Abstract
The research examines the two paths of influence of activation technique in advertising, defined as engaging in motor activity required to reveal the advertising message. Under the first path, activation technique enhances the perceived creativity of the advertisement, via its structural and design aspects; whereas under the second path it influences processing fluency via its compatibility with the message. In the latter, activation technique may detract from overall evaluations of the advertisement, especially when the motor activity is incompatible with the message. Two experimental designs demonstrate this dual effect and its underlying mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A pre-test (n = 35) confirmed that the action of turning a page upside-down is more compatible with the “reverse the situation of the needy” (M = 6.00, SD = 0.75) than for the “reverse the boredom of your everyday life” message (M = 3.95, SD = 1.46; t(33) = −4.92, p < 0.05).
References
Ang, H. S., & Low, S. Y. M. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychology and Marketing, 17(10), 835–854.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Blasko, V. J., & Mokwa, M. P. (1986). Creativity in advertising: A Janusian perspective. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 43–50.
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Bernston, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determination of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.
Capelli, S., & Jolibert, A. (2009). Metaphor's validity in marketing research. Psychology and Marketing, 26(12), 1079–1090.
Eisend, M. (2007). Understanding two-sided persuasion: An empirical assessment of theoretical approaches. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 615–640.
Goldenberg, J., Levav, A., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (2009). Cracking the ad code. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D. (2001). Creativity in product innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D. (2008). When deep structures surface: Repetitions that can repeatedly surprise. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 21–34.
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 285(5433), 1495–1496.
Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Yi, T., & Dahl, D. W. (1997). Effects of color as an executional cue in advertising: They're in the shade. Management Science, 43(10), 1387–1400.
Janiszewski, C., & Meyvis, T. (2001). Effects of brand logo complexity, repetition, and spacing on processing fluency and judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 18–32.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–65.
Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 565–586). New York: Guilford.
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211.
Pam, S. E., & Bone, P. F. (1998). Does it matter if it smells? Olfactory stimuli as advertising executional cues. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 29–40.
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133–162). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reber, R., Winkleman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48.
Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–48.
Sengupta, J., & Gorn, G. J. (2002). Absence makes the mind grow sharper: The effect of element omission on subsequent recall. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 186–201.
Shen, H., Jiang, Y., & Adaval, R. (2010). Contrast and assimilation effects of processing fluency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 876–889.
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.
Smith, R. E., MacKenzie, S. B., Yang, X., Buchholz, L. M., & Darley, W. K. (2007). Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising. Marketing Science, 26(6), 819–833.
Smith, R. E., & Young. (2004). Towards a general theory of creativity in advertising: Examining the role of divergence. Marketing Theory, 4(1/2), 29–55.
Steinhart, Y., Yuwei, J. and Wyer. R. J. (2010). Imagery and consumer information processing: The role of visual and verbal processing strategies in comprehension and integration. Proceedings of the Society of Consumer Psychology, 2, 136–137.
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 281–289.
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes In Cognition And Emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinhart, Y. All that glitters is not gold: The dual effect of activation technique in advertising. Mark Lett 23, 195–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-011-9147-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-011-9147-0