Skip to main content
Log in

A Distance-based Prior Model Parameterization for Constraining Solutions of Spatial Inverse Problems

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial inverse problems in the Earth Sciences are often ill-posed, requiring the specification of a prior model to constrain the nature of the inverse solutions. Otherwise, inverted model realizations lack geological realism. In spatial modeling, such prior model determines the spatial variability of the inverse solution, for example as constrained by a variogram, a Boolean model, or a training image-based model. In many cases, particularly in subsurface modeling, one lacks the amount of data to fully determine the nature of the spatial variability. For example, many different training images could be proposed for a given study area. Such alternative training images or scenarios relate to the different possible geological concepts each exhibiting a distinctive geological architecture. Many inverse methods rely on priors that represent a single subjectively chosen geological concept (a single variogram within a multi-Gaussian model or a single training image). This paper proposes a novel and practical parameterization of the prior model allowing several discrete choices of geological architectures within the prior. This method does not attempt to parameterize the possibly complex architectures by a set of model parameters. Instead, a large set of prior model realizations is provided in advance, by means of Monte Carlo simulation, where the training image is randomized. The parameterization is achieved by defining a metric space which accommodates this large set of model realizations. This metric space is equipped with a “similarity distance” function or a distance function that measures the similarity of geometry between any two model realizations relevant to the problem at hand. Through examples, inverse solutions can be efficiently found in this metric space using a simple stochastic search method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JRL (1978) Studies in fluviatile sedimentation: an exploratory quantitative model for the architecture of avulsion-controlled alluvial suites. Sediment Geol 21(2):129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpat BG (2005). Sequential simulation with patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 166 p

  • Bridge JS, Leeder MR (1979) A simulation model of alluvial stratigraphy. Sedimentology 26(5):617–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J (2003) History matching under a training image-based geological model constraint. SPE J 8(3):218–226, SPE #74716

    Google Scholar 

  • Caers J, Hoffman T (2006) The probability perturbation method—a new look at Bayesian inverse modeling. Math Geol 38(1):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J, Strebelle S, Payrazyan K (2003) Stochastic integration of seismic data and geologic scenarios: a West Africa submarine channel saga. Lead Edge 22(3):192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J, Hoffman T, Strebelle S, Wen HW (2006) Probabilistic integration of geologic scenarios, seismic, and production data—a West Africa turbidite reservoir case study. Lead Edge 25(3):240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro S, Caers J, Otterlei C, Hoye T, Andersen T, Gomel P (2006) A probabilistic integration of well log, geological information, 3D/4D seismic and production data: Application to the Oseberg field. In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, SPE #103152

  • Christie M, Demyanov V, Erbas D (2006) Uncertainty qualification for porous media flows. J Comput Phys 217(1):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu L, Reynolds AC, Oliver DS (1995) Reservoir description from static and well-test data using efficient gradient methods. In: Proceedings of SPE international meeting on petroleum engineering, Beijing, SPE #29999

  • Demyanov V, Subbey S, Christie M (2004) Uncertainty assessment in PUNQ-S3: Neighbourhood algorithm framework for geostatistical modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Cannes, France

  • Deutsch CV, Wang L (1996) Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs. Math Geol 28(7), 857–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubuisson MP, Jain AK (1994) A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on pattern recognition, Jerusalem, vol A, pp 566–568

  • Georgsen F, More H (1993) Combining fiber processes and Gaussian random functions for modeling fluvial reservoirs. In: Soares A. (ed.) Geostatistics Troia’92. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 425–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardiano F, Srivastava RM (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares A (ed.) Geostatistics Troia’92. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, vol 1, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman TB, Strebelle S, Wen X-H, Caers J (2005) Geologically consistent history matching of a deepwater turbidite reservoir. In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, SPE #95557

  • Holden L, Hauge R, Skare O, Skorstad A (1998) Modeling of fluvial reservoirs with object models. Math Geol 30(5):473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L-Y, Blanc G, Noetinger B (2001) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of sequential simulations. Math Geol 33:475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TY, Seinfeld JH (1987) Estimation of two-phase petroleum reservoir properties by regularization. J Comput Phys 69:397–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Reynolds AC, Oliver DS (2003) History matching of three-phase flow production data. SPE J 8(4):328–340, SPE #87336

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey SC, Bridge JS (1995) Three-dimensional model of alluvial stratigraphy: Theory and application. J Sediment Res B 65(1):7–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharaja A (2006) Assessing uncertainty on net-to-gross at the appraisal stage: application to a West Africa deep-water reservoir. Unpublished SCRF report 16, Stanford University

  • Mosegaard K, Tarantola A (1995) Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. J Geophys Res B 100:12431–12447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DS, He N, Reynolds AC (1996) Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data. In: Leoben M, Heinemann ZE, Kriebernegg M (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Leoben, pp 259–269

  • Omre H, Tjelmeland H (1996) Petroleum geostatistics. In: Baafi EY, Schofield NA (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th international geostatistics congress, Wollongong, Australia, vol 1, pp 41–52

  • Sambridge M (1999a) Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm—I: Searching a parameter space. Geophys J Int 138(2):479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambridge M (1999b) Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm—II: Appraising the ensemble. Geophys J Int 138(3):727–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point geostatistics. Math Geol 34:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S (2007) Integrated evaluation of structural uncertainty using history matching from seismic imaging uncertainty model. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, California, USA

  • Suzuki S, Caers J (2006) History matching with an uncertain geological scenario. In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, SPE #102154

  • Suzuki S, Caers J, Caumon G (2007). History matching of reservoir structure subject to prior geophysical and geological constraints. In: EAGE conference on petroleum geostatistics, Cascais, Portugal, September 10–14, 2007

  • Tarantola A (1987) Inverse problem theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 358 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjelmeland H, Besag J (1998) Markov random fields with higher order interactions. Scand J Statist 25:415–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viseur S (1999) Stochastic boolean simulation of fluvial deposits: a new approach combining accuracy and efficiency. In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, SPE #56688

  • Yamada T, Okano Y (2005) A volcanic reservoir: facies distribution model accounting for pressure communication. In: Proceedings of SPE Asia pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Jakarta, SPE #93159

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jef Caers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, S., Caers, J. A Distance-based Prior Model Parameterization for Constraining Solutions of Spatial Inverse Problems. Math Geosci 40, 445–469 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9154-8

Keywords

Navigation