Skip to main content
Log in

Reaching for rigor and relevance: better marketing research for a better world

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past several decades, scholars have highlighted the obligations and opportunities for marketing as a discipline to play a role in creating a better world — or risk becoming irrelevant for the largest problems facing consumers and society. This paper provides a framework to enhance the relevance and rigor of research in marketing that not only contributes new knowledge to science, but also makes a positive difference in the world. To that end, we urge authors and reviewers to foster cross-fertilization from different theoretical and methodological silos, bolster robustness through multiple methods, and expand the domain of research to explore different populations and cultures. In doing so, we hope to encourage further consideration of the role of marketing scholarship in providing a novel lens into potential solutions for societal concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, J., Packard, G., Boghrati, R., Hsu, M., Humphreys, A., Luangrath A., Moore, S., Nave, G., Olivola, C., & Rocklage, M. (2022). Wisdom from words: Marketing insights from text. Marketing Letters, 1–13.

  • Bryan, C. J., & Hershfield, H. E. (2013). You owe it to yourself: Boosting retirement saving with a responsibility-based appeal. Decision, 1, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandon, P., & Cornil, Y. (2022). More value from less food? Effects of epicurean labeling on moderate eating in the United States and in France. Appetite, 178, 106262.

  • Chandy, R. K., Johar, G. V., Moorman, C., & Roberts, J. H. (2021). Better marketing for a better world. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornil, Y., & Chandon, P. (2016). Pleasure as a substitute for size: How multisensory imagery can make people happier with smaller food portions. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornil, Y., Plassmann, H., Aron-Wisnewsky, J., Poitou-Bernert, C., Clément, K., Chabert, M., & Chandon, P. (2022). Obesity and responsiveness to food marketing before and after bariatric surgery. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Gar, D., Levontin, L., & Kogut, T. (2021). The adverse effect of choice in donation decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 570–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbinsky, E. N., Mead, N. L., & Gregg, D. (2021). Popping the positive illusion of financial responsibility can increase personal savings: Applications in emerging and western markets. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K. L., Liu, P. J., McFerran, B., & Chandon, P. (2022). Examining eating: Bridging the gap between “lab eating” and “free-living eating”. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(4).

  • Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. J. (1971). Marketing’s changing social/environmental role. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 1–2.

  • Krishna, A., & Orhun, A. Y. (2022). Gender (still) matters in business school. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(1), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labroo, A. A., & Goldsmith, K. (2021). The dirty underbelly of prosocial behavior: Reconceptualizing greater good as an ecosystem with unintended consequences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. S., & Nestle, M. (2008). Can the food industry play a constructive role in the obesity epidemic? Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(15), 1808–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, D. J., Morwitz, V. G., et al. (2020). Creating boundary-breaking, marketing-relevant consumer research. Journal of Marketing, 84(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G. (2008). The moment and place for a special issue. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 377–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrkva, K., Posner, N. A., Reeck, C., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhun, A. Y., & Palazzolo, M. (2019). Frugality is hard to afford. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, K. M., Staelin, R., & Huber, J. (2008). Using extremeness aversion to fight obesity: Policy implications of context dependent demand. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 406–422.

  • State of Childhood Obesity (2020) Sugary drinks harm kids’ health. https://stateofchildhoodobesity.org/sugary-drinks-harm-kids-health/

  • Thaler, R., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), S164–S187.

  • Viswanathan, M., Umashankar, N., Sreekumar, A., & Goreczny, A. (2021). Marketplace literacy as a pathway to a better world: Evidence from field experiments in low-access subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Vivian Xie, Sonia Kim, Eric Park, and Sherri Xue for their invaluable assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpa Madan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No human subjects were collected, so no ethical approval or informed consent was required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madan, S., Johar, G.V., Berger, J. et al. Reaching for rigor and relevance: better marketing research for a better world. Mark Lett 34, 1–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09648-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09648-1

Keywords

Navigation