Marketing Letters

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 549–563 | Cite as

Sounds good: Phonetic sound patterns in top brand names

  • Ruth Pogacar
  • Emily Plant
  • Laura Felton Rosulek
  • Michal Kouril
Article

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that brand name sounds can influence consumer behavior. Sound symbolism, the link between sound and meaning, can convey product information, enhance affinity, and increase purchase intentions. This study examines sound patterns of Interbrand top 100 brand names, including three previously unexamined sound categories. Results show that top brand names have different sound patterns than general brand names. The pattern of differences suggests that sound symbolism may be one factor contributing to brand performance. Sounds more frequent among top brand names have potentially brand enhancing properties, while sounds less frequent may have the opposite effect. These findings should inform best naming practices and strategies.

Keywords

Brand names Sound symbolism Linguistics Brand performance Phonetics 

References

  1. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations and brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, C. T., Fournier, S., & Miller, F. (2008). Brands and their meaning makers. In C. Haugtvedt, P. Herr, & F. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 781–822). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  3. Argo, J., Popa, M., & Smith, M. C. (2010). The sound of brands. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolinger, D. L. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word, 6, 117–136.Google Scholar
  5. Cortese, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 3(9), 652–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Small sounds, big deals: phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
  8. Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word corpus of contemporary American English (19902008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Klerk, V., & Bosch, B. (1997). The sound patterns of English nicknames. Language Sciences, 19(4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52–64.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erlich, J. (1995). Giving drugs a good name, The New York Times Magazine, September 3, 36–37.Google Scholar
  12. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2010). An introduction to language (9th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. Hartley, R. F. (1992). Marketing mistakes (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Heath, D. & Heath, C. (2011). How to pick the perfect brand name, Fast Company, January 3.Google Scholar
  15. Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, G. (2008). New car names - how they get 'em, CNN, March 7.Google Scholar
  17. Interbrand (2011). Methodology. Accessed 20 Oct 2011. http://www.interbrand.com. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
  18. Jenkins, J. J., Russell, W. A., & Suci, G. J. (1958). An atlas of semantic profiles for 360 words. The American Journal of Psychology, 71(4), 688–699.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, R. C., Suzuki, N. S., & Olds, W. K. (1964). Phonetic symbolism in an artificial language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: the use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klink, R. R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: a study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 27–34.Google Scholar
  23. Klink, R. R. (2003). Creating meaningful brands: the relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klink, R. R. (2009). Gender differences in new brand name response. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 313–326.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Klink, R. R. & Wu, L. (2013). The role of position, type and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Marketing Letters.Google Scholar
  26. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, P. (ed.). (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
  28. Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 406–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowrey, T. M., Shrum, L. J., & Dubitsky, T. M. (2003). The relation between brand-name linguistic characteristics and brand-name memory. Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Plato. (1985). In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues of plato including the letters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schloss, I. (1981). Chickens and pickles. Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 47–49.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, G. W. (1998). The political impact of name sounds. Communication Monographs, 65(2), 154–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. U.S. Patent and Trademark website accessed 4/19/2012. http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/trademarks/main.dashxml. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
  35. Vanden Bergh, B. (1990). The rekurring kase of the special K. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(5), RC9–RC12.Google Scholar
  36. Vanden Bergh, B., Adler, K., & Oliver, L. (1987). Linguistic distinction among top brand names. Journal of Advertising Research, 27(4), 39–44.Google Scholar
  37. Yorkston, E., & Menon, G. (2004). A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Pogacar
    • 1
  • Emily Plant
    • 2
  • Laura Felton Rosulek
    • 3
  • Michal Kouril
    • 4
  1. 1.Lindner College of BusinessUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management and MarketingUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  3. 3.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical InformaticsCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center/University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations