions allow for the specification of confidence intervals and other inferences for the theoretical DP, which will be useful for reservoir screening purposes, or to establish if a more detailed study is justified. This paper presents the development of an asymptotic approximation of the distribution of the sample Dykstra–Parsons coefficient, which is independent of the permeability probability distribution. The effectiveness (bias and confidence intervals) of the proposed approach is demonstrated using analytical and field case studies and by comparing the results gleaned with those obtained using a well-known parametric approximation, under different scenarios of reservoir maturity levels (i.e., number of wells) and different degrees of deviation from the log-normal probability density function assumption. The results show that, in the vast majority of the case studies, the proposed approach outperformed the parametric approximation; in particular, our approach resulted in a significant reduction of the bias and the confidence intervals always including the theoretical DP coefficient. In addition, an excellent agreement was observed between the asymptotic cumulative distribution of the DP coefficient and the corresponding empirical distribution for sample sizes as small as one hundred, which suggests that high success rates can be obtained when reservoirs are classified according to the asymptotic DP coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adewusi V (2002) EWAN C-2/C-3 polymer flood: performance predictions. Pet Sci Technol, 20(5–6):441–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alajmi A, Gharbi R, Algharaib M (2009) Investigating the performance of hot water injection in geostatistically generated permeable media. J Pet Sci Eng 66(3–4):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossie-Codreanu D, Le Gallo Y (2004) A simulation method for the rapid screening of potential depleted oil reservoirs for CO2 sequestration. Energy 29(9–10):1347–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference. Duxbury, Scituate

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer H (1999) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order statistics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra H, Parsons RL (1950) The prediction of oil recovery by water flood. In: American Petroleum Institute, Secondary Recovery of Oil in the United States, 2nd edn. API, Dallas, pp 160–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin DJ, Chandeler MA, Kocurek G, Lake LW (1988) Patterns of permeability in Eolian deposits. SPE Form Eval 3(2):297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Currie I (1988) Improving performance prediction by more accurate heterogeneity assessment. SPE 17364, presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, OK, April 17–20, 1988

  • Jensen JL, Currie I (1990) A new method for estimating the Dykstra-Parsons coefficient to characterize reservoir heterogeneity. SPE Reserv Eng 3(7):369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Lake LW (1988) The influence of sample size and permeability distribution on heterogeneity measures. SPE Reserv Eng 3(2):629–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Lake LW, Hinkley DV (1987) A statistical study of reservoir permeability: distributions, correlations and averages. SPE Form Eval 2(4):461–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake LW, Jensen JL (1991) A review of heterogeneity measures used in reservoir characterization. In Situ, 15(4):409–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert ME (1981) A statistical study of reservoir heterogeneity. MS Thesis, University of Texas at Austin

  • Lilliefors H (1967) On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 62:399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschio C, Schiozer D (2003) A new upscaling technique based on Dykstra–Parsons coefficient: evaluation with streamline reservoir simulation. J Pet Sci Eng 40(1–2):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy S, Rubin E (2009) The effect of high oil prices on EOR project economics. Energy Procedia 1(1):4143–4150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergany M (2007) Geological and statistical reservoir characteristics of the Late Carboniferous-Permian. Masters Abstr Int 46(1)

  • Parzen E (1962) On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Ann Math Stat 33:1065–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nestor V. Queipo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pintos, S., Bohorquez, C. & Queipo, N.V. Asymptotic Dykstra–Parsons Distribution, Estimates and Confidence Intervals. Math Geosci 43, 329–343 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9327-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9327-8

Keywords

Navigation