Abstract
Market segmentation is widely used by industry to select the most promising target segment. Most organisations are interested in finding one or a small number of target segments to focus on. Yet, traditional criteria used to select a segmentation solution assess the global quality of the segmentation solution. This approach comes at the risk of selecting a segmentation solution with good overall quality criteria which, however, does not contain groups of consumers representing particularly attractive target segments. The approach we propose helps managers to identify segmentation solutions containing attractive individual segments (e.g., more profitable), irrespective of the quality of the global segmentation solution. We demonstrate the functioning of the newly proposed criteria using two empirical data sets. The new criteria prove to be able to identify segmentation solutions containing individual attractive segments which are not detected using traditional quality criteria for the overall segmentation solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, G.H., & Hall, D.J. (1965). ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and pattern classification (Tech. Rep. NTIS No. AD 699616). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
Breckenridge, J.N. (1989). Replicating cluster analysis: method, consistency, and validity. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(2), 147–161.
Breckenridge, J.N. (2000). Validating cluster analysis: consistent replication and symmetry. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(2), 261–285.
Brock, G., Pihur, V., Datta, S., & Datta, S. (2008). Clvalid: an r package for cluster validation. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(4), 1–22.
Calinski, R.B., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3, 1–27.
Chiang, M.M.T., & Mirkin, B. (2010). Intelligent choice of the number of clusters in K-Means clustering: an experimental study with different cluster spreads. Journal of Classification, 27, 3–40.
Dolnicar, S. (2004). Beyond “Commonsense segmentation” – a systematics of segmentation approaches in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3), 244–250.
Dolnicar, S., & Leisch, F. (2010). Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap. Marketing Letters, 21(1), 83–101.
Dudoit, S., & Fridlyand, J. (2002). A prediction-based resampling method to estimate the number of clusters in a data set. Genome Biology, 3(7), 1–21.
Everitt, B.S. (1974). Cluster analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis, 5th edn. Chichester: Wiley.
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A.E. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. The Computer Journal, 41(8), 578–588.
Grün, B., & Leisch, F. (2004). Bootstrapping finite mixture models. In J. Antoch (Ed.) COMPSTAT 2004 (pp. 1115–22). Heidelberg: Physica.
Hartigan, J.A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York, NY: Wiley.
Hennig, C. (2007). Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 258–271.
Iacobucci, D. (2013). Marketing models: multivariate statistics and marketing analytics. Mason, OH: South-Western.
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990). Finding groups in data. New York: Wiley.
Lange, T., Roth, V., Braun, M.L., & Buhman, J.M. (2004). Stability-based validation of clustering solutions. Neural Computation, 16(6), 1299–323.
Leisch, F. (2006). A toolbox for K-Centroids cluster analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51(2), 526–544.
Lilien, G.L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Marketing engineering, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Mazanec, J.A. (2000). Market segmentation. In J. Jafari (Ed.), Encyclopedia of tourism. London: Routledge.
McDonald, M., & Dunbar, I. (2012). Market segmentation: how to do it and how to profit from it, 4th edn. Wiley: Hoboken.
Milligan, G.W., & Cooper, M.C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50(2), 159–79.
Myers, J.H., & Tauber, E. (1977). Market structure analysis. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Papadimitriou, C., & Steiglitz, K. (1982). Combinatorial optimization: algorithms and complexity. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.
Putler, D.S., & Krider, R.E. (2012). Customer and business analytics: applied data mining for business decision making using R. London: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
R Development Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing r foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
Roberts, J. (2000). The intersection of modelling potential and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 127–134.
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Steinley, D. (2008). Stability analysis in K-Means clustering. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 255–273.
Steinley, D., & Brusco, M.J. (2011). Choosing the number of clusters in K-Means clustering. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 285–297.
Tibshirani, R., & Walther, G. (2005). Cluster validation by prediction strength. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 14(3), 511–28.
Vinh, N.X., Epps, J., & Bailey, J. (2010). Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2837–2854.
Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W.A. (2000). Market segmentation conceptual and methodological foundations, 2nd edn. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Australian Research Council for contributing to the funding of this study (ARC, DP110101347). We also thank our research assistants Alexander Chapple and Aaron Eden for their assistance with literature searches. Special thanks to Martin Natter, Bettina Grun, Dominik Ernst, Christina Yassouridis, Homa Hajibaba, and Nazila Babakhani for their feedback on previous versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Technical Appendix
Appendix: Technical Appendix
1.1 Relabelling algorithm required for the calculation of pertinaciousness
For series of partitions we propose a new relabelling algorithm which makes it possible to track segments over partitions with different numbers of clusters. Let again P 1, P 2,…, P m be a series of m partitions with numbers of clusters k 1<k 2<…<k m .
Note that if k i+1 = k i +1, then only one column needs to be inserted in step 4. However, the algorithm also works for the more general case.
1.2 Calculating segment-wise rerun stability
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dolnicar, S., Leisch, F. Using segment level stability to select target segments in data-driven market segmentation studies. Mark Lett 28, 423–436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9423-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9423-8