Skip to main content
Log in

Warmer or cooler: the influence of ambient temperature on complex choices

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temperature affects human cognition, emotion, and behavior in important ways, yet exactly how ambient temperature exerts its influences on complex product choices remains largely unknown. In this research, we examine how relatively warm versus cool temperatures, both within a comfortable range and commonly experienced, can affect people’s decision quality in complex choices. In a series of three experiments, we demonstrate that warm (vs. cool) temperatures prompt affective processing, which then leads to better performance in complex choices. Consumers and companies need to take ambient temperature into account to create optimal environments for complex decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. A. (1989). Temperature and aggression: ubiquitous effects of heat on occurrence of human violence. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnet, T., Pham, M. T., & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Consumers’ trust in feelings as information. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 720–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., & Cameron, M. (1996). The effects of the service environment on affect and consumer perception of waiting time: an integrative review and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 338–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: a review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2012). Influence of warm versus cool temperatures on consumer choice: a resource depletion account. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 984–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T. (2012). http://www.chinanews.com/ga/2012/08-06/4084711.shtml.

  • Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. D. (1982). The effects of cold on the performance of serial choice reaction time and various discrete tasks. Human Factors, 24(5), 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A. (1986). Sustained attention under thermal stress. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31(5), 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A., Ross, J. M., & Szalma, J. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Human Factors, 49(5), 851–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C., Silberstein, R. B., Lau, W. M., Stough, C., & Roberts, W. (2001). Evaluation of cognitive performance in the heat by functional brain imaging and psychometric testing. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 128(4), 719–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrick, R. P., Timmerman, T. A., Carton, A. M., & Abrevaya, J. (2011). Temper, temperature, and temptation: heat-related retaliation in baseball. Psychological Science, 22(4), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Lee, M. P., Bertini, M., Zauberman, G., & Ariely, D. (2015). Money, time, and the stability of consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikels, J. A., Maglio, S. J., Reed, A. E., & Kaplowitz, L. J. (2011). Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotion-focused decision making. Emotion, 11(4), 743–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety & Health Administration Technical Manual (2015). https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_toc.html.

  • Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1118–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. D., Burford, C. L., Beshir, M. Y., & Jensen, R. C. (1983). Effects of workplace thermal conditions on safe work behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 14(3), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, E. (2011). Oh, to be warm in summer’s heat. The New York Times, August 27, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/28/sunday-review/oh-to-be-warm-in-summers-heat.html?_r=0.

  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: the interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwebner, Y., Lee, L., & Goldenberg, J. (2013). The temperature premium: warm temperatures increase product valuation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71302024) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui (Juliet) Zhu.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Stimuli for study 1

Table 1 Lottery information, simple choice task
Table 2 Lottery information, complex choice task

Appendix 2: Stimuli for rather simple lottery choice task

Table 3 Lottery information, rather simple choice task

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, L., Zhu, R.(., Zheng, Y. et al. Warmer or cooler: the influence of ambient temperature on complex choices. Mark Lett 29, 337–350 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9461-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9461-x

Keywords

Navigation