Skip to main content
Log in

The Breadth-Based Adjective Rating Task (BART) in consumer behavior

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer researchers have suggested that nonconscious processes may operate on consumer behavior. The goal of this research was to evaluate the Breadth-Based Adjective Rating Task (BART), an indirect measure of attitudes, in the consumer domain. In study 1, the BART was related to past Philadelphia Inquirer usage and was a significant predictor of prospective choice. In study 2, the BART was related to past Ben & Jerry’s purchase and was a marginal predictor of prospective choice. Overall, the BART added to the specificity of prediction of consumer behavior. The potentiality of the BART in consumer research is discussed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, J., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know. The Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 123–156. doi:10.1086/314317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (2002). Losing consciousness: automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 280–285. doi:10.1086/341577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunel, F. F., Tietje, B. C., Collins, C. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 385–404. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 28, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability and the validity of indirect questioning. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315. doi:10.1086/209351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M. R., & Perkins, A. (2005). Implicit assimilation and explicit contrast: A set/reset model of response to celebrity voice-overs. The Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 435–441. doi:10.1086/497555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the implicit association test. The Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178–188. doi:10.1086/527341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire, M. (1950). Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 14, 649–656. doi:10.2307/1246942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpinski, A., & von Hippel, W. (1996). The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectancy maintenance. Social Cognition, 14, 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpinski, A., Steinberg, J. L., Versek, B., & Alloy, L. B. (2007). The Breadth-Based Adjective Rating Task (BART) as an indirect measure of self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25, 778–818. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1983). Personality: Measurement and theory. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klofper, W. G., & Taulbee, E. S. (1976). Projective tests. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 543–568. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.002551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies of in-group protection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. (2001). The implicit association test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435–442. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seechrest, L., Stickle, T. R., & Stewart, M. (1998). The role of assessment in clinical psychology (Vol. 4: Assessment). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, V., Eadie, D., & MacAskill, S. (1996). Projective and enabling techniques explored. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14, 38–43. doi:10.1108/02634509610131144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross B. Steinman.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1

Table 1 Trait adjectives used in the BART

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinman, R.B., Karpinski, A. The Breadth-Based Adjective Rating Task (BART) in consumer behavior. Mark Lett 20, 327–335 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9076-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9076-3

Keywords

Navigation