Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 643–659 | Cite as

Wavelet Analysis and Filtering to Identify Dominant Orientations of Permeability Anisotropy

  • Loring Watkins
  • Roseanna M. Neupauer
  • Gilbert P. Compo
Special Issue


An accurate representation of permeability anisotropy is needed to model the rate and direction of groundwater flow correctly. We develop a wavelet analysis technique that can be used to characterize principal directions of anisotropy in both stationary and non-stationary permeability fields. Wavelet analysis involves the integral transform of a field using a wavelet as a kernel. The wavelet is shifted, scaled, and rotated to analyze different locations, sizes, and orientations of the field. The wavelet variance is used to identify scales and orientations that dominate the field. If the field is non-stationary, such that different zones of the field are characterized by different dominant scales or orientations, the wavelet variance can identify all dominant scales and orientations if they are distinct. If the dominant scales and orientations of different zones are similar, the wavelet variance identifies only the dominant scale and orientation of the primary zone. In this paper, we present a combined wavelet analysis and filtering approach to identify all dominant scales and orientations in a non-stationary permeability field. We apply the method to permeability data obtained in the laboratory from the Massillon sandstone.


Heterogeneity Non-stationary Morlet wavelet Permeability Anisotropy Wavelet analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderman ER, Kipp KL, Hill MC, Valstar, Neupauer RM (2002) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. geological survey modular ground-water model—documentation of the model-layer variable-direction horizontal anisotropy (LVDA) capability of the hydrogeologic-unit flow (HUF) package. U.S. Geological Survey, Open file Report 02-409 Google Scholar
  2. Antoine J, Murenzi R, Vandergheynst P, Ali ST (2004) Two-dimensional wavelet and their relatives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  3. Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier, New York Google Scholar
  4. Beckwith CW, Baird AJ, Heathwaite AL (2003) Anisotropy and depth-related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a bog peat. II: Modelling the effects on groundwater flow. Hydrol Process 17:103–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton WC, Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Lindsey BD, Gburek WJ (2002) Influence of fracture anisotropy on groundwater ages and chemistry, Valley and Ridge Province, Pennsylvania. Ground Water 40(3):242–257 Google Scholar
  6. Candès EJ, Donoho DL (1999) Ridgelets: a key to higher-dimensional intermittency? Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 357:2495–2509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XH, Chen X (2003) Effects of aquifer anisotropy on the migration of infiltrated stream water to a pumping well. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 8(5):287–293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chui CK (1992) An introduction to wavelets. Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
  9. Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia Google Scholar
  10. Donoho DL, Flesia AG (2003) Digital ridgelet transform based on true ridge functions. In: Welland GV (ed.) Beyond wavelets. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–30 Google Scholar
  11. Farge M (1992) Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:395–457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Genereux D, Bandopadhyay I (2001) Numerical investigation of lake bed seepage patterns: effects of porous medium and lake properties. J Hydrol 241(3–4):283–303 Google Scholar
  13. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
  14. Kumar P, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1997) Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Rev Geophys 35(4):385–412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lark RM, Webster R (2004) Analysing soil variation in two dimensions with the discrete wavelet transform. Eur J Soil Sci 55:777–797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neupauer RM, Powell KL, Qi X, Lee DH, Villhauer DA (2006) Characterization of permeability anisotropy using wavelet analysis. Water Resour Res 42:W07419. doi:10.1029/2005WR004364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell KL (2004) Wavelet analysis of permeability anisotropy. Master’s Thesis, University of Virginia, 89 pp Google Scholar
  18. Tidwell VC, Wilson JL (2000) Heterogeneity, permeability patterns, and permeability upscaling: physical characterization of a block of Massillon Sandstone exhibiting nested scales of heterogeneity. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 3(4):283–291 Google Scholar
  19. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loring Watkins
    • 1
  • Roseanna M. Neupauer
    • 2
  • Gilbert P. Compo
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  3. 3.CIRES/Climate Diagnostics Center, and NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory/Physical Sciences DivisionUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations