Skip to main content
Log in

Visual attention, buying impulsiveness, and consumer behavior

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buying impulsiveness is frequently triggered by point-of-sale information. In order to impact consumer behavior, this information must be visually noticed. In this study, researchers propose that consumers’ level of buying impulsiveness impacts their visual attention to point-of-sale information (i.e., signs, displays). Specifically, individuals scoring high on the buying impulsiveness scale (BIS) fixate less on point-of-sale information. This was tested in two experiments where participants’ task was to rate their purchase likelihood for ornamental plants. Both experiments demonstrate that consumers with high BIS fixate less on in-store signs but more on displays than low BIS consumers. High BIS participants’ visual attention to informational signs positively impacts their purchasing behavior while their visual attention to the displays does not. Theoretical contributions to consumer behavior literature and implications for retail marketing efforts are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All experimental procedures and processes were approved by the research institution’s IRB.

References

  • Applebaum, W. (1951). Studying consumer behavior in retail stores. Journal of Marketing, 16, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behe, B. K., Fernandez, R. T., Huddleston, P. T., Getter, K. L., Jones, A. M., & Minahan, S. (2013a). Practical field use of eye tracking for consumer research in the retail environment. HortTechnology, 23(4), 517–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe, B. K., Campbell, B. L., Hall, C. R., Khachatryan, H., Dennis, J. H., & Yue, C. (2013b). Consumer preferences for local and sustainable plant production characteristics. Hortscience, 48(2), 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, O. B., Florack, A., Leder, H., Paul, M. A., Serfas, B. G., & Schulz, A. M. (2014). Hard to ignore: impulsive buyers show an attentional bias in shopping situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(3), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clover, V. T. (1950). Relative importance of impulse buying in retail stores. Journal of Marketing, 25(1), 66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., & Eastwood, B. (2005). Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology, 183(3), 350–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenson, R. M. (1984). Longman dictionary of psychology and psychiatry. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, A. (2000). A multi-method investigation of consumer motivations in impulse buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(5), 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubrechts, L. & Koktürk, B. (2012). Effects of visual merchandising on young consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Dissertation, Halmstad University.

  • Kalla, S. M., & Arora, A. P. (2011). Impulse buying: a literature review. Global Business Review, 12(1), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Campbell, B., Yue, C., Hall, C., & Behe, B. (2017). Visual attention to eco-labels predicts consumer preferences for pollinator friendly plants. Sustainability, 9(10), 1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Ahn, J. (2012). Attention to banner ads and their effectiveness: an eye-tracking approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G., & Meng, X. (2008). Consumer knowledge and its consequences: an international comparison. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(3), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogelonsky, M. (1998). Keep candy in the aisles. American Demographics, 20(1), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, A. (2015). Analysing multiple dimensions of impulse buying. MERC Global’s International Journal of Management, 3(3), 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordfält, J., & Lange, F. (2013). In-store demonstrations as a promotion tool. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, M. C., Striano, T., & Oliverio, S. (2014). A picture tells a thousand words: impact of an educational nutrition booklet on nutrition label gazing. Marketing Letters, 25(4), 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: benefits of advertisment originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piron, F. (1991). Defining impulse purchasing. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 509–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G. (2011). Impulse buying and variety seeking: similarities and differences. Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 745–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihn, A., Khachatryan, H., Campbell, B., Hall, C., & Behe, B. (2016). Consumer preferences for organic production methods and origin promotions on ornamental plants: evidence from eye tracking experiments. Agricultural Economics, 47(6), 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rook, D. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostocks, L. (2003). Tapping into the shopper impulse. Canadian Grocer, 117(8).

  • Serfas, B. G., Büttner, O. B., & Florack, A. (2014). Eyes wide shopped: shopping situations trigger arousal in impulsive buyers. PLoS One, 9(12), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, S. W., Wedel, M., & Pieters, F. G. M. (2013). Information acquisition during online decision making: a model-based exploration using eye-tracking data. Management Science, 59(5), 1009–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ståhlberg, M., & Maila, V. (Eds.). (2010). Shopper marketing: how to increase purchase decisions at the point of sale. Philadelphia: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2008). Eye tracking for visual marketing. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 1(4), 231–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, B. (1973). Dictionary of behavioral science. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program of the Florida Department of Agricultural and Consumer Services (Contract Number 020707) and Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program (Contract Number 02085) of the Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayk Khachatryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Behe, B. et al. Visual attention, buying impulsiveness, and consumer behavior. Mark Lett 29, 23–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9446-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-018-9446-9

Keywords

Navigation