Skip to main content
Log in

When deal depth doesn't matter: How handedness consistency influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparisons

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research introduces a new moderator to the price comparison literature by considering how the processing of regular and sale price information may be grounded in the degree to which consumers are consistent-handed (CHs) or inconsistent-handed (ICHs) in performing manual tasks. Because vertically presenting regular and sale price information facilitates calculation of savings, vertical price comparisons should be processed more fluently than horizontal comparisons. However, this fluency difference should asymmetrically affect ICHs and CHs. Prior research has indicated that ICHs are more cognitively flexible than CHs. Here, ICHs expressed more favorable purchase intentions with greater deal depth for both vertical and horizontal price comparisons, possibly because their greater cognitive flexibility enabled them to process price comparisons effectively regardless of presentation layout. Conversely, possibly due to lower cognitive flexibility, CHs exhibited purchase intentions that were sensitive to differences in deal depth when presented with more fluent vertical price comparisons, but not less fluent horizontal comparisons. These findings are replicated across two experiments relying on different participant populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arning, L., Ocklenburg, S., Schulz, S., Ness, V., Gerding, W. M., Hengstler, J. G., et al. (2013). PCSK6 VNTR polymorphism is associated with degree of handedness but not direction of handedness. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 138(3), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is ‘right’: motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22(4), 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekaran, R. (2004). The influence of redundant comparison prices and other price presentation formats on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 80, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (2013). Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price. Marketing Letters. doi:10.1007/s11002-013-9223-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, P., & Coulter, K. S. (2012). It's not all relative: the effects of mental and physical positioning of comparative prices on absolute versus relative discount assessment. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 512–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. D. (2013). Individual differences in personality as a function of degree of handedness: Consistent-handers are less sensation seeking, more authoritarian, and more sensitive to disgust. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, In press.

  • Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. D., Henning, B. R., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, 13, 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. D., Sontam, V., & Jasper, J. D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous figure perception: degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38, 1183–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S., & Norberg, P. A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragovic, M. (2004). Categorization and validation of handedness using latent class analysis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 16, 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlin, J. M., & Lyle, K. B. (2013). The effect of repetitive saccade execution on the attention network test: enhancing executive function with a flick of the eyes. Brain and Cognition, 81, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R., & Krishna, A. (2012). The ‘visual depiction effect’ in advertising: facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. D., Barry, K., & Christman, S. D. (2008). Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 488–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Allen, C. T., & Kardes, F. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(August), 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2009). Behavioral pricing. In V. R. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 76–90). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, K. B., & Grillo, M. C. (2013). Consistent-handed individuals are more authoritarian. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition. In press.

  • Lyle, K. B., & Martin, J. M. (2010). Bilateral saccades increase intrahemispheric processing but not interhemispheric interaction: implications for saccade-induced retrieval enhancement. Brain and Cognition, 73, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, K. B., Logan, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008a). Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 515–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, K. B., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008b). Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tests. Neuropsychology, 22, 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, K. B., Hanaver-Torrez, S. D., Hackländer, R. P., & Edlin, J. M. (2012). Consistency of handedness, regardless of direction, predicts baseline memory accuracy and potential for memory enhancement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(9).

  • Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shobe, E. R., Ross, N. M., & Fleck, J. I. (2009). Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition, 71, 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2009). Hueristics in numerical cognition: implications for pricing. In V. R. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 132–149). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 807–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Barone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barone, M.J., Lyle, K.B. & Winterich, K.P. When deal depth doesn't matter: How handedness consistency influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparisons. Mark Lett 26, 213–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9276-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9276-8

Keywords

Navigation