The way a choice is presented influences what a decision-maker chooses. This paper outlines the tools available to choice architects, that is anyone who present people with choices. We divide these tools into two categories: those used in structuring the choice task and those used in describing the choice options. Tools for structuring the choice task address the idea of what to present to decision-makers, and tools for describing the choice options address the idea of how to present it. We discuss implementation issues in using choice architecture tools, including individual differences and errors in evaluation of choice outcomes. Finally, this paper presents a few applications that illustrate the positive effect choice architecture can have on real-world decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bardolet, D., Fox, C. R., & Lovallo, D. (2009). Naïve diversification and partition dependence in capital allocation decisions: field and experimental evidence. Strategic Management Journal (in press).
Benartzi, R., & Thaler, R. (2001). Naïve diversification strategies in retirement saving plans. American Economic Review, 91, 475–482.
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (2004). Save more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee savings. Journal of Political Economy, 112, S164–S187.
Bodapati, A. V. (2008). Recommendation systems with purchase data. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 77–93.
Bond, S. D., Carlson, K. A., & Keeney, R. L. (2008). Generating objectives: can decision makers articulate what they want? Management Science, 54, 56–70.
Börsch-Supan, A. (2003). Life-cycle savings and public policy: a cross-national study of six countries. New York: Academic.
Brown, J. R. (2007). Rational and behavioral perspectives on the role of annuities in retirement planning. (NBER Working Paper No. 13537). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Cambridge, MA.
Brown, C. L., & Krishna, A. (2004). The skeptical shopper: a metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 529–539.
Burson, K. A., Larrick, R. P., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (2009). Six of one, half dozen of the other: expanding and contracting numerical dimensions produces preference reversals. Psychological Science, 20, 1074–1078.
Cook, D. J., & Song, W. Z. (2009). Ambient intelligence and wearable computing: sensors on the body, in the home, and beyond. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 1, 83–86.
Cooke, A. D. J., Sujan, H., Sujan, M., & Weitz, B. A. (2002). Marketing the unfamiliar: the role of context and item-specific information in electronic agent recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 488–497.
Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2010). Energy conservation nudges and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Cambridge, MA. (NBER Working Paper No. 15939).
Cronqvist, H., & Thaler, R. (2004). Design choices in privatized social security systems: learning from the Swedish experience. American Economic Review, 94, 424–428.
Davidoff, T., Brown, J. R., & Diamond, P. A. (2005). Annuities and individual welfare. American Economic Review, 95, 1573–1590.
Dellaert, B. G. C., & Häubl, G. (2012). Searching in choice mode: consumer decision processes in product search with recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research. doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0481.
Diehl, K., Kornish, L. J., & Lynch, J. G. (2003). Smart agents: when lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 56–71.
Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Liu, K. (2011). Partitioning default effects: why people choose not to choose. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17, 332–341.
Fox, C. R., & Clemen, R. T. (2005). Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Science, 51, 1417–1432.
Fox, C. R., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2003). Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 14, 195–200.
Fox, C. R., Bardolet, D., & Lieb, D. (2005). Partition dependence in decision analysis, resource allocation, and consumer choice. In: R. Zwick, & A. Rapoport (Ed.). Experimental business research, volume III. Springer, Dordrecht, 3:229–251.
Fox, C. R., Ratner, R. K., & Lieb, D. (2005). How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134, 538–551.
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 875, 617–638.
Goldstein, D. G., Johnson, E. J., Herrman, A., & Heitmann, M. (2008). Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harvard Business Review, 86, 99–105.
Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2012). Trigger foods alter vegetable and fruit selection in school lunchrooms. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 41, 114–123.
Hansen, J. (2009). Storms of my grandchildren: the truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to save humanity. New York: Bloomsbury.
Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86–92.
Häubl, G., & Murray, K. B. (2003). Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: the role of electronic recommendation agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 75–91.
Häubl, G., & Murray, K. B. (2006). Double agents: assessing the role of electronic product recommendation systems. Sloan Management Review, 47, 8–12.
Häubl, G., & Trifts, V. (2000). Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19, 4–21.
Häubl, G., Dellaert, B. G. C., & Donkers, B. (2010). Tunnel vision: local behavioral influences on consumer decisions in product search. Marketing Science, 29, 438–455.
Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 393–408.
Hauser, J. R., Urban, G. L., Liberali, G., & Braun, M. (2009). Website morphing. Marketing Science, 28, 202–223.
Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31–37.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.
Iyengar, S., Wells, R., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143–150.
Jacoby, J. (1984). Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 432–435.
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 35–53.
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, framing, and privacy: why opting in is not equal to opting out. Marketing Letters, 13, 5–15.
Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2009). Better school meals on a budget: using behavioral economics and food psychology to improve meal selection. Choices, 24, 1–6.
Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2011). The flat-rate pricing paradox: conflicting effects of ‘all-you-can-eat’ buffet pricing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 193–200.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17–31.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312, 1908–1910.
Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 537–549.
Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., Vermeulen, L., & Wrobel, M. V. (2011). Misprediction in choosing Medicare drug plans. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Koehler, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499–519.
Langer, T., & Fox, C. R. (2005). Bias in allocation among risk and uncertainty: partition-dependence, unit dependence, and procedure dependence. University of Muenster. Working paper.
Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2008). The MPG illusion. Science, 320, 1593–1594.
Levav, J., Heitmann, M., Herrmann, A., & Iyengar, S. (2010). Order in product customization decisions: evidence from field experiments. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 274–299.
Loewenstein, G. F., & Elster, J. (1992). Choice over time. New York: Sage.
Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91–108.
Loewenstein, G. F., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Sage.
Lynch, J. G., & Ariely, D. (2000). Wine online: search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Science, 19, 83–103.
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149–1187.
Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When Web pages influence choice: effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 235–245.
Martin, J. M., & Norton, M. I. (2009). Shaping online consumer choice by partitioning the web. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 908–926.
Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In J. Baron & B. A. Mellers (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice. Theory and applications (pp. 11–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Milch, K. F., Appelt, K. C., Weber, E. U., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Krantz, D. H. (2009). From individual preference construction to group decisions: framing effects and group processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 242–255.
Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. Hoboken: Wiley.
Murray, K. B., Liang, J., & Häubl, G. (2010). ACT 2.0: the next generation of assistive consumer technology research. Internet Research, 20, 232–254.
Mytton, O., Gray, A., Rayner, M., & Rutter, H. (2007). Could targeted food taxes improve health? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 689–694.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.
Nickerson, R. S. (2001). The projective way of knowing: a useful heuristic that sometimes misleads. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 168–172.
Nisbett, R. E., & Kanouse, D. E. (1968). Obesity, hunger, and supermarket shopping behavior. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, 3, 683–684.
O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Procrastination in preparing for retirement. In A. Henry (Ed.), Behavioral dimensions of retirement economics (pp. 125–156). Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Payne, J. W. (1975). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Payne, J. W., Sagara, N., Shu, S. B., Appelt, K. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2012). “Life expectation as a constructed belief: evidence of a live-to or die-by framing effect.” Working paper, Columbia University.
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.
Peters, E., Hibbard, J., Slovic, P., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2007). Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk and benefit information. Health Affairs, 26, 741–748.
Peters, E., Dieckmann, N. F., Västfjäll, D., Mertz, C. K., Slovic, P., & Hibbard, J. (2009). Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 15, 213–227.
Price, B., Greiner, R., Häubl, G., & Flatt, A. (2006). Automatic construction of personalized customer interfaces. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI-06).
Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 1, 34–49.
Reed, A., Mikels, J. A., & Simon, K. I. (2008). Older adults prefer less choice than young adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 671–675.
Rosenfield, D. B., Shapiro, R. D., & Butler, D. A. (1983). Optimal strategies for selling an asset. Management Science, 29, 1051–1061.
Sagara, N. (2009). Consumer understanding and use of numeric information in product claims. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon. Retrieved from ProQuest. (Publication No. AAT 3395194)
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 409–425.
Schkade, D., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340–346.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: why more is less. New York: Harper.
Schwartz, N. D. (2010). Bank of America reports $7.3 billion loss, citing charges. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/business/20bank.html.
Shu, S. B. (2008). Future-biased search: the quest for the ideal. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 352–377.
Shu, S. B., & Gneezy, A. (2010). Procrastination of enjoyable experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 933–944.
Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 150–162.
Smith, N. C., Goldstein, D. G, & Johnson, E. J. (2010). Choice without awareness: ethical and policy implications of defaults. Working paper.
Soll, J. B., Keeney, R. L., & Larrick, R. P. (2011). Consumer misunderstanding of credit card use, payments, and debt: causes and solutions. Working paper.
Soman, D., Ainslie, G., Frederick, S., Li, X., Lynch, J., Moreau, P., et al. (2005). The psychology of intertemporal discounting: why are distant events valued differently than proximal ones? Marketing Letters, 16, 347–360.
Streitz, N., Kameas, A., & Mavrommati, I. (2007). The disappearing computer: interaction design, system infrastructures and applications for smart environments. Heidelberg: Springer.
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Wansink, B. (2010). From mindless eating to mindlessly eating better. Physiology and Behavior, 100, 454–463.
Wansink, B. (2012) Package size, portion size, serving size… market size: the unconventional case for half-size servings. Marketing Science, 31, 54–57.
Wansink, B., & Sobal, J. (2007). Mindless eating: the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior, 39, 106–123.
Wansink, B., Just, D. R., & Payne, C. R. (2009). Mindless eating and healthy heuristics for the irrational. American Economic Review, 99, 165–169.
Wansink, B., Soman, D., Herbst, K. C., & Payne, C. R. (2012). Partitioned shopping carts: assortment allocation cues that increase fruit and vegetable purchases. Cornell University. Working paper.
Weber, E. U. (1997). Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: M. Bazerman, D. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, K. Wade-Benzoni (Ed.), Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management (pp. 314–341). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 70, 103–120.
Weber, E. U. (2012). Doing the right thing willingly: behavioral decision theory and environmental policy. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Weber, E. U., & Lindemann, P. G. (2007). From intuition to analysis: making decisions with our head, our heart, or by the book. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 191–208). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Weber, M., Eisenführ, F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1988). The effect of splitting attributes in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science, 34, 431–445.
Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., Milch, K., Chang, H., Brodscholl, J., & Goldstein, D. (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: a query theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516–523.
Weitzman, M. (1979). Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica, 47, 641–654.
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-Commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31, 137–209.
Zauberman, G., & Lynch, J. G. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134, 23–37.
Zwick, R., Rapoport, A., King, A., Lo, C., & Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2003). Consumer search: not enough or too much? Marketing Science, 22, 503–519.
Preparation of this article has been supported by NIA Grant 5R01AG027934 to the first author.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C. et al. Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Mark Lett 23, 487–504 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1
- Choice architecture
- Decision support
- Options and alternatives
- Describing attributes