Marketing Letters

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 109–118 | Cite as

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Why money meanings matter in decisions to donate time and money

  • Promothesh Chatterjee
  • Randall L. Rose
  • Jayati Sinha
Article

Abstract

Most charitable organizations cannot accomplish their missions without asking for money. This is paradoxical because recent research suggests that mentioning money primes a self-sufficient mindset, thus undermining the very behaviors these organizations desire to elicit. We offer an important qualification to this problematic effect. We find that priming cash concepts reduces willingness to help others, while activating credit card concepts reverses these effects. To explain our findings, in three studies we show that priming cash concepts makes costs associated with donating time or money more salient in the decision context, thereby reducing willingness to give help and to receive it. However, priming credit card concepts makes the benefits of donation more salient.

Keywords

Money Priming Charity Donation Helping Credit 

References

  1. Aunel, R. K., & Basil, M. D. (1994). A relational obligations approach to the foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 546–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Belk, R. W., & Wallendorf, M. (1990). The sacred meanings of money. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, P. N., & Novelli, W. D. (1981). Problems and challenges in social marketing. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briers, B., Pandelaere, M., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2006). Hungry for money. Psychological Science, 17(11), 939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). Do payment mechanisms change the way consumers perceive products? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cialdini, R. B., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feinberg, R. A. (1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mendoza, N. A., & Pracejus, J. W. (1997). Buy now, pay later: Does a future temporal orientation affect credit overuse? Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 499–503.Google Scholar
  12. McSweeney, F. K., & Bierley, C. (1984). Recent developments in classical conditioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling procedures for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reingen, P. H. (1978). On inducing compliance with requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shimp, T. A., & Moody, M. (2000). In search of a theoretical explanation for the credit card effect. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal Risk Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas, M., Desai, K., & Seenivasan, S. (2011). How credit card payments increase unhealthy food purchases: Visceral regulation of vices. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions Psychology Science, 17(3), 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weyant, J. M., & Smith, S. L. (1987). Getting more by asking for less: The effects of request size on donations of charity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zelizer, V. A. R. (1997). The social meaning of money: Pin money, paychecks, poor relief, and other currencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money. Psychology Science, 20(6), 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Promothesh Chatterjee
    • 1
  • Randall L. Rose
    • 2
  • Jayati Sinha
    • 3
  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Darla Moore School of BusinessUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Eller College of ManagementUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations