Marketing Letters

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 337–350 | Cite as

Connecting the dots: how personal need for structure produces false consumer pattern perceptions

Article

Abstract

The human tendency to recognize patterns even when none exist is shown to have applications in consumer behavior. The current research demonstrates that as one’s personal need for structure (PNS) increases (i.e., requiring predictability and disfavoring uncertainty), false consumer pattern perceptions emerge. Construal level moderates this relationship such that as abstract mindsets (high construal) seek out underlying explanations and enhance, concrete mindsets (low construal) evaluate consumer-related stimuli in terms of its contextual elements and therefore attenuate the effect. Types of consumer patterns are characterized by false expectations about the performance of a cellular phone (study 1), the association of human characteristics toward personal computers (study 2), and the development of beliefs in corporate conspiracy theories (study 3). This research has implications for practitioners and academics as it expands on the literature related to false pattern perceptions by investigating it through the lens of consumer decision-making.

Keywords

False pattern perceptions Personal need for structure Construal level Product anthropomorphism Corporate conspiracy theory 

References

  1. Aviv, R. (2014). A valuable reputation. New York: The New Yorker.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freitas, A. L., Clark, S. L., Kim, J. Y., & Levy, S. R. (2009). Action-construal levels and perceived conflict among ongoing goals: implications for positive affect. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 938–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita, K., & Han, H. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses the effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20(7), 799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014). A functional basis for structure-seeking: exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(2), 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim, H., & John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(2), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nenkov, G. Y. (2012). It’s all in the mindset: effects of varying psychological distance in persuasive messages. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sagan, C. (1995). Science as a candle in the dark. The demon-haunted world. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Shermer, M. (2011). The believing brain: from ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J. H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright, S., Manolis, C., Brown, D., Guo, X., Dinsmore, J., Chiu, C. Y. P., & Kardes, F. R. (2012). Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zusne, L., & Jones, W. H. (2014). Anomalistic psychology: a study of magical thinking. Hillsdale: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing, John Molson School of BusinessConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations