Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Customization of online advertising: The role of intrusiveness

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the trade-off between tailoring an ad to an individual consumer’s needs and the demand for personal data required to do so, which is inherent in targeted online advertising. Two scenario-based studies in two different industries reveal the extent to which using personal information with greater distinctiveness affects consumers’ sense of intrusiveness and purchase intentions. We also manipulate ad fit to each consumer’s needs and the presence of a discount to investigate whether feelings of intrusiveness mitigate the potential positive effects of fit and discount. Higher degrees of personalization, such as adding personal identification or transaction information to browsing data, increase feelings of intrusiveness, and negatively affect purchase intentions. These negative effects are not compensated for by offering discounts but can be partly mitigated by presenting an ad with a high fit to consumers’ current needs. The positive effect of tailoring the ad is weakened at higher levels of intrusiveness though. Furthermore, high fit may lead to not only higher purchase intentions but also higher perceived intrusiveness levels. Presenting a consumer with a customized ad can thus be a double-edged sword, leading to higher purchase intentions but also greater perceived intrusiveness, which then negatively affects purchase intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bijmolt, T. H. A., van Heerde, H. J., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2005). New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boris, C. (2012). Online ad spending to top print in 2012. Marketing Pilgrim, January 19. Available at http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2012/01/online-ad-spending-to-top-print-in-2012.html. Accessed 18 September 2012.

  • Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2–3), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, L. D., & Grewal, D. (1998). Comparative price advertising: an integrative review. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. J. (1993). How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: when unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23(1), 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Steger, C. J. (2009). Testing the value of customization: when do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2011). Online display advertising: targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science, 30(3), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helft, M., & Vega, T. (2010). Retargeting ads follow surfers to other sites. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/30/technology/30adstalk.html. Accessed 29 August 2010

  • Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2009). Intrusiveness in romantic relationships: a cross-cultural perspective on imbalances between proximity and autonomy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(6–7), 989–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Edwards, S. M., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian, T. A. (1996). Personality and ad-evoked feelings: the case for extraversion and neuroticism. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto, M., & Chang, S. (2006). Consumers' attitudes toward unsolicited commercial e-mail and postal direct mail marketing methods: intrusiveness, perceived loss of control, and irritation. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki, S., Li, H., & Hirose, M. (2009). Consumer privacy concerns and preference for degree of regulatory control. Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, E. (2011). Using credit cards to target web ads. The Wall Street Journal, October 25. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204002304576627030651339352.html. Accessed September 18, 2012.

  • Tam, K. Y., & Ho, S. Y. (2006). Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 865–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thota, S. C., & Biswas, A. (2009). I want to buy the advertised product only! Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. (2011). Social networks, personalized advertising and privacy controls. Working Paper 4851-10, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.

  • White, T. B., Zahay, D. L., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Shavitt, S. (2008). Getting too personal: reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters, 19(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying, L., Korneliussen, T., & Grønhaug, K. (2009). The effect of ad value, ad placement and ad execution on the perceived intrusiveness of web advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 623–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Marketing, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700, AV, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Jenny van Doorn & Janny C. Hoekstra

Authors
  1. Jenny van Doorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janny C. Hoekstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janny C. Hoekstra.

Additional information

The authors thank VODW, Leusden, and the Customer Insights Center, Groningen, both in The Netherlands, for supporting this research project. They also gratefully acknowledge the three anonymous ML reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments.

Appendix: Examples of stimuli used in the studies

Appendix: Examples of stimuli used in the studies

Study 1: Offer with high fit using the person’s name

figure a

Study 2: Offer with low fit and discount, using transaction information

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Doorn, J., Hoekstra, J.C. Customization of online advertising: The role of intrusiveness. Mark Lett 24, 339–351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9222-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9222-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation