Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The persistence of excess brand loyalty over multiple years

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which packaged-goods brands exhibit excess loyalty over a multi-year period. Brand loyalty for 300 brands in 20 UK product categories are compared to theoretically expected loyalty levels calculated using the Dirichlet model. Results show that while many brands show excess loyalty in a particular year (31%), fewer of them (25% and 22%) exhibit excess loyalty over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Almost all the brands that do show persistent excess loyalty are private-label brands or are market-share leaders (either the biggest or the second-biggest brand in the market). Therefore, excess loyalty over multiple years is a rare occurrence for a brand unless it is a market leader or a private-label brand. The study also shows that 38% of all high-share brands have consistent excess loyalty, and 37% of all private-label brands have consistent excess loyalty. These results suggest that existing explanations in the literature as to the sources of excess loyalty need further investigation. The reason is that those explanations relate to distribution effects, which should be similar across such brands. They therefore imply that most high-share and private-label brands should exhibit excess loyalty. The study suggests several avenues for further research to identify the reasons why some high-share or private-label brands show excess loyalty and others do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note these figures relate to bottled beer and ale sold through grocery outlets.

  2. Distribution coverage was measured as the number of retail chains that stock the brand.

  3. Using only the Dirichlet estimates produces an R 2 of 0.84. While the dummy variables add a small increment to the adjusted R 2 of 2%, they are statistically significant at p < 0.001. The regression equation is Loyalty = −0.6 + 1 × Dirichlet estimate + 0.9 × PL + 0.8 × High Share.

References

  • Baldinger, A. L., & Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand loyalty: The link between attitude and behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldinger, A. L., Blair, E., and Echambadi, R. (2002), Why Brands Grow, Journal of Advertising Research (January/February), 7-14.

  • Barwise, T. P. (1986). Repeat-viewing of prime-time TV series. Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, P. T., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1987). The liking and viewing of regular TV series. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, P., & Ehrenberg, A. (1988). Television and its audience. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. (1997). Is your brand’s loyalty too much, too little, or just right? Explaining deviations in loyalty from the Dirichlet norm. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J. (2009). Users guide to DIRICHLET. Marketing Bulletin, 20, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., & Ehrenberg, A. (1997). Private label purchasing. Admap, 32(7), 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, P. J., Wilson, I. W., & Davis, R. A. (2003). A comparison of online and offline consumer brand loyalty. Marketing Science, 22(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, M. G., & Hanssens, D. M. (1995). Empirical generalizations about market evolution and stationarity. Marketing Science, 14(No. 3, Part 2), G109–G121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1991). Politicians’ double jeopardy: A pattern and exceptions. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33(1), 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., Barwise, P., and Barnard, N. R. (1988), The Unit Price of TV Airtime, Admap, October, 22-26.

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., Goodhardt, G., & Barwise, T. P. (1990). Double jeopardy revisited. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., Uncles, M. D., & Goodhardt, G. G. (2004). Understanding brand performance measures: Using Dirichlet benchmarks. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1307–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader, P. S., & Schmittlein, D. C. (1993). Excess behavioral loyalty for high-share brands: Deviations from the Dirichlet model for repeat purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, A., & Hollis, N. (1997). What do you want your brand to be when it grows up: Big and strong? Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C. (1984). The Dirichlet: A comprehensive model of buying behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 147(5), 621–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, S., Gruca, T., & Lopo, R. (2010). Excess loyalty in CPG markets: A comprehensive examination. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 13(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B. E., Kalwani, M. U., & Morrison, D. G. (1988). Niching versus change-of-pace brands: Using purchase frequencies and penetration rates to infer brand positionings. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(November), 384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Z. (2002). Dirichlet.xls. Palmerston North: Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keng, K. A., Uncles, M., Ehrenberg, A., & Barnard, N. (1998). Competitive brand-choice and store-choice among Japanese consumers. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, L., & Raj, S. P. (1991). An empirical analysis of the relationship between brand loyalty and consumer price elasticity. Marketing Science, 10(2), 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, W. S., & Dick, S. J. (2005). Revealing a double jeopardy effect in radio station audience behavior. Journal of Media Economics, 18(4), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, W. N. (1963). Formal theories of mass behaviour. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. H., & Smith, P. M. (1999). The theory of double jeopardy: An example from a forest products industry. Forest Products Journal, 49(3), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, T., & Kumar, S. (2004). Brand metrics: Gauging and linking brands with business performance. Brand Management, 11(5), 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, V. R., Dekimpe, M. G., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Hanssens, D. M. (2001). The category–demand effects of price promotions. Marketing Science, 20(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, S. P. (1985). Striking a balance between brand ‘popularity’ and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 49(Winter), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, J. and Bound, J. (2004), A Discussion of Dirichlet Deviations, in Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Jim Wiley (Ed.) Vol. CD of proceedings. Wellington, New Zealand: School of Marketing and International Business, Victoria University of Wellington.

  • TNS (2008), Superpanel. http://superpanel.tns-global.com/superpanel/

  • Trivedi, K. S. (2002). Probability and statistics with reliability, queuing and computer science applications (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, M. D., & Ellis, K. (1989). The buying of own labels. European Journal of Marketing, 23(3), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, M. D., Hammond, K. A., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Davies, R. E. (1994). A replication study of two brand-loyalty measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(2), 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, M., Ehrenberg, A., & Hammond, K. (1995). Patterns of buyer behavior: Regularities, models, and extensions. Marketing Science, 14(3, Part 2 of 2), G61–G70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vipul Pare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pare, V., Dawes, J. The persistence of excess brand loyalty over multiple years. Mark Lett 23, 163–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-011-9144-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-011-9144-3

Keywords

Navigation