Skip to main content
Log in

An exploratory analysis of the determinants of cooperative advertising participation rates

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper offers an exploratory empirical investigation of the determinants of cooperative advertising participation rates. Using data for 2,286 brands, we examine the relationship of participation rates to national advertising expenditures by brand. We also consider how participation rates vary with average manufacturers’ margins by industry, average retail margins by category, and additional category-level variables. Reflecting the discrete nature of the dependent variable, the analysis employs discrete choice estimation techniques instead of OLS regression. The results reveal a significant quadratic relationship between advertising and participation rates. We interpret this and other significant findings in the context of existing work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ad Summary. January–December (1990). New York: Leading National Advertisers, Inc.

  • Advertising Trends Report. Spring. (1985). Peoria, IL: MultiAd, Inc.

  • Bergen, M., & John, G. (1997). Understanding Cooperative Advertising Participation Rates in Conventional Channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.D. (1972). Vertical Cooperative Advertising Ventures. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 309–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M. (2003). Brand Killers. Fortune, 148(11 August), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. (2000). Dual destiny. Adweek, 41, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N.R., & Preston, L.E. (1969). Price-cost Margins and Industry Structure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W.S., & Wilson, T.A. (1967). Advertising, Market Structure, and Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, E. (1985). Who Should Control Co-op? Sales & Marketing Management, 134, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discount Store News. (1986). Co-op Reigns Where Brands Are King, 25 (3 February), 27 et seq.

  • Doraiswamy, K., McGuire, T.W., & Staelin, R. (1979). An Analysis of Alternative Advertising Strategies in a Competitive Franchise Framework. In N. Beckwith et al. (Eds.), Educator’s conference proceedings, American Marketing Association.

  • Dutta, S., Bergen, M., John, G., & Rao, A. (1995). Variations in the Contractual Terms of Cooperative Advertising Contracts: An empirical investigation. Marketing Letters, 6, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, M. (1986). Sales Tool for Synergists. Sales & Marketing Management, 136, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P.A. (1982). Simultaneous Equations Models of the Structure-Performance Paradigm. European Economic Review, 19, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D.I., Best, R.J., & Coney, K.A. (2004). Consumer behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, L., & Raj, S.P. (1988). A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities. Marketing Science, 7, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1965). Exploit the Product Life Cycle. Harvard Business Review, 43(Nov/Dec), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, B.R. (1990). An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, M.-S., Choi, J.W., & Kim, D.-G. (2003). Bayesian inference and model selection in latent class logit models with parameter constraints: an application to market segmentation. Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1974). Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power and Market Performance in Consumer Goods Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. (1993). Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, D.K. (1983). Intertemporal Profit Margin Variability and Market Structure in Australian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, T.M., Gupta, Y.P., & Herriott, S.R. (1990). Analysis of Cooperative Advertising Expenditures: A transfer function approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenburgh, T.J., Ainslie, A., & Engebretson, P.H. (2003). Massively Categorical Variables: Revealing the information in zip codes. Marketing Science, 22, 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R.L. (1973). Does Advertising Lower Consumer Prices? Journal of Marketing, 37, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R.L. (1991). Manufacturers’ Promotional Allowances, Free Riders and Vertical Restraints. The Antitrust Bulletin, 36, 383–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R.L. (1993). The Inverse Association Between the Margins of Manufacturers and Retailers. Review of Industrial Organization, 8, 717–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K.E., & Toyama, N. (1989). Pareto Dominance through Self-Selecting Tariffs: The case of TOU Electricity Rates for Agricultural Customers. The Energy Journal, 10, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew G. Nagler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagler, M.G. An exploratory analysis of the determinants of cooperative advertising participation rates. Market Lett 17, 91–102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-4387-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-4387-0

Keywords

Navigation