Interaction between two types of information on reactions to delays

Abstract

This study examines the effects of the interaction of two types of information about delays—information about the duration of a delay (delay duration information) and information about the reason for a delay (delay reason information)—on people’s reactions to delays. In this paper, we argue and demonstrate that the two types of delay information interact to affect attribution for the delay and perceived delay duration. The results obtained from an experimental study indicated that there was a stronger effect of delay reason information on attribution for the delay when delay duration information was absent than when the information was present. When no reason was given for the delay, the subjects attributed greater control to the service provider and perceived the delay to be longer when delay duration information was absent than when the information was present.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Antonides, G., Verhoef, P.C., & Van Aalst, M. (2002). Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: a field experiment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Averill, J.R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286–303.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, J., & Cameron, M. (1996). The effects of the service environment on affect and consumer perception of waiting time: An integrative review and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bitner, M.J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton, R.N., & Drew, J.H. (1994). Linking customer satisfaction to service operations and outcomes. In Rust, R.T. & Oliver, R.L. (eds.), Service quality: New directions in theory and practice, London: Sage, pp. 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burger, J.M., & Hemans, L.T. (1988). Desire for control and the use of attribution processes. Journal of Personality, 56(3), 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chebat, J.-C., Filiatrault, P., Gelinas-Chebat, C., & Vaninsky, A. (1995). Impact of waiting attribution & consumer’s mood on perceived quality. Journal of Business Research, 34(3), 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durrande-Moreau, A. (1999). Waiting for service: ten years of empirical research. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(2), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flaherty, M.G. (1999). A watched pot: how we experienced time. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forsyth, D.R. (1980). The functions of attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey, J.H., & Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 427–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hornik, J. (1984). Subjective vs. objective time measures: a note on the perception of time in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 615–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui, M.K., Thakor, M.V., & R. Gill (1998). The effect of delay type and service stage on consumers’ reactions to waiting. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hui, M.K., & Tse, D.K. (1996). What to tell consumers in waits of different lengths: an integrative model of service evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 60, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G.J. & Berning, C.K. (1976). Time and consumer behavior: an interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 320–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston, R. (1994). Exploring the relationship between service transactions and satisfaction with overall service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(2), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katz, K.L., Larson, B.M., & Larson, R.C. (1987). Prescription for the waiting-in-line blues: entertain, enlighten, & engage. Sloan Management Review, 32, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelley, H.H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown. NJ: General, Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnamurthy, P., & Kumar, P. (2002). Self-other discrepancies in waiting time decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lerner, M.J., & Miller, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maister, D.H. (1985). The psychology of waiting in lines. In Czepiel, J.A. Solomon, M.R., & Surprenant, C.F. (eds.), The service encounter, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, D.T., & Porter, C.A. (1988). Errors and biases in the attribution process. In Abramson, L.Y. (ed.), Social cognition and clinical psychology: A synthesis. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mowen, J.C., & Mowen, M.M. (1991). Time and outcome valuation: Implications for marketing decision making. Journal of Marketing, 55, 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Osuna, E.E. (1985). The psychological cost of waiting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(1), 82–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pittman, T.S., Stephenson, B., & Swann, W.B. (1981). Curiosity and control: on the determinants of the search for social knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 635–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pruyn, A., & Smidts, A. (1998). Effects of waiting on the satisfaction with the service: beyond objective time measures. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15(4), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic, (11).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Russell, D. (1982). The causal dimension scale: a measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, S., & Claxton, J. (1994). Delays and the dynamics of service evaluations. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22(3), 254–264.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tse, D.K., & Wilton, P.T. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: an extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: an integrated model of time estimation. In Levin, I. & Zakay, D. (eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, pp. 365–397.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan C. Tse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hui, M.K., Tse, A.C. & Zhou, L. Interaction between two types of information on reactions to delays. Market Lett 17, 151–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-5927-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delay
  • Information
  • Attribution
  • Control deprivation