Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An empirical examination of consumer co-creation process

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers increasingly collaborate with the company and other consumers across various phases of firm’s new product development (pre-launch activities through ideation, design, and testing) and after-launch marketing process (post-launch activities through promotion, pricing distribution, and maintenance). The purpose of this study is to examine factors influencing consumer participation in firm’s pre- and post-launch co-creation. We propose that company-led efforts through enhanced knowledge sharing with consumers and perceived equity lead to effective dialogical interactions between company and consumers and among consumers, leading to a higher level of consumer participation in both pre- and post-launch co-creation. The proposed model is empirically tested by structural equation modeling using survey data from online video game players, a context rich in consumer co-creation. We find that consumer-to-consumer interaction enhances consumer participation in both pre-launch and post-launch, while business-to-consumer interaction enhances consumer participation only in pre-launch but not in post-launch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following steps were undertaken as robustness checks: (1) correlated the error terms of CP in pre-launch co-creation and CP in post-launch co-creation, (2) used alternative operationalization of CP in co-creation by dropping the 2nd (participation frequency with other consumers), and 3rd (extent of engagement with other consumers) survey items. The results remained qualitatively consistent with our original findings, providing evidence for the robustness of our results.

References

  • Albinsson, P. A., Perera, B. Y., & Sautter, P. T. (2016). DART scale development: Diagnosing a firm’s readiness for strategic value co-creation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugshan, H. (2015). Co-innovation: The role of online communities. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M., S.D.Anthony, and E.A.Roth. 2004. Seeing what’s next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change: Harvard Business Press

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Evans, K. R. (2008). Influence of customer participation on creating and sharing of new product value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(3), 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, T., & Remelhe, P. (2016). How to engage customers in co-creation: Customers’ motivations for collaborative innovation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Matzler, K., & Hoppe, M. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6), 608–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemser, G., & Perks, H. (2015). Co-creation with customers: An evolving innovation research field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 660–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenlein, M., & Libai, B. (2017). Seeding, referral, and recommendation: Creating profitable word-of-mouth programs. California. Management. Review, 59(2), 68–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., Lettl, C., & Keinz, P. (2013). Synergies among producer firms, lead users, and user communities: The case of the LEGO producer–user ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 848–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Chandler, J. D. (2018). How social community and social publishing influence new product launch: The case of Twitter during the PlayStation4 and Xbox one launches. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(1–2), 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Slotegraaf, R. J. (2016). Brand-embedded interaction: A dynamic and personalized interaction for co-creation. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., & Bilro, R. G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. Journal of Business Research, 119, 388–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & E.von Hippel. (2005). User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organization Science., 21(2), 554–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018a). Offerings as digitalized interactive platforms: A conceptual framework and implications. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018b). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions and outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks—By and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. C., Phillips, F., & Yang, C. (2021). Bridging innovation and commercialization to create value: An open innovation study. Journal of Business Research, 123, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. C., & Fang, W. (2010). The effect of consumer-to-consumer interactions on idea generation in virtual brand community relationships. Technovation, 30(11–12), 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyungwon Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This paper received IRB exemption approval from the Rutgers University- The State University of New Jersey. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22.9 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Uslay, C. & Yeniyurt, S. An empirical examination of consumer co-creation process. Mark Lett 34, 205–222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09638-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09638-3

Keywords

Navigation