Advertisement

Marketing Letters

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 307–318 | Cite as

Protecting positioning innovations: the emergence of non-traditional trademark registrations

  • Saurabh MishraEmail author
  • Demetrios Vakratsas
  • Alexander V. Krasnikov
Article
  • 350 Downloads

Abstract

Firms need to protect their positioning innovations from copycatting and imitation by competition. However, there is limited insight into factors driving legal protection of positioning innovations. This research utilizes non-traditional trademark (NTT) registrations as indicators of protection of certain types of positioning innovations by firms and investigates the role of firm and industry factors in these registrations. Findings based on secondary data collected over the time period (1984–2015) reveal that firm age and market share play a positive role in NTT registrations. Analysis also shows that industry munificence plays a positive role in NTT registrations, whereas competitive intensity and industry dynamism lower NTT registrations. Together, these findings provide important implications for research and practice that extend beyond technological innovations and add to the innovations literature in marketing.

Keywords

Non-traditional trademarks Positioning innovations Probit model Secondary data 

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, S. A. (2001). Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble’s value pricing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 65(January), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(May), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(October), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, R. (1989). The relationship between market characteristics and promotional price elasticities. Marketing Science, 8(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandy, R. K., Prabhu, J. C., & Antia, K. D. (2003). What will the future bring? Dominance, technology expectations, and radical innovation. Journal of Marketing, 67(July), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. (1986). Trademark strategy. Journal of Marketing, 50(January), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conley, J. G. & Szoboscan, J. (2001). Snow White Shows the Way. Managing Intellectual Property Magazine, June.Google Scholar
  10. Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Day, G. S. (1991). Learning about markets. Marketing Science Institute Report #91-117 (June). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Debruyne, M., & Reibstein, D. J. (2005). Competitor see, competitor do: Incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Science, 24(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment and uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gauvin, S., & Sinha, R. K. (1993). Innovativeness in industrial organizations: A two-stage model of adoption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilson, J., & Lalonde, A. G. (2005). Cinnamon buns, marching ducks and cherry-scented racecar exhaust: Protecting nontraditional trademarks. The Trademark Reporter, 95, 773–824.Google Scholar
  18. Golder, P. N. (2000). Historical method in marketing research with new evidence on long-term market share stability. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruca, T. S., & Rego, L. L. (2005). Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 69(July), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauser, J., Tellis, G., & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene, H. W., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horen, F. V., & Pieters, R. (2012). Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hult, G. T. M., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2001). Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krasnikov, A., Mishra, S., & Orozco, D. (2009). Evaluating the financial impact of branding using trademarks: A framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 73(November), 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, R. P., & Grewal, R. (2004), “Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance”. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishra, S., & Slotegraaf, R. J. (2013). Building an innovation base: Exploring the role of acquisition behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(July), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott-Morton, F., & Zettelmeyer, F. (2004). The strategic positioning of store brands in retailer-manufacturer negotiations. Review of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shugan, S. M. (2007). Does good marketing cause bad unemployment? Marketing Science, 26(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2008). Survival of high tech firms: The effects of diversity of product-market portfolios, patents, and trademarks. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(2), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vincent, L. H., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Challagalla, G. N. (2004). Does innovation mediate firm performance? A meta-analysis of determinants and consequences of organizational innovation. Atlanta: Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  36. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(April), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Desautels Faculty of ManagementMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Marketing Department, Quinlan School of BusinessLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations