Abstract
The current research offers a number of novel findings regarding how individuals respond to Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing, a strategy that affords consumers complete control over prices. Two experiments integrate research on consumer power into the PWYW literature to show that PWYW’s influence arises primarily with respect to low-power consumers who use PWYW’s pricing control to regulate their power states. Specifically, PWYW is shown to promote stronger intentions to purchase and to recommend a product than fixed pricing, particularly for low- versus high-power consumers. Supporting the notion that PWYW offers the powerless a platform for power elevation, experiment 2 reveals that the more favorable responses of low-power consumers to PWYW are accompanied by increased feelings of self-reliance. Further suggesting that low-power consumers value the pricing control afforded by PWYW for power regulation, the effects are not attributed to differences in the amounts that low- and high-power consumers are willing to pay under PWYW. In addition to providing a deeper understanding of PWYW pricing, the present work extends the power literature by demonstrating that power restoration can transpire not only from the possession of certain products but also through the pricing mechanism by which such products are obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
The power manipulations and ad stimuli used in both studies are available from the authors.
Similar WTP amounts were provided by low-power participants in the PWYW (M = 6.38) and PWYW + reference price (M = 6.27; p > .7) conditions as well as by high-power participants in the PWYW (M = 6.64) and PWYW + reference price (M = 6.41, p > .6) conditions.
References
Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. M. (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880.
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173–187.
De Angelis, M. D., Bonezzi, A., Peluso, A. M., Rucker, D. D., & Costabile, M. (2012). On braggarts and gossips: a self-enhancement account of word-of-mouth generation and transmission. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 551–563.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. (2012). Super-size me: product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 1047–1062.
Galinsky, A. G., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466.
Garbinsky, E. N., Klesse, A. K., & Aaker, J. (2014). Money in the bank: feeling powerful increases saving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 610–623.
Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L. D., & Brown, A. (2010). Shared social responsibility: a field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science, 329, 325–327.
Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1042–1048.
Johnson, J. W., & Cui, A. P. (2012). To influence or not to influence: external reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 275–281.
Kim, J., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: a new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44–58.
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1543–1548.
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Desire to acquire: powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257–267.
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, G., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: how power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352–368.
Schindler, R. M. (1998). Consequences of perceiving oneself as responsible for obtaining a discount: evidence for smart-shopper feelings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(4), 371–392.
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(Summer), 199–214.
Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2010). Cultural concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 703–723.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the helpful comments provided by Keith Coulter, Bob Jewell, and Carlos Torelli on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barone, M.J., Bae, T.J., Qian, S. et al. Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing. Mark Lett 28, 437–447 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9425-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9425-6
Keywords
- Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing
- Consumer power
- Value perceptions
- Word-of-mouth (WOM)