The role of scale-induced round numbers and goal specificity on goal accomplishment perceptions

Abstract

Goal progress can be measured using different scales (e.g., lbs., kg, oz., inches lost in weight loss domain). Despite considerable research on perceived goal progress, little is known about the effects of measurement scales on the mental representation of goal attainment. We present three studies across various domains (e.g., monetary earnings, loyalty rewards, games) which demonstrate that, when the goal is not specific, the expression of progress as a round number on a certain scale leads to a higher sense of accomplishment compared with expression of identical progress as a non-round number on a different scale. We further show that this effect is moderated by goal and whether the level of actual progress made is high or low. When the goal is specific, scale-induced round numbers lead to higher perceived accomplishment at lower progress levels, whereas, when the goal is not specific, they lead to higher perceived accomplishment at higher progress levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Allen, E. J., Dechow, P. M., Pope, D. G., & Wu, G. (2016). Reference-dependent preferences: evidence from marathon runners. Management Science, 63(6), 1657–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonezzi, A., Brendl, C. M., & De Angelis, M. (2011). Stuck in the middle: the psychophysics of goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 22(5), 607–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheema, A., & Bagchi, R. (2011). The effect of goal visualization on goal pursuit: implications for consumers and managers. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gunasti, K., & Baskin, E. (2018). Is a $200 Nordstrom gift card worth more or less than a $200 GAP gift card? The asymmetric valuations of luxury gift cards. Journal of Retailing, 94(4), 380–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunasti, K., & Devezer, B. (2016). How competitor brands affect within-brand choice. Marketing Letters, December, 27(4), 715–727.

  7. Gunasti, K., & Ozcan, T. (2016). Consumer reactions to round numbers in brand names. Marketing Letters, 27(2), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunasti, K., & Ross, W. (2010). How and when alpha-numeric nrands affect consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1177–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, S. C., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Motivational consequences of perceived velocity in consumer goal pursuit. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 1045–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, S. C., Zhang, Y., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2012). So near and yet so far: the mental representation of goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hull, C. L. (1932). The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kara, S., Gunasti, K., & Ross, W. (2015). Is it the ‘alpha’ or the ‘numeric’?: consumers’ evaluation of letter versus number changes alphanumeric brand names. Journal of Brand Management, 22(6), 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2012). The small-area hypothesis: effects of progress monitoring on goal adherence. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lynn, M., Flynn, S. M., & Helion, C. (2013). Do consumers prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozcan, T., & Gunasti, K. (2019). How associations between products and numbers in brand names affect consumer attitudes. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pena-Marin, J., & Bhargave, R. (2016). Lasting performance: Round numbers activate associations of stability and increase perceived length of product benefits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 410–416.

  20. Pope, D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). Round numbers as goals: evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab. Psychological Science, 22(1), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott, M., & Nowlis, S. (2013). The effect of goal specificity on consumer goal reengagement. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 444–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Soman, D., & Zhao, M. (2011). The fewer the better: number of goals and savings behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 944–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wallace, S. G., & Etkin, J. (2018). How goal specificity shapes motivation: a reference points perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1033–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wertenbroch, K., Soman, D., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2007). On the perceived value of money: the reference dependence of currency numerosity effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timucin Ozcan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunasti, K., Ozcan, T. The role of scale-induced round numbers and goal specificity on goal accomplishment perceptions. Mark Lett 30, 207–217 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09492-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Goals
  • Progress
  • Goal specificity
  • Round numbers
  • Scales
  • Measurement