Networks are ubiquitous in life, structuring options available for choice and influencing their relative attractiveness. In this article, we propose an integration of network science and choice theory beyond merely incorporating metrics from one area into models of the other. We posit a typology and framework for “network-choice models” that highlight the distinct ways choices occur in and influence networked environments, as well as two specific feedback processes that guide their mutual interaction, emergent valuation and contingent options. In so doing, we discuss examples, data sources, methodological challenges, anticipated benefits, and research pathways to fully interweave network and choice models.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ascarza, E., Ebbes, P., Netzer, O., & Danielson, M. (2017). Beyond the target customer: Social effects of customer relationship management campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 347–363.
Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.
Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.
Braun, M., & Bonfrer, A. (2011). Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using Dirichlet processes. Marketing Science, 30(3), 513–531.
Brock, W. A., & Durlauf, S. N. (2001). Discrete choice with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(2), 235–260.
Bruch, E., & Atwell, J. (2015). Agent-based models in empirical social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(2), 186–221.
Centola, D.(2018). How behavior spreads: the science of complex contagions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chae, I., Stephen, A. T., Bart, Y., & Yao, D. (2017). Spillover effects in seeded word-of-mouth marketing campaigns. Marketing Science, 36(1), 89–104.
Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86.
Durlauf, S. N., & Ioannides, Y. M. (2010). Social interactions. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 451–478.
Fefferman, N.H., Ng, K.L. (2007) The role of individual choice in the evolution of social complexity. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 58–69.
Feit, E. M., Beltramo, M. A., & Feinberg, F. M. (2010). Reality check: combining choice experiments with market data to estimate the importance of product attributes. Management Science, 56(5), 785–800.
Fewell, J. H. (2003). Social insect networks. Science, 301, 1867–1870.
Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Yale, L. J. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 83–100.
Hartmann, W. R., Manchanda, P., Nair, H., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., Hosanagar, K., & Tucker, C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19(3–4), 287–304.
Hauser, J. R., Toubia, O., Evgeniou, T., Befurt, R., & Dzyabura, D. (2010). Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 485–496.
Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55–71.
Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2007). Meeting strangers and friends of friends: how random are social networks? American Economic Review, 97(3), 890–915.
Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., & Wakolbinger, L. M. (2012). Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(2), 183–230.
Lewis, K. (2013). The limits of racial prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(47), 18814–18819.
Louviere, J. J., Meyer, R. J., Bunch, D. S., Carson, R., Dellaert, B., Hanemann, W. M., Hensher, D., & Irwin, J. (1999). Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Marketing Letters, 10(3), 205–217.
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge university press.
Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., Robins, G. (Eds.). (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Maness, M., Cirillo, C., & Dugundji, E. R. (2015). Generalized behavioral framework for choice models of social influence: Behavioral and data concerns in travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 137–150.
Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.
Manski, C.F. (2009). Identification for prediction and decision. Harvard University Press.
Martínez, V., Berzal, F., & Cubero, J. C. (2016). A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 49(4), 1–33.
Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.
Overgoor, J., Benson, A., Ugander, J. (2019). Choosing to grow a graph: modeling network formation as discrete choice. In The World Wide Web Conference (pp. 1409-1420).
Price, D.J.D.S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 510-515.
Rand, W., & Rust, R. T. (2011). Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 181–193.
Seshadri, A., Peysakhovich, A., Ugander, J. (2019). Discovering context effects from raw choice data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03266.
Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 211–239.
Snijders, T. A., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.
Swait, J., Argo, J., & Li, L. (2018). Modeling simultaneous multiple goal pursuit and adaptation in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 352–367.
Wang, J., Aribarg, A., & Atchadé, Y. F. (2013). Modeling choice interdependence in a social network. Marketing Science, 32(6), 977–997.
Webster, C. M., & Morrison, P. D. (2004). Network analysis in marketing. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 12(2), 8–18.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Feinberg, F., Bruch, E., Braun, M. et al. Choices in networks: a research framework. Mark Lett 31, 349–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09541-9
- Choice models
- Decision theory
- Computational social science
- Data science