Abstract
The current research introduces a new moderator to the price comparison literature by considering how the processing of regular and sale price information may be grounded in the degree to which consumers are consistent-handed (CHs) or inconsistent-handed (ICHs) in performing manual tasks. Because vertically presenting regular and sale price information facilitates calculation of savings, vertical price comparisons should be processed more fluently than horizontal comparisons. However, this fluency difference should asymmetrically affect ICHs and CHs. Prior research has indicated that ICHs are more cognitively flexible than CHs. Here, ICHs expressed more favorable purchase intentions with greater deal depth for both vertical and horizontal price comparisons, possibly because their greater cognitive flexibility enabled them to process price comparisons effectively regardless of presentation layout. Conversely, possibly due to lower cognitive flexibility, CHs exhibited purchase intentions that were sensitive to differences in deal depth when presented with more fluent vertical price comparisons, but not less fluent horizontal comparisons. These findings are replicated across two experiments relying on different participant populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303–321.
Arning, L., Ocklenburg, S., Schulz, S., Ness, V., Gerding, W. M., Hengstler, J. G., et al. (2013). PCSK6 VNTR polymorphism is associated with degree of handedness but not direction of handedness. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067251.
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 138(3), 351–367.
Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is ‘right’: motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22(4), 419–422.
Chandrashekaran, R. (2004). The influence of redundant comparison prices and other price presentation formats on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 80, 53–66.
Chang, C. (2013). Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price. Marketing Letters. doi:10.1007/s11002-013-9223-8.
Choi, P., & Coulter, K. S. (2012). It's not all relative: the effects of mental and physical positioning of comparative prices on absolute versus relative discount assessment. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 512–527.
Christman, S. D. (2013). Individual differences in personality as a function of degree of handedness: Consistent-handers are less sensation seeking, more authoritarian, and more sensitive to disgust. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, In press.
Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 313–319.
Christman, S. D., Henning, B. R., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, 13, 403–426.
Christman, S. D., Sontam, V., & Jasper, J. D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous figure perception: degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38, 1183–1198.
Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coulter, K. S., & Norberg, P. A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 144–157.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.
Dragovic, M. (2004). Categorization and validation of handedness using latent class analysis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 16, 212–218.
Edlin, J. M., & Lyle, K. B. (2013). The effect of repetitive saccade execution on the attention network test: enhancing executive function with a flick of the eyes. Brain and Cognition, 81, 345–351.
Elder, R., & Krishna, A. (2012). The ‘visual depiction effect’ in advertising: facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.
Jasper, J. D., Barry, K., & Christman, S. D. (2008). Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 488–492.
Kim, J., Allen, C. T., & Kardes, F. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(August), 318–326.
Krishna, A. (2009). Behavioral pricing. In V. R. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 76–90). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 101–118.
Lyle, K. B., & Grillo, M. C. (2013). Consistent-handed individuals are more authoritarian. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition. In press.
Lyle, K. B., & Martin, J. M. (2010). Bilateral saccades increase intrahemispheric processing but not interhemispheric interaction: implications for saccade-induced retrieval enhancement. Brain and Cognition, 73, 128–134.
Lyle, K. B., Logan, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008a). Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 515–520.
Lyle, K. B., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008b). Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tests. Neuropsychology, 22, 523–530.
Lyle, K. B., Hanaver-Torrez, S. D., Hackländer, R. P., & Edlin, J. M. (2012). Consistency of handedness, regardless of direction, predicts baseline memory accuracy and potential for memory enhancement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 187–193.
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 1–12.
Oppenheimer, D., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(9).
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338–342.
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shobe, E. R., Ross, N. M., & Fleck, J. I. (2009). Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition, 71, 204–214.
Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2009). Hueristics in numerical cognition: implications for pricing. In V. R. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 132–149). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 807–821.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barone, M.J., Lyle, K.B. & Winterich, K.P. When deal depth doesn't matter: How handedness consistency influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparisons. Mark Lett 26, 213–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9276-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9276-8