Skip to main content
Log in

What else can your payment card do? Multifunctionality of payment modes can reduce payment transparency

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Payment modes (e.g., cash vs. credit card) vary in the transparency of the outflow of money. Smartcards (multifunctional cards), which bundle payment with non-payment functions (e.g., loyalty programs, identification, and other information functions), have become an increasingly popular payment mode. This shift toward multifunctionality in payment modes is assumed to reduce payment transparency and consequently to decrease consumers’ recall accuracy of past expenditures. We employ a field study to examine recall accuracy for recent purchases with cash, a single-function card, and a multifunctional card. We find that recall accuracy is lower when using a single- or a multifunction card than cash. We also find that it is not the multifunctionality of the card that results in a higher recall error but the individual usage patterns: A higher usage frequency of the non-payment functions results in a higher recall error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagchi, R., & Block, L. G. (2011). Chocolate cake please! Why do consumers indulge more when it feels more expensive? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunel, L., Oker, A., Riou, B., & Versace, R. (2010). Memory and consciousness: trace distinctiveness in memory retrievals. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 926–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression / correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosmart. (2016). Facts & figures. http://www.eurosmart.com/facts-figures.html. Accessed 1 August 2017.

  • Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2004). The distinctiveness effect in the absence of conscious recollection: evidence from conceptual priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2006). The distinctiveness effect in explicit and implicit memory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and Memory (pp. 210–234). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Heath, C., & Soll, J. B. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(1), 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. R., & Elliot, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, J. J., Winer, R. S., & Ferraro, R. (2009). The interplay among category characteristics, customer characteristics, and customer activities on in-store decision making. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamleitner, B., & Erki, B. (2012). Payment method and perceptions of ownership. Marketing Letters, 24(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Dunay, P. K., Lyman, B. J., & Kerwin, M. L. E. (2013). Effects of elaboration and relational distinctiveness on sentence memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(3), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: a further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money: the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung, 18(1), 299–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 767–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runnemark, E., Hedman, J., & Xiao, X. (2015). Do consumers pay more using debit cards than cash? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. M., Eisenkraft, N., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2016). “Paper or plastic?”: how we pay influences post-transaction connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 688–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelfer, K. M., & Procaccino, J. D. (2002). Smart card evolution. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: the role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soman, D. (2003). The effect of payment transparency on consumption: quasi-experiments from the field. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, A. B., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The exception is the rule: underestimating and overspending on exceptional expenses. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 800–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Desai, K. K., & Seenivasan, S. (2011). How credit card payments increase unhealthy food purchases: visceral regulation of vices. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (2007). The convergence of mobile data phones, consumer electronics, and wallets: lessons from Japan. Telematics and Informatics, 24(3), 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1982). Consumer response to in-store price information environments. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Blens, Marc Heise, Paula Risius, Leonie Schiedek, and Oliver Zabel for their help with data collection. We also thank Katherine Burson, Scott Rick, and the members of the research seminar in economic and social psychology of the University of Cologne for comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rufina Gafeeva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gafeeva, R., Hoelzl, E. & Roschk, H. What else can your payment card do? Multifunctionality of payment modes can reduce payment transparency. Mark Lett 29, 61–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9445-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9445-2

Keywords

Navigation