Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Scale Texture Modeling

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patterns of crystallographic preferred orientation are referred to as texture. The specific subject of texture analysis is the experimental determination and interpretation of the statistical distribution of orientations of crystals within a specimen of polycrystalline material, which could be metals or rocks. The objective is to relate an observed pattern of preferred orientation to its generating processes and vice versa. In geosciences, texture of minerals in rocks is used to infer constraints on their tectono-metamorphic history. Since most physical properties of crystals, such as elastic moduli, the coefficients of thermal expansion, or chemical resistance to etching depends on crystal symmetry and orientation, the presence of texture imparts directional properties to the polycrystalline material.

A major issue of mathematical texture analysis is the resolution of the inverse problem to determine a reasonable orientation density function on SO(3) from measured pole intensities on \(\mathbb {S}^{2}\times \mathbb {S}^{2}\) , which relates to the inverse of the totally geodesic Radon transform. This communication introduces a wavelet approach into mathematical texture analysis. Wavelets on the two-dimensional sphere \(\mathbb {S}^{2}\) and on the rotational group SO(3) are discussed, and an algorithms for a wavelet decomposition on both domains following the ideas of Ta-Hsin Li is given. The relationship of these wavelets on both domains with respect to the totally geodesic Radon transform is investigated. In particular, it is shown that the Radon transform of these wavelets on SO(3) are again wavelets on \(\mathbb {S}^{2}\) . A novel algorithm for the inversion of experimental pole intensities to an orientation density function based on this relationship is developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein S, Schaeben H (2005) A one-dimensional radon transform on SO(3) and their application to texture goniometry. Math Methods Appl Sci 28:1269–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge HJ (1965) Zur Darstellung allgemeiner Texturen. Z Metallk 56:872–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlke S, Dahmen W, Weinreich I, Schmitt E (1995) Multiresolution analysis and wavelets on S 2 and S 3. Numer Funct Anal Optim 16(1–2):19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esling C, Muller J, Bunge HJ (1982) An integral formula expressing the even part \(\tilde{f}(g)\) in terms of f(g) or the apparition of the f π and f Ω ghost distributions. J Phys 43:189

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive approximation on the sphere. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgason S (1984) Groups and geometric analysis. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgason S (1999) The Radon transform. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hielscher R (2007) The inversion of the Radon transform on the rotational group and its application to texture analysis. PhD thesis, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany

  • Hubbard BB (1996) The world according to wavelets. A K Peters, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser G (1994) A friendly guide to wavelets. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T-H (1999) Multiscale representation and analysis of spherical data by spherical wavelets. SIAM J Sci Comput 21(3):924–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies S (1979) On the reproducibility of the orientation distribution function of texture samples from pole figures (ghost phenomena). Phys Status Solidi B 92:K135–K138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhaskar HN, Prestin J (2004) Polynomial frames: a fast tour. In: Proceedings of the international conference of approximation theory, Gatlinburg

  • Muller J, Esling C, Bunge HJ (1981) An inversion formula expressing the texture function in terms of angular distribution function. J Phys 42:161–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolayev DI, Schaeben H (1999) Characteristics of the ultrahyperbolic differential equation governing pole density functions. Inverse Probl 15:1603–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe RJ (1965) Description of crystallite orientation in polycrystal materials III. General solution to pole figure inversion. J Appl Phys 36:2024–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeben H (1997) A simple standard orientation density function: the hyperspherical de la Vallée Poussin kernel. Phys Status Solidi B 200:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder P, Sweldens W (1995) Spherical wavelets: Texture processing. In: Hanrahan P, Purgathofer W (eds) Rendering techniques ’95. Springer, New York, pp 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Boogaart KG (2002) Personal communication

  • Wenk HR (1985) Preferred orientation in deformed metals and rocks: an introduction to modern texture analysis. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Hielscher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hielscher, R., Schaeben, H. Multi-Scale Texture Modeling. Math Geosci 40, 63–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9128-2

Keywords

Navigation