Platforms create value by enabling interactions between consumers and external producers through infrastructures and rules. We define platform data strategy to encompass all data-related rules undertaken by platforms to foster competitive advantage over the long term. Platform firms face growing pressure to increase accountability for how they use data; yet, an explicit treatment of platforms’ data strategies and a systematic discussion of forces influencing such data-related choices are absent in the academic literature. We articulate how a platform’s data strategy varies based on platform type and business circumstances. Given the interdependencies within a platform’s ecosystem, its data strategy must balance incentives of all stakeholders. Besides discussing these topics, the paper identifies promising research opportunities in platform data strategy to better inform future academic research, strategic decision-making, and regulatory analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Acemoglu, D., Makhdoumi, A., Malekian, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2019). Too much data: prices and inefficiencies in data markets. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature., 54(2), 442–492.
Altman, E. J., & Tripsas, M. (2015). Product to platform transitions: implications of organizational identity. In Shalley, Hitt, & Zhou (Eds.), Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: multilevel linkages. Oxford University Press.
Altman, E. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2017). Platforms, open/user innovation, and ecosystems: a strategic leadership perspective. In Furman, Gawer, Silverman, & Stern (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms (Vol. 37, p. 177, 207). Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd..
Athey, S., Catalini, C., & Tucker, C. (2017). The digital privacy paradox: small money, small costs, small talk. Working Paper.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19–44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bhargava, H. (2020). Cross-producer bundling: an economic model for value aggregation. Management science, forthcoming.
Bhargava, H., & Choudhary, V. (2004). Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 22–36.
Bhargava, H., & Rubel, O. (2019). Sales force compensation design for two-sided market platforms. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 666–678.
Bodoh-Creed, A. L., Boehnke, J., & Hickman, B. R. (2020). How efficient are decentralized auction platforms? Review of economic studies forthcoming.
Bonneau, J., & Preibusch, S. (2010). The privacy jungle: on the market for data protection in social networks. In Moore, Pym, & Ioannidis (Eds.), Economics of information security and privacy. Springer.
Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Hervas-Drane, A. (2020). Strategies for managing the privacy landscape. In Long range planning, . forthcoming.
Claussen, J., Peukert, C., & Sen, A. (2019). The editor vs. the algorithm: targeting, data and externalities in online news. Working Paper.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem! The Case of Enterprise Software. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 263–290.
Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffe, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation and power. Harper Business.
Evans, D. S. (2003). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale J. on Reg, 20(2), 324–381.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 76(5), 940–955.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation”. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2012). Shifts in privacy concerns. American Economic Review, 102(3), 349–353.
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174.
Hagiu, A., Teh, T. H., & Wright, J. (2020). Should Amazon be allowed to sell on its own marketplace? In Working Paper.
Hosanagar, K. (2019). How algorithms are shaping our lives and how we can stay in control: a human’s guide to machine intelligence. New York: Penguin Wiking.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
Krämer, J., Schnurr, D., & Wohlfarth, M. (2019). Trapped in the data-sharing dilemma. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 22–23.
Lin, T. (2020). Valuing intrinsic and instrumental preferences for privacy. SSRN working paper. Working Paper.
Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2016). Self-regulation and competition in privacy policies. The Journal of Legal Studies, 45(S2), S13–S39.
Martin, K. D., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2017). Data privacy: effects on customer and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 36–58.
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal., 38, 141–160.
Miller, A. R., & Tucker, C. (2009). Privacy protection and technology diffusion: the case of electronic medical records. Management Science, 55(7), 1077–1093.
Ohlhausen, M. K., & Okuliar, A. P. (2015). Competition, consumer protection, and the right [approach] to privacy. Antritrust Law Journal, 80(1), 121–156.
Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1449–1592.
Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2018). Innovation, openness and platform control. Management Science, 64(7), 3015–3032.
Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy-and how to make them work for you. W.W. Norton & Company.
Pattabhiramaiah, A., Overby, E., & Xu, L. (2019). Spillovers from online engagement: the effects of digital paywall activation on print subscriber revenue and retention. Working paper.
Porter, M. E. (1989). How competitive forces shape strategy. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in strategic management. London: Palgrave.
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
Romanyuk, G., & Smolin, A. (2019). Cream skimming and information design in matching markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 11(2), 250–276.
Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. (2014). Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: the impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Science, 60(2), 476–493.
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context. AMP, 28, 198–219.
Turjeman, D., & Feinberg, F. M. (2019). When the data are out: measuring behavioral changes following a data breach. Working Paper.
Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Wen, W., & Zhu, F. (2019). Threat of platform-owner entry and complementor responses: evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1336–1367.
We thank the organizers of the 11th Triennial Choice Symposium for a stimulating conference, and the special issue editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhargava, H.K., Rubel, O., Altman, E.J. et al. Platform data strategy. Mark Lett 31, 323–334 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09539-3