Skip to main content
Log in

Falling in love with brands: a dynamic analysis of the trajectories of brand love

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a study designed to investigate and map the trajectories of brand love. Consumers described experiences related to the initiation and evolution of their relationships with their most loved brand. Participants were asked to graphically trace the course of their feelings toward their currently most loved brand and to recall the events that influenced those feelings. The paths toward brand love followed five distinct trajectories, labeled as “slow development,” “liking becomes love,” “love all the way,” “bumpy road,” and “turnabout.” The formative experiences shaping these trajectories often include individual, personal, and private experiences that are largely outside any marketer’s control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuvia, A. C. (1993). I love it! Towards a unifying theory of love across diverse love objects. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Marketing, Northwestern University, Evanston.

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1985). Attachments across the life span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61(9), 792–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2008). When consumers love their brands: Exploring the concept and its dimensions. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1062–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alea, N., & Bluck, S. (2007). I’ll keep you in mind: The intimacy function of autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(8), 1091–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alea, N., & Vick, S. C. (2010). The first sight of love: Relationship-defining memories and marital satisfaction across adulthood. Memory, 18(7), 730–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M., & Bettman, J. R. (1992). Autobiographical memories, affect, and consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 53–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2010). Two studies of consequences and actionable antecedents of brand love. Journal of Brand Management, 17(7), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T., & Rubin, D. C. (2005). A TALE of three functions: The self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23(1), 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgements: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13–37). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1960). Separation anxiety: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1(4), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-LaTour, K. A., LaTour, M. S., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2007). Using childhood memories to gain insight into brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-C., & Chan, C.-N. (2007). Perceptions of commitment change during mate selection: The case of Taiwanese newlyweds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A., Chakravarti, D., & Biehal, G. (1990). Memory-based inferences during choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., Surra, C. A., Fitzgerald, N. M., & Cate, R. M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships. Vol. 2: Developing personal relationships (pp. 53–88). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1971). The collected works of C. G. Jung, volume 6: Psychological types. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, S., Kleine, R. E., & Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a possession “me” or “not me”? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lastovicka, J. L., & Sirianni, N. J. (2011). Truly, madly, deeply: Consumers in the throes of material possession love. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. E., & Lott, A. J. (1960). The formation of positive attitudes toward group members. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(2), 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riela, S., Rodriguez, G., Aron, A., Xu, X., & Acevedo, B. P. (2010). Experiences of falling in love: Investigating culture, ethnicity, gender, and speed. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R. (2011). Measurement for the social sciences: The C-OAR-SE method and why it must replace psychometrics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R. (2012). A new C-OAR-SE-based content-valid and predictively valid measure that distinguishes brand love from brand liking. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 905–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R., & Bellman, S. (2012). Emotional branding pays off: How brands meet share of requirements through bonding, companionship, and love. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(3), 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T. A., & Madden, T. J. (1988). Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg’s triangular theory of love. In M. J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 15, pp. 163–168). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, M., Bettman, J. R., & Baumgartner, H. (1993). Influencing consumer judgments using autobiographical memories: A self-referencing perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surra, C. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surra, C. A. (1987). Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship type. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(1), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. (1971). Passionate love. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.), Theories of attraction and love (pp. 85–99). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang, Y.-O., Allen, J. A., Sahoury, N., & Zhang, H. (2004). Falling in love with a product: The structure of a romantic consumer-product relationship. In B. E. Kahn & M. F. Luce (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 31, pp. 320–327). Valdosta: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Langner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langner, T., Bruns, D., Fischer, A. et al. Falling in love with brands: a dynamic analysis of the trajectories of brand love. Mark Lett 27, 15–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9283-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9283-4

Keywords

Navigation