RETRACTED ARTICLE: Why money meanings matter in decisions to donate time and money

This article was retracted on 05 March 2016

Abstract

Most charitable organizations cannot accomplish their missions without asking for money. This is paradoxical because recent research suggests that mentioning money primes a self-sufficient mindset, thus undermining the very behaviors these organizations desire to elicit. We offer an important qualification to this problematic effect. We find that priming cash concepts reduces willingness to help others, while activating credit card concepts reverses these effects. To explain our findings, in three studies we show that priming cash concepts makes costs associated with donating time or money more salient in the decision context, thereby reducing willingness to give help and to receive it. However, priming credit card concepts makes the benefits of donation more salient.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aunel, R. K., & Basil, M. D. (1994). A relational obligations approach to the foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 546–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belk, R. W., & Wallendorf, M. (1990). The sacred meanings of money. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, P. N., & Novelli, W. D. (1981). Problems and challenges in social marketing. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Briers, B., Pandelaere, M., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2006). Hungry for money. Psychological Science, 17(11), 939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee, P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). Do payment mechanisms change the way consumers perceive products? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cialdini, R. B., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg, R. A. (1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendoza, N. A., & Pracejus, J. W. (1997). Buy now, pay later: Does a future temporal orientation affect credit overuse? Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 499–503.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McSweeney, F. K., & Bierley, C. (1984). Recent developments in classical conditioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 619–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling procedures for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reingen, P. H. (1978). On inducing compliance with requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimp, T. A., & Moody, M. (2000). In search of a theoretical explanation for the credit card effect. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal Risk Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, M., Desai, K., & Seenivasan, S. (2011). How credit card payments increase unhealthy food purchases: Visceral regulation of vices. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions Psychology Science, 17(3), 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weyant, J. M., & Smith, S. L. (1987). Getting more by asking for less: The effects of request size on donations of charity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zelizer, V. A. R. (1997). The social meaning of money: Pin money, paychecks, poor relief, and other currencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money. Psychology Science, 20(6), 700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayati Sinha.

Additional information

All authors contributed equally and their names are mentioned in an alphabetical order. The authors thank Himanshu Mishra for his helpful comments on previous version of this paper.

This article has been retracted at the suggestion of journal Editors-in-Chief, Peter N. Golder and Joel H. Steckel. The article’s authors unanimously requested retraction of Study 3 based on unexplained anomalies in the data and coding errors. As a result, the editors deem it appropriate to retract the entire article.

An erratum to this article can be found online athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9401-6.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9401-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatterjee, P., Rose, R.L. & Sinha, J. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Why money meanings matter in decisions to donate time and money. Mark Lett 24, 109–118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9215-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Money
  • Priming
  • Charity
  • Donation
  • Helping
  • Credit