This article proposes that construal level moderates consumer evaluation of different appeals (emotional vs. cognitive appeals) in advertisements. Low-level construal is associated with close psychological distance; this condition implies that people with low-level construal can feel an emotion more intensely than those with high-level construal. Consequently, consumers with low-level construal could positively relate with the emotional appeal ad, and they would evaluate an ad with emotional appeal more favorably than an ad with cognitive appeal. However, this effect does not occur among consumers who construe information at high-level, due to the fact that they are able to focus on the central and positive features of different appeals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Zemla, J. C. (2010). Missing the trees for the forest: a construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 436–451.
Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2011). Cognitive and affective matching effects in persuasion: an amplification perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1415–1427.
DeBono, K. G. (2006). Self‐monitoring and consumer psychology. Journal of Personality, 74(3), 715–738.
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781–795.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 363–381.
Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 579–599.
Fox, S. R. (1997). The mirror makers: a history of American advertising and its creators. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739–752.
Frijda, N. H. (1992). The empirical status of the laws of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 467–477.
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367.
Han D., Duhachek A., & Agrawal N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), Forthcoming
Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). When time flies: how abstract and concrete mental construal affect the perception of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 336–347.
Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 483–488.
Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23–33.
Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: how global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203–216.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007a). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 353–381). New York: Guilford.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007b). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117.
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.
Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 565–586). New York: Guilford.
Mayer, N. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2010). “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 443–454.
McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1308–1314.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19.
Park, K., & Kim, Y. (2012). I will like it later but not now: the roles of temporal distance and guilt in hedonic product evaluation. Seoul Journal of Business, 18(1), 105–123.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. The Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145.
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Duke, S. C. (2011). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 182–189.
See, Y. H. M., Petty, R. E., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 938–955.
Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 124–148.
Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 586–597.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.
Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 807–821.
Tsai, C. I., & Thomas, M. (2011). When does feeling of fluency matter? How abstract and concrete thinking influence fluency effects. Psychological Science, 22(3), 348–354.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.
Van Boven, L., & Ashworth, L. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 289–300.
Van Boven, L., Kane, J., McGraw, A. P., & Dale, J. (2010). Feeling close: emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 872–885.
Wakslak, C. J., & Trope, Y. (2009). Cognitive consequences of affirming the self: the relationship between self-affirmation and object construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 927–932.
Wright, S., Manolis, C., Brown, D., Guo, X., Dinsmore, J., Chiu, C.-Y. P., & Kardes, F. R. (2012). Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 253–261.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Ansley Burns and Charmant Sengabira Ndereyimana for the participation of their students in this research. The authors are also thankful to Joshua Littleton and Lilian Florian for their assistance to proofread this article. Finally, the authors acknowledge the constructive feedback from the editor and two anonymous reviewers.
About this article
Cite this article
Septianto, F., Pratiwi, L. The moderating role of construal level on the evaluation of emotional appeal vs. cognitive appeal advertisements. Mark Lett 27, 171–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9324-z
- Construal level
- Emotional appeal
- Cognitive appeal