Skip to main content
Log in

Robust Resampling Confidence Intervals for Empirical Variograms

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variogram function is an important measure of the spatial dependencies of a geostatistical or other spatial dataset. It plays a central role in kriging, designing spatial studies, and in understanding the spatial properties of geological and environmental phenomena. It is therefore important to understand the variability attached to estimates of the variogram. Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals around the empirical variogram either rely on strong assumptions, such as normality or known variogram function, or are based on resampling blocks and subject to edge effect biases. This paper proposes two new procedures for addressing these concerns: a quasi-block-bootstrap and a quasi-block-jackknife. The new methods are based on transforming the data to decorrelate it based on a fitted variogram model, resampling blocks from the decorrelated data, and then recorrelating. The coverage properties of the new confidence intervals are compared by simulation to a number of existing resampling-based intervals. The proposed quasi-block-jackknife confidence interval is found to have the best properties of all of the methods considered across a range of scenarios, including normally and lognormally distributed data and misspecification of the variogram function used to decorrelate the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiles J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modelling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RG, Allingham S (2010) Further simulation results on the robustness of resampling confidence intervals for empirical variograms. University of Wollongong Centre for Statistical and Survey Methodology Working Paper 02-10. http://www.cssm.uow.edu.au and http://ro.uow.edu.au/

  • Cosh MH, Stedinger J, Brutsaert W (2003) Time changes in spatial structure of surface variability in the southern great plains. Adv Water Resour 26:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Hawkins D (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12(2):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison A, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd P (1984) The variogram and kriging: robust and resistant estimators. In: Geostatistics for natural resource characterization. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery X (2007) Reducing fluctuations in the sample variogram. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21(4):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues S, Allard D, Baret F, Weiss M (2006) Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models. Remote Sens Environ 103:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascuel-Odoux C, Boivin P (1994) Variability of variograms and spatial estimates due to soil sampling: a case study. Geoderma 62:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1985) Resampling a coverage pattern. Stoch Process Appl 20:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Snepvangers J, Bouten W, Heuvelink G (2003) Monitoring temporal development of spatial soil water content variation: comparison of ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J 2(4):519–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch HR (1989) The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Math Stat 17(3):1217–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri S (2003) Resampling methods for dependent data. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM (2000) A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. Eur J Soil Sci 51:137–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant B, Lark R (2004) Estimating variogram uncertainty. Math Geol 36(8):867–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(2):1246–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M, Webster R (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlather M (2006) RandomFields: Simulation and analysis of random fields. R package version 1.3.29

  • Sebastyén Z (2004) Uncertainty investigation of the semivariogram by means of the bootstrap method. Acta Geol Hung 47(1):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer J, Varljen M (1990) Approximation of confidence limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random fields. Water Resour Res 26(8):1787–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow A (1985) Bootstrapping correlated data. Math Geol 17(7):769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Schucany W, Woodward W, Gunst R (2006) A parametric spatial bootstrap. Technical Report SMU-TR-337, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas

  • Wang L, Okin GS, Caylor KK, Macko SA (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and sources of soil carbon in southern African savannas. Geoderma 149:402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingle W, Poeter E (1993) Uncertainty associated with semivariograms used for site simulation. Ground Water 31(5):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Graham Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, R.G., Allingham, S. Robust Resampling Confidence Intervals for Empirical Variograms. Math Geosci 43, 243–259 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9314-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9314-5

Keywords

Navigation