Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Speciesism: an obstacle to AI and robot adoption

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Once artificial intelligence (AI) is indistinguishable from human intelligence, and robots are highly similar in appearance and behavior to humans, there should be no reason to treat AI and robots differently from humans. However, even perfect AI and robots may still be subject to a bias (referred to as speciesism in this article), which will disadvantage them and be a barrier to their commercial adoption as chatbots, decision and recommendation systems, and staff in retail and service settings. The author calls for future research that determines causes and psychological consequences of speciesism, assesses the effect of speciesism on the adoption of new products and technologies, and identifies ways to overcome it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Castelo, N. Schmitt, B. and Sarvary, M. (2019). Robot or human? Perceptions of human-like robots. Working Paper.

  • Caviola, L., Everett, J. A. C., & Faber, N. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. D. (2017). From bacteria to Bach and back: the evolution of minds. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2014). Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N. (2018). A mind like mine: the exceptionally ordinary underpinnings of anthropomorphism. Journal of the Association of Consumer Research, 3(4), 591–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logoni, C., Bonezzi A. and Morewedge, C. K. (in print). Reactions to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research

  • Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Noah Castelo for technology comments, Thomas Schmitt for philosophical insight, and Yajin Wang for suggestions on the evolutionary aspects of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Schmitt.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitt, B. Speciesism: an obstacle to AI and robot adoption. Mark Lett 31, 3–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09499-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09499-3

Navigation