This research investigates the association between letter case and perception of gender. We propose that referents are judged as more feminine (vs. masculine) when their names are written with lowercase (vs. uppercase) letters. This effect emerges independent of differences in the size in which the letters appear and cannot be fully explained by differences in angularity. We further identify that evaluations of feminine (vs. masculine) objects become more favorable upon presenting their names in lowercase (vs. uppercase) letters. This association between gender and letter case is more pronounced for referents with a clear gender identity (e.g., fragrances and not vacuums). By first identifying and then exploring consequences of the novel link between letter case and gender, the present investigation contributes to research on linguistics, inference, and conceptual associations while also providing insights as to how to construct communication tools most effectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allison, N. K., Golden, L. L., Mullet, G. M., & Coogan, D. (1980). Sex-typed product images: The effects of sex, sex role self-concept and measurement implications. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 604–609.
Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 147–168.
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 61–80). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 464–478.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Debevec, K., & Iyer, E. (1986). The influence of spokespersons in altering a product’s gender image: Implications for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 12–20.
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2004). Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 873–880.
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2006). Dressed for the occasion: Font-product congruity in the perception of logotype. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 112–123.
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2011). Mixed messages in brand names: Separating the impacts of letter shape from sound symbolism. Psychology and Marketing, 28(7), 749–762.
Fairbairn, D. J. (1997). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 659–687.
Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548.
Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 372–386.
Grohmann, B., Giese, J. L., & Parkman, I. D. (2013). Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands. Journal of Brand Management, 20(5), 389–403.
Haber, R. N., & Haber, L. R. (1981). The shape of a word can specify its meaning. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 334–345.
Henderson, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1998). Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 14–30.
Huang, X. I., Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2013). “Seeing” the social roles of brands: How physical positioning influences brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 509–514.
Interbrand best global brand (2018) https://www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2018/ranking. Accessed 3 Aug 2019.
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(1), 57–106.
Klink, R. R. (2009). Gender differences in new brand name response. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 313–326.
Lieven, T., Grohmann, B., Herrmann, A., Landwehr, J. R., & van Tilburg, M. (2014). The effect of brand gender on brand equity. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 371–385.
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017). Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 98–107.
Maglio, S. J., & Feder, M. A. (2017). The making of social experience from the sounds in names. Social Cognition, 35(6), 663–674.
Maglio, S. J., Rabaglia, C. D., Feder, M. A., Krehm, M., & Trope, Y. (2014). Vowel sounds in words affect mental construal and shift preferences for targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1082–1096.
McMurray, G. A. (1958). A study of “fittingness” of signs to words by means of the semantic differential. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 310–312.
Perea, M., Jiménez, M., Talero, F., & López-Cañada, S. (2015). Letter-case information and the identification of brand names. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 162–173.
Polk, T. A., Lacey, H. P., Nelson, J. K., Demiralp, E., Newman, L. I., Krauss, D. A., Raheja, A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). The development of abstract letter representations for reading: Evidence for the role of context. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(1), 70–90.
Rabaglia, C. D., Maglio, S. J., Krehm, M., Seok, J. H., & Trope, Y. (2016). The sound of distance. Cognition, 152, 141–149.
Saad, G. (2013). Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(23), 351–371.
Song, Y., & Luximon, Y. (2019). Design for sustainability: The effect of lettering case on environmental concern from a green advertising perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5), 1333.
Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 37–54.
van der Lans, R., Cote, J. A., Cole, C. A., Leong, S. M., Smidts, A., Henderson, P. W., Bluemelhuber, C., Bottomley, P. A., Doyle, J. R., Fedorikhin, A., Moorthy, J., Ramaseshan, B., & Schmitt, B. H. (2009). Cross-National Logo Evaluation Analysis: An individual-level approach. Marketing Science, 28(5), 968–985.
Wen, N., & Lurie, N. H. (2018). The case for compatibility: Product attitudes and purchase intentions for upper versus lowercase brand names. Journal of Retailing, 94(4), 393–407.
Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257–1267.
Xu, X., Chen, R., & Liu, M. W. (2017). The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions. Marketing Letters, 28(3), 449–460.
Yorkston, E., & De Mello, G. E. (2005). Linguistic gender marking and categorization. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 224–234.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, A., Maglio, S.J. Text is gendered: the role of letter case. Mark Lett 32, 179–190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-021-09556-w
- Letter case
- Conceptual metaphor