Skip to main content
Log in

Discrete choice models of firms’ strategic decisions

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines the methods and applications related to the nascent area of empirical discrete games in marketing. Many key strategic decisions firms make involve discrete choices such as deciding the location of a new store, determining where in product space to position a product, or what options to offer in a service contract. These decisions are fairly complex and typically involve the consideration of a number of demand, cost, and competitive factors. What makes these discrete choices particularly interesting (and challenging to analyze) is that they are interrelated with the choices of other firms because firms take into account the actions of their competitors when making their own decisions. We describe the basic problem of dealing with interrelated discrete choices in a game-theoretic framework and present the various estimation methods available. A discussion of the existing applications and future research opportunities concludes the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For an excellent survey of the growing literature in social interactions in a consumer context, see Hartmann et al., “Interdependent Choices and Social Multipliers: Identification, Methods and Policy Implications” in this issue.

  2. Also known as the social surplus function.

References

  • Aguirregabiria, V., & Ho, C.-Y. (2006). A dynamic oligopoly game of the U.S. airline industry: Estimation and policy experiments. Working paper, Boston University.

  • Aguirregabiria, V., & Mira, P. (2007). Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica, 75(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajari, P., Benkard, L., & Levin, J. (2007). Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica, 75(5), 1331–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajari, P., Hong, H., Krainer, J., & Nekipelov, D. (2006). Estimating static models of strategic interaction. NBER working paper no. W12013.

  • Bajari, P., Hong, H., & Ryan, S. (2007). Identification and estimation of a discrete game of complete information. Technical report, University of Minnesota.

  • Berry, S. (1992). Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica, 60(4), 889–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., & Reiss, P. (2007). Empirical models of entry and market structure. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp. 1845–1886). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., Ostrovsky, M., & Pakes, A. (2007). Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND Journal of Economics, 38, 373–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1987). Do entry conditions vary across markets? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 833–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1991a). Empirical models of discrete games. Journal of Econometrics, 48(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1991b). Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy, 99(51), 977–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberto, F., & Tamer, E. (2006). Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard-Wexler, A. (2005). Plant turnover and demand fluctuations in the ready-mix concrete industry. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business.

  • Doraszelski, U., & Pakes, A. (2007). A framework for applied dynamic analysis in IO. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp. 1887–1966). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draganska, M., Mazzeo, M., & Seim, K. (2007). Beyond plain vanilla: Modeling product assortment choices in the ice cream market. Working paper, Stanford University.

  • Dunne, T., Klimek, S., Roberts, M., & Xu, Y. (2006). Entry and exit in geographic markets. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.

  • Economides, N., Seim, K., & Viard, B. (2004). Quantifying the benefits of entry into local phone service. NET institute working paper 05-08.

  • Einav, L. (2003). Not all rivals look alike: Estimating an equilibrium model of the release date timing game. Working paper, Stanford University.

  • Ellickson, P., & Misra, S. (2007a). Enriching interactions: Incorporating revenue and cost data into static discrete games. Working paper, Duke University.

  • Ellickson, P., & Misra, S. (2007b). Supermarket pricing strategies. Working paper, Duke University.

  • Grubb, M. (2007). Selling to overconfident consumers. Technical report, MIT Sloan School of Management.

  • Horsky, D., Misra, S., & Nelson, P. (2007). Competitive positioning and pricing of brand lines. Working paper, University of Rochester.

  • Horsky, D., & Nelson, P. (1992). New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Science, 11(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, P. (2006). What happens when Walmart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry. Technical report, MIT.

  • Judd, K., & Su, C.-L. (2007). Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. Working paper, Hoover Institution.

  • Lambrecht, A., Seim, K., & Skiera, B. (2007). Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Science, 26, 698–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzeo, M. (2002a). Competitive outcomes in product-differentiated oligopoly. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 716–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzeo, M. (2002b). Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miravete, E. (2002). Estimation demand for local telephone service with asymmetric information and optional calling plans. Review of Economic Studies, 69, 943–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miravete, E., & Roller, L.-H. (2004). Competitive nonlinear pricing in duopoly equilibrium: The early US cellular telephone industry. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Narayanan, S., Chintagunta, P., & Miravete, E. (2007). The role of self selection, usage uncertainty and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orazem, P., & Xiao, M. (2006). Do entry conditions vary over time? Entry and competition in the broadband market: 1999-2003. Working paper, University of Arizona.

  • Orhun, Y. (2006). Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry. Working paper, GSB Chicago.

  • Pesendorfer, M., & Schmidt-Dengler, P. (2003). Identification and estimation of dynamic games. Working paper no. 9726, NBER, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, P. C., & Spiller, P. T. (1989). Competition and entry in small airline markets. Journal of Law & Economics, 32(2), S179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T. (2007). A nested logit model of strategic promotion. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(1), 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, J. (1994). Estimation of dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: Discrete decision processes. In C. Sims (Ed.), Advances in econometrics: Sixth World Congress (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S., & Tucker, C. (2007). Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Working paper, MIT.

  • Seim, K. (2006). An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 619–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., & Zhu, T. (2007). Pricing and market concentration in oligopoly markets. Working Paper.

  • Sudhir, K., Datta, S., & Talukdar, D. (2007). A structural model of entry and location choice: The differentiation-agglomeration tradeoff. Working paper, Yale University.

  • Sweeting, A. (2005). Coordination games, multiple equilibria and the timing of radio commercials. Working paper No. 68, CSIO, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomadsen, R. (2005). The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 908–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomadsen, R. (2007). Product positioning and competition: The role of location in the fast food industry. Marketing Science, 26, 792–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitorino, M. A. (2007). Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry. Working paper, Chicago GSB.

  • Zhu, T., & Singh, V. (2006). Spatial competition and endogenous location choices: An application to discount retailing. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Draganska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Draganska, M., Misra, S., Aguirregabiria, V. et al. Discrete choice models of firms’ strategic decisions. Mark Lett 19, 399–416 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9060-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9060-3

Keywords

Navigation