Skip to main content
Log in

Data Configurations and the Cokriging System: Simplification by Screen Effects

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large cokriging systems arise in many situations and are difficult to handle in practice. Simplifications such as simple kriging, strictly collocated and multicollocated cokriging are often used and models under which such simplifications are, in fact, equivalent to cokriging have recently received attention. In this paper, a two-dimensional second-order stationary random process with known mean is considered and the redundancy of certain components of the data at certain locations vis-à-vis the solution to the simple cokriging system is examined. Conditions for the simple cokriging weights of these components at these locations are set to zero. The conditions generalise the notion of the autokrigeability coefficient and can, in principle, be applied to any data configuration. In specific sampling situations such as the isotopic and certain heterotropic configurations, models under which simple kriging, strictly collocated, multicollocated and dislocated cokriging are equivalent to simple cokriging are readily identified and results already available in the literature are obtained. These are readily identified and the results are already available in the literature. The advantage of the approach presented here is that it can be applied to any data configuration for analysis of permissible simplifications in simple cokriging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiles JP, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainity. Wiley, New York, 659 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel A (1999) Markov models for cross-covariances. Math Geol 31(8):955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1979) Recherche de simplification dans une probleme de cokrigage. Technical report N-628, Centre de Geostatistique, Fontainebleau, France, 19 p

  • Myers DE (1982) Matrix formulation of cokriging. Math Geol 14(3):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (2001) Which models for collocated cokriging? Math Geol 33(2):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (2002) On the structural link between variables in kriging with external drift. Math Geol 34(7):797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (2004) On some simplifications of the cokriging neighbourhood. Math Geol 36(8):899–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmaryan LE, Journel A (1999) Two Markov models and their applications. Math Geol 31(8):965–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam A, Pandalai HS (2004) On the equivalence of the cokriging and kriging systems. Math Geol 36(4):507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (1995). Multivariate geostatistics: An introduction with applications, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, 256 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Tran TT, Srivastava RM, Journel AG (1992) Integrating seismic data in reservoir modeling: The collocated cokriging alternative. SPE paper 24742, 67th annual technical conference and exhibition, pp 833–842

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. S. Pandalai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Subramanyam, A., Pandalai, H.S. Data Configurations and the Cokriging System: Simplification by Screen Effects. Math Geosci 40, 425–443 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9153-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9153-9

Keywords

Navigation