Marketing Letters

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 109–117 | Cite as

Creating brand personality with brand names

Article

Abstract

As the elemental building block of the brand, the brand name represents a potential starting point for creating brand personality. Drawing on theory and research from sound symbolism, this study investigates how brand names can be formed to create brand personality, as defined by Aaker's (1997) Brand Personality Scale. Results indicate that brand names with back vowels better create a Ruggedness personality, while brand names with front vowels better create Sophistication and Sincerity personalities.

Keywords

Brand personality Brand names Sound symbolism 

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaker, J. (1999). The malleable self: the role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batra, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Singh, D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences. In D. A. Aaker & A. L. Biel (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising: advertising's role in building strong brands (pp. 83–96). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R., & Nutall, R. (1959). Method in phonetic symbolism experiments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54(3), 441–445.Google Scholar
  5. Chastaing, M. (1958). Le symbolisme des voyelles: significations des I, I & II. Journal de Psychologie, 55, 403–423. 461–481.Google Scholar
  6. Fónagy, I. (1963). Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. The HagueGoogle Scholar
  7. Freling, T. H., & Forbes, L. P. (2005). An empirical analysis of the brand personality effect. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(7), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamano, Shoko (1986). The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  9. Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., & France, K. R. (1990). Using the phonemes of brand names to symbolize brand attributes. In W. Bearden & A. Parasuraman (Eds.), The AMA Educators' Proceedings: enhancing knowledge development in marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  10. Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (1994). Introduction: sound symbolic processes. In L. Hinton et al. (Eds.), Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: the use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klink, R. R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: a study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 27–34.Google Scholar
  14. Klink, R. R. (2003). Creating meaningful brands: the relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klink, R. R. (2009). Gender differences in new brand response. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 406–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKay, I. R. A. (1978). Introducing practical phonetics. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. The American Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peterfalvi, J. M. (1970). Recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique. The American Journal of Psychology, 65, 439–473.Google Scholar
  22. Plato (1985). The collected dialogues of Plato including the letters, Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, eds. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Plummer, J. T. (1985). How personality makes a difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 27–31.Google Scholar
  24. Samarin, W. J. (1967). Determining the meanings of ideophones. Journal of West African Languages, 4(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  25. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sirgy, J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yorkston, E., & Menon, G. (2004). A sound idea: phonetic effect of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yorkston, E. A., Nunes, J. C., & Matta, S. (2010). The malleable brand: the role of implicit theories in evaluating brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 74, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Sellinger School of Business and ManagementLoyola University MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations